World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
67
Citations
31182
World Ranking
2818
National Ranking
1307

Wayne M. Clark publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wayne M. Clark sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 192 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Wayne M. Clark D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wayne M. Clark sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Intra-arterial Prourokinase for Acute Ischemic Stroke: The PROACT II Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Anthony Furlan;Randall Higashida;Lawrence Wechsler;Michael Gent

  • Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Treatment of Carotid-Artery Stenosis

    Thomas G. Brott;Thomas G. Brott;Robert W. Hobson;George Howard;Gary S. Roubin

  • Endovascular Therapy after Intravenous t-PA versus t-PA Alone for Stroke

    Joseph P Broderick;Yuko Y Palesch;Andrew M Demchuk;Sharon D Yeatts

  • Recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (Alteplase) for ischemic stroke 3 to 5 hours after symptom onset. The ATLANTIS Study: a randomized controlled trial. Alteplase Thrombolysis for Acute Noninterventional Therapy in Ischemic Stroke.

    Wayne M. Clark;Stanley Wissman;Gregory W. Albers;Jack H. Jhamandas

  • Pioglitazone after Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack

    W. N. Kernan;C. M. Viscoli;K. L. Furie;L. H. Young

  • Intravenous Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator for Treatment of Acute Stroke: The Standard Treatment with Alteplase to Reverse Stroke (STARS) Study

    Gregory W. Albers;Vernice E. Bates;Wayne M. Clark;Rodney Bell

  • Combined Intravenous and Intra-Arterial r-TPA Versus Intra-Arterial Therapy of Acute Ischemic Stroke Emergency Management of Stroke (EMS) Bridging Trial

    Christopher A. Lewandowski;Michael Frankel;Thomas A. Tomsick;Joseph Broderick

  • Long-Term Results of Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Carotid-Artery Stenosis

    Thomas G. Brott;George Howard;Gary S. Roubin;James F. Meschia

  • The rtPA (Alteplase) 0- to 6-Hour Acute Stroke Trial, Part A (A0276g) Results of a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study

    Wayne M. Clark;Gregory W. Albers;Kenneth P. Madden;Scott Hamilton

  • Oral Citicoline in Acute Ischemic Stroke An Individual Patient Data Pooling Analysis of Clinical Trials

    Antoni Dávalos;José Castillo;José Álvarez-Sabín;Julio J. Secades

  • Safety and efficacy of NA-1 in patients with iatrogenic stroke after endovascular aneurysm repair (ENACT): a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    Michael D Hill;Renee H Martin;David Mikulis;John H Wong

  • Penumbral imaging and functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy versus medical therapy: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data

    Bruce C V Campbell;Charles B L M Majoie;Gregory W Albers;Bijoy K Menon

  • Safety of Stenting and Endarterectomy by Symptomatic Status in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial (CREST)

    Frank L. Silver;Ariane Mackey;Wayne M. Clark;William Brooks

  • Safety and efficacy of multipotent adult progenitor cells in acute ischaemic stroke (MASTERS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

    David C Hess;Lawrence R Wechsler;Wayne M Clark;Sean I Savitz

  • Monofilament intraluminal middle cerebral artery occlusion in the mouse.

    Wayne M. Clark;Nikola S. Lessov;Michael P. Dixon;Felix Eckenstein

  • A phase III randomized efficacy trial of 2000 mg citicoline in acute ischemic stroke patients

    W. M. Clark;L. R. Wechsler;L. A. Sabounjian;U. E. Schwiderski

  • Interleukin-6 and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in acute stroke.

    Nancy B. Beamer;Nancy B. Beamer;Bruce M. Coull;Bruce M. Coull;Wayne M. Clark;J. Samantha Hazel

  • A Randomized Efficacy Trial of Citicoline in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

    Wayne M. Clark;Benjamin J. Williams;Kenneth A. Selzer;Richard M. Zweifler

  • Safety and tolerability of the glutamate antagonist CGS 19755 (Selfotel) in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Results of a phase IIa randomized trial.

    J Grotta;W Clark;B Coull;L C Pettigrew

  • A randomized dose-response trial of citicoline in acute ischemic stroke patients

    Wayne M. Clark;Steve Warach;L. C. Pettigrew;R. E. Gammans

  • Reduction of central nervous system ischemic injury by monoclonal antibody to intercellular adhesion molecule.

    Wayne M. Clark;Ken P. Madden;Robert Rothlein;Justin A. Zivin

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas G. Brott
Thomas G. Brott Mayo Clinic
Justin A. Zivin
Justin A. Zivin University of California, San Diego
Michael D. Hill
Michael D. Hill University of Calgary
Virginia J. Howard
Virginia J. Howard University of Alabama at Birmingham
George Howard
George Howard University of Alabama at Birmingham
Tudor G. Jovin
Tudor G. Jovin Cooper University Hospital
Reza Jahan
Reza Jahan University of California, Los Angeles
Gregory W. Albers
Gregory W. Albers Stanford University
James F. Meschia
James F. Meschia Mayo Clinic
Gary S. Roubin
Gary S. Roubin University of Alabama at Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience in the USA opens doors to a range of connected fields and flexible online degrees. If you’re interested in applying your neuroscience background to mental health or behavioral sciences, you might consider pursuing one of the most affordable online psychology degree programs. These options offer a cost-effective path toward earning a degree that compliments neuroscience knowledge.

For those aiming for advanced or clinical practice, there are accelerated programs to explore. The 1 year online master's in social work can help you quickly prepare for a career in social services or counseling. Similarly, if you want to specialize in clinical psychology, the shortest online psyd programs can guide you toward practitioner roles in mental health care.

Another relevant option is marriage and family therapy. Obtaining credentials through an mft online degree provides training in supporting families and couples, which is a growing area of need. By exploring these pathways, neuroscience students can tailor their careers to diverse roles in research, therapy, and community support.

Best Scientists Citing Wayne M. Clark

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles