World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Philip C. Abrami

Philip C. Abrami

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 65 1009 874 57 50 203 27533

Philip C. Abrami publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Philip C. Abrami between 1975 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Philip C. Abrami published across 51 years, from 1975 to 2025, averaging 4.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2011. 2 of the 207 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2011. 1975: 2 publications 1976: 4 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 3 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 4 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 4 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 4 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 2 publications
1975 2025

207 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Philip C. Abrami: publications per year, 1975 to 2025
Year Publications
1975 2
1976 4
1977 2
1978 2
1979 2
1980 2
1981 1
1982 3
1983 2
1984 0
1985 2
1986 0
1987 1
1988 1
1989 4
1990 2
1991 2
1992 2
1993 2
1994 1
1995 1
1996 4
1997 3
1998 2
1999 2
2000 5
2001 9
2002 2
2003 2
2004 6
2005 7
2006 11
2007 4
2008 10
2009 9
2010 13
2011 14
2012 7
2013 9
2014 8
2015 7
2016 10
2017 7
2018 1
2019 4
2020 3
2021 3
2022 3
2023 2
2024 0
2025 2
Total 207
Download as CSV

Philip C. Abrami publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip C. Abrami sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 194–203 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 203 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304 203
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Philip C. Abrami D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip C. Abrami sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59 65
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Philip C. Abrami is affiliated with Concordia University in Canada. Their research primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences, Psychology, and Computer Science, with a strong focus on Education and its intersection with technology.

The scientist has contributed extensively to subfields such as Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Information Systems, Computer Science Applications, and Library and Information Sciences.

The main topics of their work include:

  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Education and Technology Integration
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Educational Games and Gamification
  • ICT in Developing Communities
  • Online Learning and Analytics
  • Online and Blended Learning

Among recent papers authored by Philip C. Abrami is "The effects of ABRACADABRA on reading outcomes: An updated meta-analysis and landscape review of applied field research" published in 2020 in the Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. Other notable recent publications that reflect closely related research interests include works published in the Journal of Information Literacy, International Journal of Instruction, and International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, dated 2020 and 2022.

Frequent coauthors in their work include:

  • Larysa Lysenko
  • Anne Wade
  • Rose Iminza
  • Enos Kiforo
  • Alan Cheung

Philip C. Abrami's research is disseminated across several venues, notable for their relevant scope in educational technology and pedagogy. These frequent publication venues are:

  • Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
  • Journal of Information Literacy
  • International Journal of Instruction
  • International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education
  • Educational Technology Research and Development

Best Publications

  • How Does Distance Education Compare With Classroom Instruction? A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature

    Robert M. Bernard;Philip C. Abrami;Yiping Lou;Evgueni Borokhovski

  • Students' evaluations of University teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research

    Herbert W. Marsh

  • A Meta-Analysis of Three Types of Interaction Treatments in Distance Education

    Robert M. Bernard;Philip C. Abrami;Eugene Borokhovski;C. Anne Wade

  • What Forty Years of Research Says About the Impact of Technology on Learning: A Second-Order Meta-Analysis and Validation Study

    Rana M. Tamim;Robert M. Bernard;Eugene Borokhovski;Philip C. Abrami

  • Instructional Interventions Affecting Critical Thinking Skills and Dispositions: A Stage 1 Meta-Analysis

    Philip C. Abrami;Robert M. Bernard;Evgueni Borokhovski;Anne Wade

  • Within-Class Grouping: A Meta-Analysis

    Yiping Lou;Philip C. Abrami;John C. Spence;Catherine Poulsen

  • Small Group and Individual Learning with Technology: A Meta-Analysis:

    Yiping Lou;Philip C. Abrami;Sylvia d’Apollonia

  • Strategies for Teaching Students to Think Critically A Meta-Analysis

    Philip C. Abrami;Robert M. Bernard;Eugene Borokhovski;David I. Waddington

  • A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: from the general to the applied

    Robert M. Bernard;Eugene Borokhovski;Richard F. Schmid;Rana M. Tamim

  • Implementing Computer Technologies: Teachers' Perceptions and Practices

    Lori Wozney;Vivek Venkatesh;Philip C. Abrami

  • Navigating student ratings of instruction.

    Sylvia d'Apollonia;Philip C. Abrami

  • Directions for Research and Development on Electronic Portfolios

    Philip C. Abrami;Helen Barrett

  • Validity of student ratings of instruction : what we know and what we do not

    Philip C. Abrami;Sylvia d'Apollonia;Peter A. Cohen

  • Interaction in Distance Education and Online Learning: Using Evidence and Theory to Improve Practice

    Philip C. Abrami;Robert M. Bernard;Eva Mary Bures;Eugene Borokhovski

  • Teacher motivation to implement an educational innovation: factors differentiating users and non-users of cooperative learning

    Philip C. Abrami;Catherine Poulsen;Bette Chambers

  • The effects of technology use in postsecondary education: A meta-analysis of classroom applications

    Richard F. Schmid;Robert M. Bernard;Eugene Borokhovski;Rana M. Tamim

  • The Dimensionality of Student Ratings of Instruction: What We Know and What We Do Not*

    Philip C. Abrami;Sylvia d’Apollonia;Steven Rosenfield

  • The development of a questionnaire for predicting online learning achievement

    Robert M. Bernard;Aaron Brauer;Philip C. Abrami;Mike Surkes

  • Media and Pedagogy in Undergraduate Distance Education: A Theory-Based Meta-Analysis of Empirical Literature

    Yiping Lou;Robert M. Bernard;Philip C. Abrami

  • Student Goal Orientation and Interest: Effects on Students' Use of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies.

    Katherine McWhaw;Philip C. Abrami

  • Improving literacy and metacognition with electronic portfolios: Teaching and learning with ePEARL

    Elizabeth Meyer;Philip C. Abrami;C. Anne Wade;Ofra Aslan

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Savage
Robert Savage York University
Raymond P. Perry
Raymond P. Perry University of Manitoba
John C. Spence
John C. Spence University of Alberta
Nancy A. Madden
Nancy A. Madden Johns Hopkins University
Robert E. Slavin
Robert E. Slavin Johns Hopkins University
Larry V. Hedges
Larry V. Hedges Northwestern University
Thomas D. Cook
Thomas D. Cook University of Wisconsin–Madison
Harris Cooper
Harris Cooper Duke University
Andrew Feenberg
Andrew Feenberg Simon Fraser University
Eileen Wood
Eileen Wood Wilfrid Laurier University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens diverse options for online study and career advancement. Many students seek flexible, cost-effective programs tailored to their personal and professional goals. If affordability is important, consider an affordable online psychology masters program, which balances quality education with lower tuition costs.

For those eager to fast-track their education, several schools offer accelerated edd options. These programs allow you to earn a doctoral degree in a shorter time frame and prepare you for leadership roles in education. Similarly, working professionals wanting a quick credential boost can look into 1 year master's programs online, which help students earn a graduate degree rapidly and reenter the workforce or pursue further study.

Undergraduate learners aiming to finish sooner can benefit from accelerated programs, completing a bachelor's degree in less time. All these online pathways offer the flexibility to balance studies with life and work, making them ideal for adult learners and career changers alike.

Best Scientists Citing Philip C. Abrami

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles