World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 46 6276 5837 637 605 136 19817

Jeremy Dawson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jeremy Dawson between 1999 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jeremy Dawson published across 28 years, from 1999 to 2026, averaging 7.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2017. 14 of the 212 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2017. 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 13 publications 2026: 1 publication
1999 2026

212 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jeremy Dawson: publications per year, 1999 to 2026
Year Publications
1999 2
2000 1
2001 3
2002 3
2003 4
2004 4
2005 6
2006 11
2007 5
2008 8
2009 5
2010 5
2011 10
2012 7
2013 4
2014 13
2015 5
2016 4
2017 16
2018 12
2019 14
2020 6
2021 15
2022 15
2023 8
2024 12
2025 13
2026 1
Total 212
Download as CSV

Jeremy Dawson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeremy Dawson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 136 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 136
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jeremy Dawson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeremy Dawson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 46
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jeremy Dawson is affiliated with the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom. Their research spans several domains within medicine, with a focus on interdisciplinary approaches to health, organizational behavior, and computational methods.

The primary field of study for Jeremy Dawson is Medicine, with a total of 55 publications. Their work also covers diverse subfields including:

  • General Health Professions
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Emergency Medicine

Research topics explored by Jeremy Dawson include:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Face Recognition and Analysis
  • Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Frequent publication venues highlight where Dawson's work is regularly disseminated:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings (11 publications)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (8 publications)
  • Brain Injury (4 publications)
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (3 publications)
  • BMC Health Services Research (3 publications)

Frequently collaborating co-authors include Neil Lawrence, Nils Krone, Nasser M. Nasrabadi, Rajiv Singh, and Irina Bacila, with collaboration counts ranging from 6 to 12 jointly produced works.

Representative recent publications by Jeremy Dawson include:

  • Evaluating the Use of Covariance-Based Structural Equation Modelling with Reflective Measurement in Organizational and Management Research: A Review and Recommendations for Best Practice, 2020, published in British Journal of Management
  • Search committee diversity and applicant pool representation of women and underrepresented minorities: A quasi-experimental field study, 2021, published in Journal of Applied Psychology
  • What about me? The impact of employee change agents' person-role fit on their job satisfaction during organisational change, 2020, published in Work & Stress
  • Effectiveness of a symptom-clinic intervention delivered by general practitioners with an extended role for people with multiple and persistent physical symptoms in England: the Multiple Symptoms Study 3 pragmatic, multicentre, parallel-group, individually randomised controlled trial, 2024, published in The Lancet
  • The effect of socioeconomic deprivation on 12 month Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) outcome, 2020, published in Brain Injury

Best Publications

  • Moderation in Management Research: What, Why, When, and How

    Jeremy F. Dawson

  • Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: development and application of a slope difference test.

    Jeremy F. Dawson;Andreas W. Richter

  • Validating the organizational climate measure: links to managerial practices, productivity and innovation

    Malcolm G. Patterson;Michael A. West;Viv J. Shackleton;Jeremy F. Dawson

  • HRM as a predictor of innovation

    Helen Shipton;Michael A. West;Jeremy Dawson;Kamal Birdi

  • Leadership clarity and team innovation in health care

    Michael A West;Michael A West;Carol S Borrill;Jeremy F Dawson;Jeremy F Dawson;Felix Brodbeck

  • Building work engagement: A systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the effectiveness of work engagement interventions

    Caroline Knight;Malcolm Patterson;Jeremy Dawson

  • Boundary spanners' identification, intergroup contact, and effective intergroup relations

    Andreas W. Richter;Michael A. West;Rolf van Dick;Jeremy F. Dawson

  • Culture and behaviour in the English National Health Service: overview of lessons from a large multimethod study

    Mary Dixon-Woods;Richard Baker;Kathryn Charles;Jeremy Dawson

  • The link between the management of employees and patient mortality in acute hospitals

    Michael A. West;Carol Borrill;Jeremy F. Dawson;Judy W. Scully

  • Team Reflexivity and Innovation The Moderating Role of Team Context

    Michaéla C. Schippers;Michael A. West;Jeremy F. Dawson

  • Harnessing demographic differences in organizations: What moderates the effects of workplace diversity?

    Yves R.F. Guillaume;Jeremy F. Dawson;Lilian Otaye-Ebede;Stephen A. Woods

  • A test of basic assumptions of Affective Events Theory (AET) in call centre work

    Jurgen Wegge;Rolf van Dick;Gary K. Fisher;Michael A. West

  • Reducing patient mortality in hospitals: the role of human resource management

    Michael A. West;James P. Guthrie;Jeremy F. Dawson;Carol S. Borrill

  • Diversity faultlines, shared objectives, and top management team performance

    Daan van Knippenberg;Jeremy F Dawson;Michael A West;Astrid C Homan

  • It's what you do and the way that you do it: Team task, team size, and innovation-related group processes

    Luis A. Curral;Rosalind H. Forrester;Jeremy F. Dawson;Michael A. West

  • Benevolent Sexism at Work Gender Differences in the Distribution of Challenging Developmental Experiences

    Eden B. King;Whitney Botsford;Michelle R. Hebl;Stephanie Kazama

  • The effectiveness of health care teams in the National Health Service

    Michael West;Carol S. Borrill;J. Carletta;Jeremy Dawson

  • Breast cancer teams: the impact of constitution, new cancer workload, and methods of operation on their effectiveness

    R Haward;Z Amir;C Borrill;Jeremy Dawson

  • Large scale organisational intervention to improve patient safety in four UK hospitals: mixed method evaluation

    Amirta Benning;Maisoon Ghaleb;Anu Kristiina Suokas;Mary Dixon-Woods

  • When promoting positive feelings pays: Aggregate job satisfaction, work design features, and innovation in manufacturing organizations

    Helen J. Shipton;Michael A. West;Carole L. Parkes;Jeremy F. Dawson

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael West
Michael West Duke University
Martin Powell
Martin Powell University of Birmingham
Eden B. King
Eden B. King Rice University
Patrick C. Flood
Patrick C. Flood Dublin City University
Graham P. Martin
Graham P. Martin University of Cambridge
Mary Dixon-Woods
Mary Dixon-Woods University of Cambridge
Richard Baker
Richard Baker University of Leicester
Rolf van Dick
Rolf van Dick Goethe University Frankfurt
Walid El Ansari
Walid El Ansari University of Gloucestershire
Michelle R. Hebl
Michelle R. Hebl Rice University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up a range of related online degrees and diverse career pathways, especially for those interested in social work. Across the United States, each state has specific requirements for entering this field. For example, the social worker education requirements in Nevada highlight the need for degrees that are recognized by local licensing bodies.

If you're considering a career in social work while studying psychology, it’s crucial to be aware of local regulations. For those looking at opportunities in New England, discover how the New Hampshire education requirements for social workers shape degree choices and licensure options.

Many programs allow for online study, providing flexibility for both undergraduate and graduate degrees. In the northeast, it’s valuable to know the degree needed to be a social worker in New Jersey as you plan your career. Similarly, those exploring options in the Southwest can review the New Mexico education requirements for social workers for a clear path forward.

Whether you’re interested in clinical practice, research, or advocacy, researching these pathways will help you select the best degree and prepare for state licensure requirements.

Best Scientists Citing Jeremy Dawson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles