World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
20516
World Ranking
6982
National Ranking
3058

Pankaj Jaiswal publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pankaj Jaiswal sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 108 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Pankaj Jaiswal D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pankaj Jaiswal sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pankaj Jaiswal is affiliated with Oregon State University in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Their work spans multiple areas including Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Genetics, Artificial Intelligence, and Information Systems.

Their research topics encompass a range of subjects such as:

  • Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis
  • Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Plant Molecular Biology Research

Jaiswal's frequent co-authors include:

  • Sushma Naithani
  • Justin Elser
  • Parul Gupta
  • Laurel Cooper
  • Justin Preece

In terms of publication venues, they have most often published in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nucleic Acids Research
  • Frontiers in Plant Science
  • Genes
  • mSystems

Notable recent papers include:

  • "The Gene Ontology knowledgebase in 2023" (2023), published in Genetics
  • "Ensembl Genomes 2022: an expanding genome resource for non-vertebrates" (2021), published in Nucleic Acids Research
  • "Gramene 2021: harnessing the power of comparative genomics and pathways for plant research" (2020), published in Nucleic Acids Research
  • "The Ontologies Community of Practice: A CGIAR Initiative for Big Data in Agrifood Systems" (2020), published in Patterns
  • "Microbiome Metadata Standards: Report of the National Microbiome Data Collaborative's Workshop and Follow-On Activities" (2021), published in mSystems

Best Publications

  • The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource.

    Harris Ma;Clark J;Ireland A;Lomax J

  • The Gene Ontology resource: enriching a GOld mine

    Seth Carbon;Eric Douglass;Benjamin M Good

  • The Gene Ontology knowledgebase in 2023

    Unknown

  • The Gene Ontology project in 2008

    Midori A Harris;Jennifer I. Deegan;Amelia Ireland;Jane Lomax

  • Expression Atlas update—an integrated database of gene and protein expression in humans, animals and plants

    Robert Petryszak;Maria Keays;Y. Amy Tang;Nuno A. Fonseca

  • The Gene Ontology in 2010: Extensions and refinements

    Tanya Z. Berardini;Varsha K. Khodiyar;Ruth C. Lovering;Philippa Talmud

  • Ensembl Genomes 2020-enabling non-vertebrate genomic research.

    Kevin L. Howe;Bruno Contreras-Moreira;Nishadi De Silva;Gareth Maslen

  • Gene Ontology Consortium. The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource

    Harris Ma;J. Clark;A. Ireland;J. Lomax

  • Expression Atlas: gene and protein expression across multiple studies and organisms.

    Irene Papatheodorou;Nuno A. Fonseca;Maria Keays;Y. Amy Tang

  • Ensembl Genomes 2022: an expanding genome resource for non-vertebrates.

    Andrew D Yates;James Allen;Ridwan M Amode;Andrey G Azov

  • Gramene: a resource for comparative grass genomics

    Doreen Ware;Pankaj Jaiswal;Junjian Ni;Xiaokang Pan

  • Gramene, a tool for grass genomics.

    Doreen H. Ware;Pankaj Jaiswal;Junjian Ni;Immanuel V. Yap

  • Finding Our Way through Phenotypes.

    Andrew R. Deans;Suzanna E. Lewis;Eva Huala;Salvatore S. Anzaldo

  • Plant Ontology (PO): a Controlled Vocabulary of Plant Structures and Growth Stages

    Pankaj Jaiswal;Shulamit Avraham;Katica Ilic;Elizabeth A. Kellogg

  • Gramene 2013: comparative plant genomics resources

    Marcela K. Monaco;Joshua C. Stein;Sushma Naithani;Sharon Wei

  • The Plant Ontology Database: a community resource for plant structure and developmental stages controlled vocabulary and annotations.

    Shulamit Avraham;Chih-Wei Tung;Katica Ilic;Pankaj Jaiswal

  • Gramene database in 2010: updates and extensions

    Ken Youens-Clark;Edward S. Buckler;Terry M. Casstevens;Charles Chen

  • Gramene: a growing plant comparative genomics resource

    Chengzhi Liang;Pankaj Jaiswal;Claire Hebbard;Shuly Avraham

  • The Planteome database:: an integrated resource for reference ontologies, plant genomics and phenomics

    Laurel Cooper;Austin Meier;Marie-Angélique Laporte;Justin L Elser

  • The Plant Ontology as a Tool for Comparative Plant Anatomy and Genomic Analyses

    Laurel Cooper;Ramona L. Walls;Justin Elser;María A. Gandolfo

  • Gramene 2018: unifying comparative genomics and pathway resources for plant research.

    Marcela K. Tello-Ruiz;Sushma Naithani;Joshua C. Stein;Parul Gupta

Frequent Co-Authors

Doreen Ware
Doreen Ware Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Christopher J. Mungall
Christopher J. Mungall Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Lincoln Stein
Lincoln Stein Ontario Institute for Cancer Research
Susan R. McCouch
Susan R. McCouch Cornell University
Gerard R. Lazo
Gerard R. Lazo Agricultural Research Service
Seung Y. Rhee
Seung Y. Rhee Carnegie Institution for Science
Barry Smith
Barry Smith University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Peter F. Stevens
Peter F. Stevens Missouri Botanical Garden
Michael Ashburner
Michael Ashburner University of Cambridge
Paul Kersey
Paul Kersey European Bioinformatics Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Computer Science degree in the USA can open doors to many related fields, especially as technology transforms industries. Students interested in broadening their expertise may explore interdisciplinary options available through affordable online programs.

For example, the strong mathematical foundation of computer science aligns well with engineering fields. You might consider an online environmental engineering degree, which combines technology with sustainability solutions. Similarly, online mechanical engineering degrees offer insights into robotics and automation—areas closely related to computer science.

Physics is another complementary pathway. Some of the best online physics degree programs provide strong analytical and problem-solving skills that overlap with computing careers.

Lastly, data-driven technology roles are in high demand. Numerous data science programs are available online, helping students build expertise in AI, analytics, and big data—key skills for thriving in the tech industry.

Best Scientists Citing Pankaj Jaiswal

Trending Scientists