World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Genetics
Netherlands
2026
Award Badge
Molecular Biology
Netherlands
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 143 171 166 6 6 440 79829
Molecular Biology 143 108 95 3 3 440 79829

Jan H.J. Hoeijmakers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jan H.J. Hoeijmakers between 1974 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jan H.J. Hoeijmakers published across 53 years, from 1974 to 2026, averaging 9.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2008. 13 of the 516 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2008. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 2 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 6 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 6 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 11 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 15 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 19 publications 1997: 16 publications 1998: 17 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 17 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 12 publications 2026: 1 publication
1974 2026

516 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jan H.J. Hoeijmakers: publications per year, 1974 to 2026
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 1
1978 2
1979 1
1980 6
1981 3
1982 3
1983 2
1984 4
1985 3
1986 5
1987 3
1988 1
1989 6
1990 6
1991 11
1992 9
1993 10
1994 15
1995 13
1996 19
1997 16
1998 17
1999 13
2000 17
2001 15
2002 13
2003 14
2004 12
2005 15
2006 15
2007 9
2008 20
2009 13
2010 12
2011 17
2012 17
2013 18
2014 20
2015 11
2016 18
2017 14
2018 7
2019 7
2020 4
2021 6
2022 11
2023 15
2024 13
2025 12
2026 1
Total 516
Download as CSV

Jan H.J. Hoeijmakers publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan H.J. Hoeijmakers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 437–446 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 440 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20 440
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Jan H.J. Hoeijmakers D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan H.J. Hoeijmakers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 142–143 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 143 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7 143
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Genetics in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2026 - Research.com Molecular Biology in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Genetics in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Molecular Biology in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics and Molecular Biology in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Genetics in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Genetics and Molecular Biology in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2000 - Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 1998 - Spinoza Prize, Dutch Research Council
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)

Overview

Jan H.J. Hoeijmakers is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple fields within biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, with a focus on molecular biology, physiology, aging, genetics, and pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

The scientist's primary research topics include DNA repair mechanisms, genetics, aging, and longevity in model organisms, RNA research and splicing, mitochondrial function and pathology, diet and metabolism studies, dietary effects on health, and RNA modifications and cancer.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jan H.J. Hoeijmakers include Wilbert P. Vermeij, Sander Barnhoorn, Renata M. C. Brandt, Jan Vijg, and Ákos Gyenis.

Publications by Jan H.J. Hoeijmakers have appeared predominantly in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Nature, Aging Cell, Nature Aging, and Nature Genetics.

Notable recent papers include:

  • The central role of DNA damage in the ageing process, 2021, Nature
  • Genome-wide RNA polymerase stalling shapes the transcriptome during aging, 2023, Nature Genetics
  • ARDD 2020: from aging mechanisms to interventions, 2020, Aging
  • Protein instability associated with AARS1 and MARS1 mutations causes trichothiodystrophy, 2021, Human Molecular Genetics
  • Molecular and genetic insights into human ovarian aging from single-nuclei multi-omics analyses, 2024, Nature Aging

Jan H.J. Hoeijmakers has received several recognitions throughout their career, including membership in the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2000, the Spinoza Prize awarded by the Dutch Research Council in 1998, and membership in the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO).

Best Publications

  • Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer

    Jan H. J. Hoeijmakers

  • DNA Damage, Aging, and Cancer

    Jan H. J. Hoeijmakers

  • An Essential Role for Senescent Cells in Optimal Wound Healing through Secretion of PDGF-AA

    Marco Demaria;Naoko Ohtani;Sameh A Youssef;Francis Rodier

  • Chromosomal stability and the DNA double-stranded break connection.

    Dik C. van Gent;Jan H. J. Hoeijmakers;Roland Kanaar

  • Mammalian Cry1 and Cry2 are essential for maintenance of circadian rhythms.

    Gijsbertus T.J. Van Der Horst;Manja Muijtjens;Kumiko Kobayashi;Riya Takano

  • Molecular mechanism of nucleotide excision repair

    W. L. De Laat;N. G. J. Jaspers;J. H. J. Hoeijmakers

  • Targeted Apoptosis of Senescent Cells Restores Tissue Homeostasis in Response to Chemotoxicity and Aging

    Marjolein P. Baar;Renata M.C. Brandt;Diana A. Putavet;Julian D.D. Klein

  • Deficiencies in DNA damage repair limit the function of haematopoietic stem cells with age

    Derrick J Rossi;David Bryder;David Bryder;Jun Seita;Andre Nussenzweig

  • Understanding nucleotide excision repair and its roles in cancer and ageing

    Jurgen A. Marteijn;Hannes Lans;Wim Vermeulen;Jan H. J. Hoeijmakers

  • Xeroderma Pigmentosum Group C Protein Complex Is the Initiator of Global Genome Nucleotide Excision Repair

    Kaoru Sugasawa;Jessica M.Y Ng;Chikahide Masutani;Shigenori Iwai

  • DNA repair helicase: a component of BTF2 (TFIIH) basic transcription factor

    Laurent Schaeffer;Richard Roy;Sandrine Humbert;Vincent Moncollin

  • Sequential Assembly of the Nucleotide Excision Repair Factors In Vivo

    Marcel Volker;Martijn J Moné;Parimal Karmakar;Anneke van Hoffen

  • Nucleotide excision repair and human syndromes

    Jan de Boer;Jan H.J. Hoeijmakers

  • ERCC6, a member of a subfamily of putative helicases, is involved in Cockayne's syndrome and preferential repair of active genes.

    Christine Troelstra;Alain van Gool;Jan de Wit;Wim Vermeulen

  • Cellular senescence drives age-dependent hepatic steatosis.

    Mikolaj Ogrodnik;Satomi Miwa;Tamar Tchkonia;Dina Tiniakos;Dina Tiniakos

  • Aging and Genome Maintenance: Lessons from the Mouse?

    Paul Hasty;Judith Campisi;Judith Campisi;Jan Hoeijmakers;Harry van Steeg

  • Molecular mechanisms of DNA double-strand break repair

    Roland Kanaar;Jan H.J Hoeijmakers;Dik C van Gent

  • A new progeroid syndrome reveals that genotoxic stress suppresses the somatotroph axis

    Laura J. Niedernhofer;George A. Garinis;Anja Raams;Astrid S. Lalai

  • p53 modulation of TFIIH-associated nucleotide excision repair activity.

    Xin Wei Wang;H. Yeh;L. Schaeffer;Richard Roy

  • Xeroderma pigmentosum group F caused by a defect in a structure-specific DNA repair endonuclease

    Anneke M. Sijbers;Wouter L. De Laat;Rafael R. Ariza;Maureen Biggerstaff

Frequent Co-Authors

Wim Vermeulen
Wim Vermeulen Erasmus University Rotterdam
Dirk Bootsma
Dirk Bootsma Erasmus University Rotterdam
Gijsbertus T. J. van der Horst
Gijsbertus T. J. van der Horst Erasmus University Rotterdam
Nicolaas G. J. Jaspers
Nicolaas G. J. Jaspers Erasmus University Rotterdam
Roland Kanaar
Roland Kanaar Erasmus University Rotterdam
Harry van Steeg
Harry van Steeg Centre for Health Protection
Laura J. Niedernhofer
Laura J. Niedernhofer University of Minnesota
Jan Vijg
Jan Vijg Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Jan de Boer
Jan de Boer Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
Kaoru Sugasawa
Kaoru Sugasawa Kobe University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology opens doors to a variety of rewarding career paths. If you’re considering interdisciplinary options, speech-language pathology is an area with growing demand. For those interested, there are asha approved slp programs available online, ensuring education meets the rigorous standards required for professional practice.

If your background is not in communication sciences but you want to transition, consider speech language pathology bridge programs online. These programs are designed for non-SLP majors, providing a path to shift careers without restarting your academic journey from scratch.

For those considering healthcare, nursing is another strong option. Many schools now offer online absn programs for non nurses, accelerating your entry into the profession even if your undergraduate degree is in another field.

Specialized roles like psychiatric nurse practitioner are also appealing due to competitive salaries and mental health needs. If you’re curious about this path, explore current pmhnp salary trends by state to plan your next steps.

Best Scientists Citing Jan H.J. Hoeijmakers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles