World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9527 8909 450 443 103 5414

Markus Werkle-Bergner publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Markus Werkle-Bergner between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Markus Werkle-Bergner published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2019. 10 of the 135 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2019. 2005: 4 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 6 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 4 publications
2005 2025

135 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Markus Werkle-Bergner: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 4
2006 2
2007 1
2008 1
2009 6
2010 3
2011 5
2012 4
2013 4
2014 3
2015 8
2016 3
2017 7
2018 9
2019 15
2020 15
2021 14
2022 8
2023 13
2024 6
2025 4
Total 135
Download as CSV

Markus Werkle-Bergner publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Werkle-Bergner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 103 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 103
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Markus Werkle-Bergner D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Werkle-Bergner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Markus Werkle-Bergner is affiliated with the Max Planck Institute for Human Development in Germany. Their research primarily centers on neuroscience, with a particular emphasis on cognitive neuroscience and related subfields.

The main fields of study covered in their work include:

  • Neuroscience

Within these broader fields, Werkle-Bergner's work addresses several specialized subfields:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Neurology

The major topics featured prominently in their research are:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Sleep and Wakefulness Research

They have authored multiple papers published across various scientific journals. Some recent papers include:

  • "Noradrenergic modulation of rhythmic neural activity shapes selective attention," 2021, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • "Locus coeruleus integrity is related to tau burden and memory loss in autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease," 2021, Neurobiology of Aging
  • "Understanding the interplay of sleep and aging: Methodological challenges," 2020, Psychophysiology
  • "Noradrenergic Responsiveness Supports Selective Attention across the Adult Lifespan," 2020, Journal of Neuroscience
  • "Locus coeruleus MRI contrast is associated with cortical thickness in older adults," 2020, Neurobiology of Aging

Werkle-Bergner frequently publishes in scientific venues including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Neurobiology of Aging
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • Psychophysiology

Their collaborative work involves regular partnerships with several researchers, notably:

  • Martin J. Dahl
  • Mara Mather
  • Myriam C. Sander
  • Ulman Lindenberger
  • Simone Kühn

Best Publications

  • Episodic memory across the lifespan : The contributions of associative and strategic components

    Yee Lee Shing;Markus Werkle-Bergner;Yvonne Brehmer;Viktor Müller

  • Associative and strategic components of episodic memory: a life-span dissociation.

    Yee Lee Shing;Markus Werkle-Bergner;Shu-Chen Li;Ulman Lindenberger

  • Peak individual alpha frequency qualifies as a stable neurophysiological trait marker in healthy younger and older adults

    Thomas H. Grandy;Markus Werkle-Bergner;Christian Chicherio;Florian Schmiedek

  • The influence of prior knowledge on memory: A developmental cognitive neuroscience perspective

    Garvin Brod;Markus Werkle-Bergner;Yee Lee Shing

  • Individual alpha peak frequency is related to latent factors of general cognitive abilities

    Thomas H. Grandy;Markus Werkle-Bergner;Christian Chicherio;Martin Lövdén

  • Precise Slow Oscillation-Spindle Coupling Promotes Memory Consolidation in Younger and Older Adults.

    Beate E. Muehlroth;Myriam C. Sander;Yana Fandakova;Thomas H. Grandy

  • Rostral locus coeruleus integrity is associated with better memory performance in older adults.

    Martin J. Dahl;Mara Mather;Sandra Düzel;Nils C. Bodammer

  • Lifespan age differences in working memory : A two-component framework

    Myriam C. Sander;Ulman Lindenberger;Markus Werkle-Bergner

  • Hippocampal subfield volumes : Age, vascular risk, and correlation with associative memory

    Yee Lee Shing;Karen M. Rodrigue;Kristen M. Kennedy;Yana Fandakova

  • Adult age differences in memory for name-face associations: The effects of intentional and incidental learning.

    Moshe Naveh-Benjamin;Yee Lee Shing;Angela Kilb;Markus Werkle-Bergner

  • Hippocampal Maturation Drives Memory from Generalization to Specificity

    Attila Keresztes;Chi T. Ngo;Ulman Lindenberger;Ulman Lindenberger;Markus Werkle-Bergner

  • Cortical EEG correlates of successful memory encoding : Implications for lifespan comparisons

    Markus Werkle-Bergner;Viktor Müller;Shu-Chen Li;Ulman Lindenberger

  • Noradrenergic modulation of rhythmic neural activity shapes selective attention

    Martin J. Dahl;Martin J. Dahl;Mara Mather;Markus Werkle-Bergner

  • Hippocampal maturity promotes memory distinctiveness in childhood and adolescence

    Attila Keresztes;Andrew R. Bender;Nils C. Bodammer;Ulman Lindenberger

  • Humans strategically shift decision bias by flexibly adjusting sensory evidence accumulation

    Niels A Kloosterman;Jan Willem de Gee;Jan Willem de Gee;Markus Werkle-Bergner;Ulman Lindenberger

  • Brain oscillatory correlates of working memory constraints

    Roman Freunberger;Markus Werkle-Bergner;Birgit Griesmayr;Ulman Lindenberger

  • Differences in the neural signature of remembering schema-congruent and schema-incongruent events

    Garvin Brod;Ulman Lindenberger;Markus Werkle-Bergner;Yee Lee Shing

  • Committing memory errors with high confidence: Older adults do but children don't

    Yee Lee Shing;Markus Werkle-Bergner;Shu-Chen Li;Ulman Lindenberger

  • Single-trial characterization of neural rhythms: Potential and challenges

    Julian Q. Kosciessa;Julian Q. Kosciessa;Thomas H. Grandy;Douglas D. Garrett;Markus Werkle-Bergner

  • Neuromodulation of associative and organizational plasticity across the life span: empirical evidence and neurocomputational modeling.

    Shu-Chen Li;Yvonne Brehmer;Yee Lee Shing;Markus Werkle-Bergner

  • Contralateral Delay Activity Reveals Life-Span Age Differences in Top-Down Modulation of Working Memory Contents

    Myriam C. Sander;Markus Werkle-Bergner;Ulman Lindenberger

Frequent Co-Authors

Ulman Lindenberger
Ulman Lindenberger Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Yee Lee Shing
Yee Lee Shing Goethe University Frankfurt
Mara Mather
Mara Mather University of Southern California
Shu-Chen Li
Shu-Chen Li TU Dresden
Simone Kühn
Simone Kühn Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Björn Rasch
Björn Rasch University of Fribourg
Martin Lövdén
Martin Lövdén University of Gothenburg
Florian Schmiedek
Florian Schmiedek Max Planck Society
Naftali Raz
Naftali Raz Stony Brook University
Angela D. Friederici
Angela D. Friederici Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA opens doors to numerous specialized online degrees and dynamic career pathways. Students can pursue advanced programs in behavioral, neuro, military, and organizational psychology, each offering unique roles and workplace settings.

For example, a masters in behavioral psychology average salary is often competitive, as professionals are in demand in healthcare, education, and social services. If you are interested in understanding how the brain influences behavior, there are varied types of jobs in neuropsychology to consider—ranging from research to clinical assessment across hospitals and research institutions.

The field of military psychology is also growing, with an encouraging military psychology job outlook supporting both active service members and veterans. Meanwhile, those focused on workplace behavior and improving organizational culture may find exciting opportunities in organizational psychology careers.

Each of these online degrees blends foundational theory with real-world practice, allowing graduates to shape rewarding and impactful careers in today’s diverse settings.

Best Scientists Citing Markus Werkle-Bergner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles