World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 54 4518 4181 2510 2271 95 15742

John Baer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John Baer between 1984 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John Baer published across 39 years, from 1984 to 2022, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 1998. 4 of the 125 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 1998. 1984: 2 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 8 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 4 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 4 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 2 publications
1984 2022

125 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John Baer: publications per year, 1984 to 2022
Year Publications
1984 2
1985 0
1986 3
1987 0
1988 7
1989 2
1990 0
1991 4
1992 3
1993 4
1994 3
1995 5
1996 1
1997 1
1998 8
1999 4
2000 5
2001 5
2002 3
2003 7
2004 3
2005 4
2006 2
2007 6
2008 6
2009 2
2010 3
2011 1
2012 4
2013 1
2014 4
2015 5
2016 2
2017 3
2018 4
2019 2
2020 2
2021 2
2022 2
Total 125
Download as CSV

John Baer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Baer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 95 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 95
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

John Baer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Baer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 54
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

John Baer is affiliated with Rider University in the United States and focuses primarily on the fields of psychology and medicine. Their research work spans several subfields, including applied psychology, epidemiology, general health professions, public health, environmental and occupational health, and endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism.

Their main topics of study involve digital mental health interventions, substance abuse treatment and outcomes, telemedicine and telehealth implementation, mental health and patient involvement, diabetes management and education, sleep and related disorders, and adolescent sexual and reproductive health.

Baer has contributed to several recent papers published in respected journals. These publications include:

  • Virtual Standardized Patients vs Academic Training for Learning Motivational Interviewing Skills in the US Department of Veterans Affairs and the US Military, 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • Usability and Acceptability of a Mobile App for the Self-Management of Alcohol Misuse Among Veterans (Step Away): Pilot Cohort Study, 2021, JMIR mhealth and uhealth
  • U.S. veterans' experiences and factors associated with use of a smartphone application to self-manage unhealthy alcohol use, 2022, Psychological Services
  • A randomized clinical trial evaluating the impact of counselor training and patient feedback on substance use disorder patients' sexual risk behavior, 2022, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Frequent coauthors in Baer's research include Carol A. Malte, Patrick Dulin, John C. Fortney, Anissa N. Danner, and Aline Lott. Their publications appear in venues such as:

  • JAMA Network Open
  • JMIR mhealth and uhealth
  • Psychological Services
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Best Publications

  • Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers: results from a 2-year follow-up assessment.

    G. Alan Marlatt;John S. Baer;Daniel R. Kivlahan;Linda A. Dimeff

  • Biases in the perception of drinking norms among college students.

    John S. Baer;Alan Stacy;Mary Larimer

  • Gender Differences in Creativity

    John Baer;James C. Kaufman

  • Addictive Behaviors: Etiology and Treatment

    G A Marlatt;J S Baer;D M Donovan;D R Kivlahan

  • Essentials of Creativity Assessment

    James C. Kaufman;Jonathan A. Plucker;John Baer

  • Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students (Basics): A Harm Reduction Approach

    Daniel R. Kivlahan;Linda A. Dimeff;John S. Baer;G. Alan Marlatt

  • Creativity and Divergent Thinking: A Task-Specific Approach

    John Baer

  • The case for domain specificity of creativity.

    John Baer

  • Student factors: understanding individual variation in college drinking.

    John S Baer

  • Brief intervention for heavy-drinking college students: 4-year follow-up and natural history.

    John S. Baer;Daniel R. Kivlahan;Arthur W. Blume;Patrick McKnight

  • Social support and smoking cessation and maintenance.

    Robin J. Mermelstein;Sheldon Cohen;Edward Lichtenstein;John S. Baer

  • Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers: Results from a 2-year follow-up assessment.

    Unknown

  • Bridging Generality and Specificity: The Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) Model of Creativity

    John Baer;James C. Kaufman

  • Test-retest reliability of alcohol measures: is there a difference between internet-based assessment and traditional methods?

    Elizabeth T. Miller;Derrick J. Neal;Lisa J. Roberts;John S. Baer

  • A Comparison of Expert and Nonexpert Raters Using the Consensual Assessment Technique

    James C. Kaufman;John Baer;Jason C. Cole;Janel D. Sexton

  • An experimental test of three methods of alcohol risk reduction with young adults.

    J. S. Baer;G. A. Marlatt;Daniel R. Kivlahan;Kim Fromme

  • Beyond New and Appropriate: Who Decides What Is Creative?

    James C. Kaufman;John Baer

  • Extension of the Consensual Assessment Technique to Nonparallel Creative Products

    John Baer;James C. Kaufman;Claudia A. Gentile

  • Self-efficacy and smoking reexamined: construct validity and clinical utility.

    John S. Baer;Craig S. Holt;Edward Lichtenstein

  • High‐Risk Drinking across the Transition from High School to College

    J. S. Baer;Daniel R. Kivlahan;G. A. Marlatt

  • Advancing Creativity Theory and Research: A Socio‐cultural Manifesto

    Vlad Petre Glaveanu;Michael Hanchett Hanson;John Baer;Baptiste Barbot

  • Sure, I'm Creative—But Not in Mathematics!: Self-Reported Creativity in Diverse Domains

    James C. Kaufman;John Baer

  • Creativity Across Domains : Faces of the Muse

    James C. Kaufman;John Baer

  • Effects of college residence on perceived norms for alcohol consumption: An examination of the first year in college.

    John S. Baer

  • Assessing Creativity Using the Consensual Assessment Technique

    John Baer;James C. Kaufman

  • An evaluation of workshop training in motivational interviewing for addiction and mental health clinicians.

    John S Baer;David B Rosengren;Christopher W Dunn;Elizabeth A Wells

  • Domain Specificity and the Limits of Creativity Theory

    John Baer

  • Divergent thinking is not a general trait: A multidomain training experiment

    John Baer

  • The Effects of Task-Specific Divergent-Thinking Training

    John Baer

  • Classification and prediction of smoking relapse episodes: an exploration of individual differences.

    John S. Baer;Edward Lichtenstein

  • The Construct of Creativity: Structural Model for Self‐Reported Creativity Ratings

    James C. Kaufman;Jason C. Cole;John Baer

  • Captions, consistency, creativity, and the consensual assessment technique: New evidence of reliability.

    James C. Kaufman;Joohyun Lee;John Baer;Soonmook Lee

  • Expertise, Domains, and the Consensual Assessment Technique.

    James C. Kaufman;John Baer;Jason C. Cole

  • Self-efficacy and addictive behavior

    G. Alan Marlatt;John S. Baer;Lori A. Quigley

  • Furious activity vs. understanding: How much expertise is needed to evaluate creative work?

    James C. Kaufman;John Baer;David H. Cropley;Roni Reiter-Palmon

  • Generality of creativity across performance domains

    John Baer

  • Effectiveness of workshop training for psychosocial addiction treatments: a systematic review.

    Scott T. Walters;Sarah A. Matson;John S. Baer;John S. Baer;Douglas M. Ziedonis

  • Harm reduction for alcohol problems: Moving beyond the controlled drinking controversy *

    G. Alan Marlatt;Mary E. Larimer;John S. Baer;Lori A. Quigley

  • The problem of college drinking: insights from a developmental perspective.

    John Schulenberg;Jennifer L. Maggs;Stephen W. Long;Kenneth J. Sher

  • Short-term effects of a brief motivational intervention to reduce alcohol and drug risk among homeless adolescents.

    Peggy L. Peterson;John S. Baer;Elizabeth A. Wells;Joshua A. Ginzler

Frequent Co-Authors

James C. Kaufman
James C. Kaufman University of Connecticut
Vlad Petre Glaveanu
Vlad Petre Glaveanu University of Bergen
Jonathan A. Plucker
Jonathan A. Plucker Johns Hopkins University
Roy F. Baumeister
Roy F. Baumeister University of Queensland
Dean Keith Simonton
Dean Keith Simonton University of California, Davis
Roni Reiter-Palmon
Roni Reiter-Palmon University of Nebraska at Omaha
Baptiste Barbot
Baptiste Barbot Université Catholique de Louvain
Todd Lubart
Todd Lubart Université Paris Cité
Robert J. Sternberg
Robert J. Sternberg Cornell University
Giovanni Emanuele Corazza
Giovanni Emanuele Corazza University of Bologna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens the door to a variety of rewarding career pathways, many of which can be accessed through online degrees. Social work is one of the most sought-after fields for psychology graduates, offering roles in diverse environments such as schools, hospitals, and community organizations. Each state has unique licensing requirements and career expectations that are important to understand before pursuing this path.

For instance, the process for becoming a social worker in Alaska emphasizes specific education and supervised practice. Meanwhile, the requirements to be a social worker in Arizona or the requirements to be a social worker in Arkansas vary by degree level and specialization. If you’re considering work on the West Coast, exploring the steps for becoming a social worker in California is essential, as the state has some of the most comprehensive regulations.

When researching online degrees and career pathways, it’s crucial to check state-specific information to ensure your education and credentials will be recognized where you want to practice. This can help streamline your journey from student to licensed professional in the dynamic field of social services.

Best Scientists Citing John Baer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles