World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Moshe Naveh-Benjamin

Moshe Naveh-Benjamin

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
13891
World Ranking
5134
National Ranking
2826

Moshe Naveh-Benjamin publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Moshe Naveh-Benjamin sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 130 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Moshe Naveh-Benjamin D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Moshe Naveh-Benjamin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Moshe Naveh-Benjamin is affiliated with the University of Missouri in the United States. Their primary area of research lies within neuroscience, with a specific focus on cognitive neuroscience. Their work intersects with experimental and cognitive psychology, artificial intelligence, social psychology, and developmental and educational psychology.

The topics that characterize their research include:

  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Philosophy and History of Science

Moshe Naveh-Benjamin has contributed to a range of peer-reviewed articles, some recent papers include:

  • The roles of attention, executive function and knowledge in cognitive ageing of working memory (2023), published in Nature Reviews Psychology
  • Adult age-related changes in the specificity of episodic memory representations: A review and theoretical framework (2023), published in Psychology and Aging
  • Online experimentation and sampling in cognitive aging research (2022), published in Psychology and Aging
  • How Do Scientific Views Change? Notes From an Extended Adversarial Collaboration (2020), published in Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • A Specificity Principle of Memory: Evidence From Aging and Associative Memory (2020), published in Psychological Science

The predominant publication venues for this scientist include:

  • Psychology and Aging
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Memory & Cognition
  • Psychological Science

Frequent coauthors in their publications are:

  • Nathaniel R. Greene
  • Nelson Cowan
  • Alicia Forsberg
  • Stephen Rhodes
  • Clément Belletier

Best Publications

  • Adult age differences in memory performance: Tests of an associative deficit hypothesis.

    Moshe Naveh-Benjamin

  • The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory

    Fergus I. M. Craik;Richard Govoni;Moshe Naveh-Benjamin;Nicole D. Anderson

  • Differential effects of age on item and associative measures of memory: a meta-analysis.

    Susan R. Old;Moshe Naveh-Benjamin

  • The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: 1. Evidence from divided attention costs.

    Nicole D. Anderson;Fergus I. M. Craik;Moshe Naveh-Benjamin

  • Adult age differences in episodic memory: further support for an associative-deficit hypothesis.

    Moshe Naveh-Benjamin;Zahra Hussain;Jonathan Guez;Maoz Bar-On

  • Test Anxiety: Deficits in Information Processing.

    Moshe Naveh-Benjamin;Wilbert J. McKeachie;Yi-guang Lin;Dorothy P. Holinger

  • The associative memory deficit of older adults: the role of strategy utilization.

    Moshe Naveh-Benjamin;Tamar Keshet Brav;Oded Levy

  • The associative memory deficit of older adults: further support using face-name associations.

    Moshe Naveh-Benjamin;Jonathan Guez;Angela Kilb;Sarah Reedy

  • Two types of test-anxious students: support for an information processing model

    Moshe Naveh-Benjamin;Wilbert J. McKeachie;Yi-guang Lin

  • Life-span development of visual working memory: when is feature binding difficult?

    Nelson Cowan;Moshe Naveh-Benjamin;Angela Kilb;J. Scott Saults

  • Divided Attention in Younger and Older Adults: Effects of Strategy and Relatedness on Memory Performance and Secondary Task Costs.

    Moshe Naveh-Benjamin;Fergus I. M. Craik;Jonathan Guez;Sharyn Kreuger

  • Digit span, reading rate, and linguistic relativity.

    Moshe Naveh-Benjamin;Thomas J. Ayres

  • A Comparison of Training Programs Intended for Different Types of Test-Anxious Students: Further Support for an Information-Processing Model.

    Moshe Naveh-Benjamin

  • Coding of spatial location information: an automatic process?

    Moshe Naveh-Benjamin

  • Effects of Divided Attention on Encoding and Retrieval Processes in Human Memory: Further Support for an Asymmetry

    Moshe Naveh-Benjamin;Fergus I. M. Craik;Jonathan Guez;Halit Dori

  • Inferring students' cognitive structures and their development using the "ordered tree technique."

    Moshe Naveh-Benjamin;Wilbert J. McKeachie;Yi-guang Lin;David G. Tucker

  • Maintenance rehearsal: a two-component analysis

    Moshe Naveh-Benjamin;John Jonides

  • The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: the resiliency of retrieval processes.

    Moshe Naveh-Benjamin;Fergus I. M. Craik;James G. Perretta;Simon T. Tonev

  • Estimating frequency of occurrence.

    John Jonides;Moshe Naveh-Benjamin

  • Adult age differences in memory for name-face associations: The effects of intentional and incidental learning.

    Moshe Naveh-Benjamin;Yee Lee Shing;Angela Kilb;Markus Werkle-Bergner

Frequent Co-Authors

Nelson Cowan
Nelson Cowan University of Missouri
Fergus I. M. Craik
Fergus I. M. Craik University of Toronto
Valérie Camos
Valérie Camos University of Fribourg
Pierre Barrouillet
Pierre Barrouillet University of Geneva
John Jonides
John Jonides University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Robert H. Logie
Robert H. Logie University of Edinburgh
Wilbert J. McKeachie
Wilbert J. McKeachie University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Nicole D. Anderson
Nicole D. Anderson University of Toronto
Lars Bäckman
Lars Bäckman Karolinska Institute
Jeffrey N. Rouder
Jeffrey N. Rouder University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees offers flexibility, accessibility, and a range of affordable options for aspiring professionals. When considering where to study, tuition costs can vary widely by state and institution. If you're searching for the cheapest psychology degrees in Bethlehem, you'll find several reputable programs that combine quality with affordability.

Students interested in studying in Florida can compare affordable psychology degrees in Boca Raton, featuring various online and hybrid options tailored to diverse learning needs. For those targeting the northeastern U.S., affordable psychology degrees in Boston can open up unique academic and networking opportunities.

On the West Coast, finding the cheapest psychology degrees in California can make an advanced psychology education accessible without overwhelming debt.

Graduates of these accredited programs can pursue careers in counseling, human resources, research, education, and more. Online degrees are especially suited for working adults or those seeking to balance studies with life commitments. Whether you're starting a new career or advancing current skills, these affordable options can help you achieve your goals in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Moshe Naveh-Benjamin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles