World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Philip C. Abrami

Philip C. Abrami

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
65
Citations
27533
World Ranking
1009
National Ranking
57

Philip C. Abrami publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip C. Abrami sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 203 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Philip C. Abrami D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip C. Abrami sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip C. Abrami is affiliated with Concordia University in Canada. Their research primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences, Psychology, and Computer Science, with a strong focus on Education and its intersection with technology.

The scientist has contributed extensively to subfields such as Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Information Systems, Computer Science Applications, and Library and Information Sciences.

The main topics of their work include:

  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Education and Technology Integration
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Educational Games and Gamification
  • ICT in Developing Communities
  • Online Learning and Analytics
  • Online and Blended Learning

Among recent papers authored by Philip C. Abrami is "The effects of ABRACADABRA on reading outcomes: An updated meta-analysis and landscape review of applied field research" published in 2020 in the Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. Other notable recent publications that reflect closely related research interests include works published in the Journal of Information Literacy, International Journal of Instruction, and International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, dated 2020 and 2022.

Frequent coauthors in their work include:

  • Larysa Lysenko
  • Anne Wade
  • Rose Iminza
  • Enos Kiforo
  • Alan Cheung

Philip C. Abrami's research is disseminated across several venues, notable for their relevant scope in educational technology and pedagogy. These frequent publication venues are:

  • Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
  • Journal of Information Literacy
  • International Journal of Instruction
  • International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education
  • Educational Technology Research and Development

Best Publications

  • How Does Distance Education Compare With Classroom Instruction? A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature

    Robert M. Bernard;Philip C. Abrami;Yiping Lou;Evgueni Borokhovski

  • Students' evaluations of University teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research

    Herbert W. Marsh

  • A Meta-Analysis of Three Types of Interaction Treatments in Distance Education

    Robert M. Bernard;Philip C. Abrami;Eugene Borokhovski;C. Anne Wade

  • What Forty Years of Research Says About the Impact of Technology on Learning: A Second-Order Meta-Analysis and Validation Study

    Rana M. Tamim;Robert M. Bernard;Eugene Borokhovski;Philip C. Abrami

  • Instructional Interventions Affecting Critical Thinking Skills and Dispositions: A Stage 1 Meta-Analysis

    Philip C. Abrami;Robert M. Bernard;Evgueni Borokhovski;Anne Wade

  • Within-Class Grouping: A Meta-Analysis

    Yiping Lou;Philip C. Abrami;John C. Spence;Catherine Poulsen

  • Small Group and Individual Learning with Technology: A Meta-Analysis:

    Yiping Lou;Philip C. Abrami;Sylvia d’Apollonia

  • Strategies for Teaching Students to Think Critically A Meta-Analysis

    Philip C. Abrami;Robert M. Bernard;Eugene Borokhovski;David I. Waddington

  • A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: from the general to the applied

    Robert M. Bernard;Eugene Borokhovski;Richard F. Schmid;Rana M. Tamim

  • Implementing Computer Technologies: Teachers' Perceptions and Practices

    Lori Wozney;Vivek Venkatesh;Philip C. Abrami

  • Navigating student ratings of instruction.

    Sylvia d'Apollonia;Philip C. Abrami

  • Directions for Research and Development on Electronic Portfolios

    Philip C. Abrami;Helen Barrett

  • Validity of student ratings of instruction : what we know and what we do not

    Philip C. Abrami;Sylvia d'Apollonia;Peter A. Cohen

  • Interaction in Distance Education and Online Learning: Using Evidence and Theory to Improve Practice

    Philip C. Abrami;Robert M. Bernard;Eva Mary Bures;Eugene Borokhovski

  • Teacher motivation to implement an educational innovation: factors differentiating users and non-users of cooperative learning

    Philip C. Abrami;Catherine Poulsen;Bette Chambers

  • The effects of technology use in postsecondary education: A meta-analysis of classroom applications

    Richard F. Schmid;Robert M. Bernard;Eugene Borokhovski;Rana M. Tamim

  • The Dimensionality of Student Ratings of Instruction: What We Know and What We Do Not*

    Philip C. Abrami;Sylvia d’Apollonia;Steven Rosenfield

  • The development of a questionnaire for predicting online learning achievement

    Robert M. Bernard;Aaron Brauer;Philip C. Abrami;Mike Surkes

  • Media and Pedagogy in Undergraduate Distance Education: A Theory-Based Meta-Analysis of Empirical Literature

    Yiping Lou;Robert M. Bernard;Philip C. Abrami

  • Student Goal Orientation and Interest: Effects on Students' Use of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies.

    Katherine McWhaw;Philip C. Abrami

  • Improving literacy and metacognition with electronic portfolios: Teaching and learning with ePEARL

    Elizabeth Meyer;Philip C. Abrami;C. Anne Wade;Ofra Aslan

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Savage
Robert Savage York University
Raymond P. Perry
Raymond P. Perry University of Manitoba
John C. Spence
John C. Spence University of Alberta
Nancy A. Madden
Nancy A. Madden Johns Hopkins University
Robert E. Slavin
Robert E. Slavin Johns Hopkins University
Larry V. Hedges
Larry V. Hedges Northwestern University
Thomas D. Cook
Thomas D. Cook University of Wisconsin–Madison
Harris Cooper
Harris Cooper Duke University
Andrew Feenberg
Andrew Feenberg Simon Fraser University
Eileen Wood
Eileen Wood Wilfrid Laurier University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens diverse options for online study and career advancement. Many students seek flexible, cost-effective programs tailored to their personal and professional goals. If affordability is important, consider an affordable online psychology masters program, which balances quality education with lower tuition costs.

For those eager to fast-track their education, several schools offer accelerated edd options. These programs allow you to earn a doctoral degree in a shorter time frame and prepare you for leadership roles in education. Similarly, working professionals wanting a quick credential boost can look into 1 year master's programs online, which help students earn a graduate degree rapidly and reenter the workforce or pursue further study.

Undergraduate learners aiming to finish sooner can benefit from accelerated programs, completing a bachelor's degree in less time. All these online pathways offer the flexibility to balance studies with life and work, making them ideal for adult learners and career changers alike.

Best Scientists Citing Philip C. Abrami

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles