World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
66
Citations
15915
World Ranking
8650
National Ranking
226

J. Anton Grootegoed publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Anton Grootegoed sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 174 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

J. Anton Grootegoed D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Anton Grootegoed sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

J. Anton Grootegoed is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their academic profile reflects a career connected to this institution, contributing to the research and scholarly environment there.

Their work covers various aspects within their academic domain; however, specific details regarding subject areas, topics, and specialized fields were not provided in the available data.

There are no records of recent papers, including titles, years of publication, or venues, which limits insight into the latest research contributions by this scientist.

Information about frequent co-authors is not listed, which suggests either a focus on independent research or a lack of consolidated data on collaborative partners.

Similarly, there are no identified frequent publication venues or book publishers connected to this individual, which means patterns in dissemination channels cannot be established from the provided information.

Awards and recognitions have not been documented, leaving the external acknowledgments or honors in their academic career unreported here.

Overall, J. Anton Grootegoed is academically linked to Erasmus University Rotterdam, with no additional specifics on publications, research topics, or collaborative networks to detail.

Best Publications

  • Control of primordial follicle recruitment by anti-Müllerian hormone in the mouse ovary.

    Alexandra L. L. Durlinger;Piet Kramer;Bas Karels;Frank H. de Jong

  • Anti-Müllerian Hormone Inhibits Initiation of Primordial Follicle Growth in the Mouse Ovary

    Alexandra L. L. Durlinger;Maria J. G. Gruijters;Piet Kramer;Bas Karels

  • Anti-Müllerian Hormone Attenuates the Effects of FSH on Follicle Development in the Mouse Ovary

    Alexandra L. L. Durlinger;Maria J. G. Gruijters;Piet Kramer;Bas Karels

  • Inactivation of the HR6B Ubiquitin-Conjugating DNA Repair Enzyme in Mice Causes Male Sterility Associated with Chromatin Modification

    H.P Roest;J van Klaveren;J de Wit;C.G van Gurp

  • Spermatogonial Stem Cells

    Dirk G de Rooij;J Anton Grootegoed

  • Anti-androgens and the mutated androgen receptor of LNCaP cells: differential effects on binding affinity, heat-shock protein interaction, and transcription activation.

    Jos Veldscholte;Cor A. Berrevoets;Albert O. Brinkmann;J. Anton Grootegoed

  • Histone Ubiquitination and Chromatin Remodeling in Mouse Spermatogenesis

    Willy M Baarends;Jos W Hoogerbrugge;Henk P Roest;Marja Ooms

  • Silencing of unpaired chromatin and histone H2A ubiquitination in mammalian meiosis.

    Willy M. Baarends;Evelyne Wassenaar;Roald van der Laan;Jos Hoogerbrugge

  • RNF12 Is an X-Encoded Dose-Dependent Activator of X Chromosome Inactivation

    Iris Jonkers;Tahsin Stefan Barakat;Eskeatnaf Mulugeta Achame;Kim Monkhorst

  • RNF12 initiates X-chromosome inactivation by targeting REX1 for degradation

    Cristina Gontan;Eskeatnaf Mulugeta Achame;Jeroen Demmers;Tahsin Stefan Barakat

  • Involvement of insulin-like factor 3 (Insl3) in diethylstilbestrol-induced cryptorchidism

    Judith M. A. Emmen;Anke McLuskey;Ibrahim M. Adham;Wolfgang Engel

  • Differential Contributions of Mammalian Rad54 Paralogs to Recombination, DNA Damage Repair, and Meiosis

    Joanna Wesoly;Sheba Agarwal;Stefan Sigurdsson;Wendy Bussen

  • RNF12 activates Xist and is essential for X chromosome inactivation.

    Tahsin Stefan Barakat;Nilhan Gunhanlar;Cristina Gontan Pardo;Eskeatnaf Mulugeta Achame

  • Progesterone Inhibition of Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling in Normal Endometrium and Endometrial Cancer

    Yongyi Wang;Payman Hanifi-Moghaddam;Eline E. Hanekamp;Helenius J. Kloosterboer

  • Developmental Defects and Male Sterility in Mice Lacking the Ubiquitin-Like DNA Repair Gene mHR23B

    Jessica M. Y. Ng;Harry Vrieling;Kaoru Sugasawa;Marja P. Ooms

  • The ubiquitin-conjugating DNA repair enzyme HR6A is a maternal factor essential for early embryonic development in mice.

    Henk P. Roest;Willy M. Baarends;Jan de Wit;Jan W. van Klaveren

  • Characterization of the human androgen receptor transcription unit.

    P. W. Faber;H. C. J. Van Rooij;H. A. G. M. Van Der Korput;W. M. Baarends

  • Loss of HR6B ubiquitin-conjugating activity results in damaged synaptonemal complex structure and increased crossing-over frequency during the male meiotic prophase.

    Willy M. Baarends;Evelyne Wassenaar;Jos W. Hoogerbrugge;Gert van Cappellen

  • Follitropin receptor down-regulation involves a cAMP-dependent post-transcriptional decrease of receptor mRNA expression.

    A P Themmen;L J Blok;M Post;W M Baarends

  • Molecular and cellular mechanisms in spermatogenesis.

    J.Anton Grootegoed;Michel Siep;Willy M. Baarends

Frequent Co-Authors

Albert O. Brinkmann
Albert O. Brinkmann Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jan H.J. Hoeijmakers
Jan H.J. Hoeijmakers Erasmus University Rotterdam
Axel P. N. Themmen
Axel P. N. Themmen Erasmus University Rotterdam
Joost Gribnau
Joost Gribnau Erasmus University Rotterdam
Joop S.E. Laven
Joop S.E. Laven Erasmus University Rotterdam
Frank Grosveld
Frank Grosveld Erasmus University Rotterdam
Riccardo Fodde
Riccardo Fodde Erasmus MC
Niels Galjart
Niels Galjart Erasmus University Rotterdam
Hans V. Westerhoff
Hans V. Westerhoff Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Graduates in Biology and Biochemistry are in high demand across healthcare, research, and nutrition fields. For those looking to build specialized skills or expand their career options, there is a growing selection of flexible online programs available in the USA.

For registered nurses seeking advanced clinical training, online fnp programs offer a fast track to becoming Family Nurse Practitioners. Those interested in food science or community wellness can choose from many online dietetics programs that are both reputable and affordable.

BSN degrees are now essential for many nursing positions. Accelerated rn to bsn online programs can help professionals meet these new standards quickly and efficiently. Furthermore, if your interests lie in leadership or hospital administration, the fastest online master's in healthcare administration programs can position you for advanced roles.

Exploring these online options provides valuable career pathways for Biology and Biochemistry students, helping them stay competitive and adapt to the ever-changing healthcare landscape.

Best Scientists Citing J. Anton Grootegoed

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles