World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 103 7415 6967 721 687 584 35560

Richard Baker publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard Baker between 1980 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard Baker published across 45 years, from 1980 to 2024, averaging 14.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 66 publications in 2014. 1 of the 634 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 66. Peak 66 publications in 2014. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 6 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 14 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 18 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 21 publications 2000: 20 publications 2001: 19 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 21 publications 2006: 25 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 23 publications 2009: 29 publications 2010: 28 publications 2011: 28 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 30 publications 2014: 66 publications 2015: 50 publications 2016: 28 publications 2017: 26 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1980 2024

634 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard Baker: publications per year, 1980 to 2024
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 1
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 3
1991 1
1992 6
1993 7
1994 2
1995 14
1996 10
1997 18
1998 5
1999 21
2000 20
2001 19
2002 12
2003 12
2004 9
2005 21
2006 25
2007 20
2008 23
2009 29
2010 28
2011 28
2012 21
2013 30
2014 66
2015 50
2016 28
2017 26
2018 25
2019 20
2020 17
2021 14
2022 0
2023 0
2024 1
Total 634
Download as CSV

Richard Baker publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Baker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 581–600 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 584 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509 584
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard Baker D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Baker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 102–103 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630 103
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Richard Baker is affiliated with the University of Leicester in the United Kingdom and focuses on research primarily within the fields of Engineering and Medicine. Their work involves interdisciplinary approaches bridging Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Clinical Psychology, and Rheumatology.

Their research topics cover a range of areas including:

  • Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
  • Fungal and yeast genetics research

Recent publications by Richard Baker demonstrate a focus on musculoskeletal mechanics, prosthetics, and cellular biology. Notable papers include:

  • Higher knee contact forces might underlie increased osteoarthritis rates in high functioning amputees: A pilot study (2020), Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
  • Effect of different walking speeds on joint and muscle force estimation using AnyBody and OpenSim (2021), Gait & Posture
  • Addressing unpredictability may be the key to improving performance with current clinically prescribed myoelectric prostheses (2021), Scientific Reports
  • Dbf4-Dependent Kinase (DDK)-Mediated Proteolysis of CENP-A Prevents Mislocalization of CENP-A in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (2020), G3 Genes Genomes Genetics
  • Using the spring-mass model for running: Force-length curves and foot-strike patterns (2020), Gait & Posture

Richard Baker regularly publishes in these venues:

  • Gait & Posture
  • Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
  • Scientific Reports
  • G3 Genes Genomes Genetics
  • Early Intervention in Psychiatry

The scientist works with various coauthors including Ziyun Ding, Hannah Jarvis, Alexander N. Bennett, Anthony M. J. Bull, and Nathalie Alexander.

In recognition of contributions to science, Richard Baker was awarded the title Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2009.

Best Publications

  • The reliability of three-dimensional kinematic gait measurements: a systematic review.

    Jennifer McGinley;Richard Baker;Rory St John Wolfe;Rory St John Wolfe;Meg E Morris;Meg E Morris

  • A checklist for identifying determinants of practice: A systematic review and synthesis of frameworks and taxonomies of factors that prevent or enable improvements in healthcare professional practice

    Signe Flottorp;Andrew David Oxman;Jane Krause;Nyokabi R. Musila

  • Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice

    Richard Baker;Janette Camosso-Stefinovic;Clare Gillies;Elizabeth J Shaw

  • Gait analysis methods in rehabilitation.

    Richard Baker

  • An implementation research agenda

    Martin P Eccles;David Armstrong;Richard Baker;Kevin Cleary

  • Culture and behaviour in the English National Health Service: overview of lessons from a large multimethod study

    Mary Dixon-Woods;Richard Baker;Kathryn Charles;Jeremy Dawson

  • Continuity of care and trust in one's physician: evidence from primary care in the United States and the United Kingdom.

    A G Mainous rd;R Baker;M M Love;D P Gray

  • The changing profile of acute tubulointerstitial nephritis

    Richard J. Baker;Charles D. Pusey

  • Quantification of soft tissue artifact in lower limb human motion analysis: A systematic review

    Alana Peters;Alana Peters;Brook Galna;Brook Galna;Morgan Sangeux;Meg Morris;Meg Morris

  • Corroboration among Data Sets in Simultaneous Analysis: Hidden Support for Phylogenetic Relationships among Higher Level Artiodactyl Taxa

    John Gatesy;Patrick O'Grady;Richard H. Baker

  • Effectiveness of screening and monitoring tests for diabetic retinopathy : a systematic review

    A. Hutchinson;A. McIntosh;J. Peters;C. O'keeffe

  • Reliability and validity of a new measure of patient satisfaction with out of hours primary medical care in the united kingdom: development of a patient questionnaire

    Robert K McKinley;Terjinder Manku-Scott;Adrian M Hastings;David P French

  • Assessing the relative contribution of molecular and morphological characters in simultaneous analysis trees.

    Richard H. Baker;Xiaobo Yu;Rob DeSalle

  • What do we know about how to do audit and feedback? Pitfalls in applying evidence from a systematic review

    R. Foy;M.P. Eccles;G. Jamtvedt;J. Young

  • Nitric oxide prevents a pathogen-permissive granulocytic inflammation during tuberculosis.

    Bibhuti B. Mishra;Rustin R. Lovewell;Andrew J. Olive;Guoliang Zhang

  • Biomechanical response to hamstring muscle strain injury

    Anthony G. Schache;Tim V. Wrigley;Richard Baker;Richard Baker;Marcus G. Pandy

  • Quality improvement research: understanding the science of change in health care

    Richard Grol;Richard Baker;Fiona Moss

  • Loss of Direct and Maintenance of Indirect Alloresponses in Renal Allograft Recipients: Implications for the Pathogenesis of Chronic Allograft Nephropathy

    Richard J. Baker;Maria P. Hernandez-Fuentes;Paul A. Brookes;Afzal N. Chaudhry

  • Exploration of the relationship between continuity, trust in regular doctors and patient satisfaction with consultations with family doctors.

    Richard Baker;Arch G. Mainous;Denis Pereira Gray;Margaret M. Love

  • Scm3, an essential Saccharomyces cerevisiae centromere protein required for G2/M progression and Cse4 localization.

    Sam Stoler;Kelly Rogers;Scott Weitze;Lisa Morey

Frequent Co-Authors

Mary Boulton
Mary Boulton Oxford Brookes University
Meg E. Morris
Meg E. Morris La Trobe University
Christopher M. Sassetti
Christopher M. Sassetti University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Arch G. Mainous
Arch G. Mainous University of Florida
Ian D. Graham
Ian D. Graham Ottawa Hospital
Christopher R Burton
Christopher R Burton University of Sheffield
Gill Harvey
Gill Harvey University of Adelaide
Sue Dopson
Sue Dopson University of Oxford
Gerald S. Wilkinson
Gerald S. Wilkinson University of Maryland, College Park
Rob DeSalle
Rob DeSalle American Museum of Natural History

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Looking to expand your career options beyond a traditional medical degree? There are several online pathways in healthcare that offer flexibility and diverse professional opportunities. For those interested in advanced nursing roles, online direct entry msn programs allow non-nurses to fast-track their way into leadership and specialty nursing positions.

If you're seeking an accessible entry point into nursing, consider exploring online adn programs, which often have flexible admission requirements and quicker graduation timelines. Some students may also benefit from a nursing school that doesn't require teas, making the admissions process much simpler.

Not all healthcare careers involve direct patient care. For example, those interested in administrative or technical roles can pursue medical coding and billing classes online with financial aid. These programs open up opportunities to work in various healthcare settings and support the industry behind the scenes.

Exploring these alternative and online degrees can help you find a pathway that fits your career goals, lifestyle, and interests.

Best Scientists Citing Richard Baker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles