World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
39
Citations
6302
World Ranking
5677
National Ranking
948

Mary Boulton publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Boulton sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 144 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Mary Boulton D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Boulton sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mary Boulton is a researcher affiliated with Oxford Brookes University in the United Kingdom. Their work is primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with particular focus on Psychiatry and Mental Health, Physiology, Rehabilitation, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Epidemiology.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Physical Activity and Health
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Nursing education and management

Mary Boulton has contributed to several peer-reviewed publications, with recent papers including:

  • Experiences of fatigue in daily life of people with acquired brain injury: a qualitative study, 2020, Disability and Rehabilitation
  • Physiotherapists' perceptions of how patient adherence and non-adherence to recommended exercise for musculoskeletal conditions affects their practice: a qualitative study, 2021, Physiotherapy
  • Boundary spanning and identity work in the clinical research delivery workforce: a qualitative study of research nurses, midwives and allied health professionals in the National Health Service, United Kingdom, 2021, Health Research Policy and Systems
  • The AERO study: A feasibility randomised controlled trial of individually tailored exercise adherence strategies based on a brief behavioural assessment for older people with musculoskeletal conditions, 2022, Physiotherapy
  • Can a brief behavioural assessment improve exercise adherence in older people with musculoskeletal conditions? A feasibility randomised controlled trial, 2020, Physiotherapy

Frequent publication venues for the researcher include:

  • Physiotherapy
  • Disability and Rehabilitation
  • Health Research Policy and Systems

Mary Boulton has collaborated extensively with several co-authors, including:

  • Helen Dawes
  • Jonathan Room
  • Karen Barker
  • Kirsty Archer
  • Leisle Ezekiel

Best Publications

  • Cancer patients' information needs and information seeking behaviour: in depth interview study

    Geraldine M Leydon;Mary Boulton;Clare Moynihan;Alison Jones

  • Qualitative methods for assessing health care.

    R Fitzpatrick;M Boulton

  • On Being a Mother: A Study of Women with Pre-School Children

    Mary Georgina Boulton

  • Changing constructions of informed consent: qualitative research and complex social worlds.

    Tina Miller;Mary G Boulton

  • The information needs of partners and family members of cancer patients: a systematic literature review.

    Eike Adams;Mary Boulton;Eila Watson

  • Do patients value continuity of care in general practice? An investigation using stated preference discrete choice experiments

    David A. Turner;Carolyn Clare Tarrant;Kate C. Windridge;Stirling Bryan

  • Qualitative study of the meaning of personal care in general practice

    Carolyn Clare Tarrant;Kate C. Windridge;Mary Boulton;Richard Baker

  • Regular partners and risky behaviour: Why do gay men have unprotected intercourse?

    J McLean;M Boulton;M Brookes;D Lakhani

  • Qualitative research in health care: II. A structured review and evaluation of studies.

    Mary Boulton;Ray Fitzpatrick;Clare Swinburn

  • Characteristics, Interventions, and Outcomes of Women Who Used a Birthing Pool: A Prospective Observational Study

    Ethel E. Burns;Mary G. Boulton;Elizabeth Cluett;Victoria R. Cornelius

  • A new approach to the measurement of patients' understanding of what they are told in medical consultations.

    David A. Tuckett;Mary Boulton;Coral Olson

  • Qualitative research in health care: I. The scope and validity of methods

    Ray Fitzpatrick;Mary Boulton

  • Gay men's accounts of unsafe sex.

    M. Boulton;J. Mclean;R. Fitzpatrick;G. Hart

  • Partners and close family members of long-term cancer survivors: Health status, psychosocial well-being and unmet supportive care needs

    Daniel Turner;Eike Adams;Mary Boulton;Sian Harrison

  • Faith, hope, and charity: an in-depth interview study of cancer patients' information needs and information-seeking behavior

    Geraldine M. Leydon;Mary Boulton;Clare Moynihan;Alison Jones

  • Interpersonal continuity of care: a cross-sectional survey of primary care patients' preferences and their experiences.

    Richard Baker;Mary Boulton;Kate C. Windridge;Carolyn Clare Tarrant

  • Informed consent in a changing environment.

    Mary Boulton;Michael Parker

  • Awareness of sexual partners' HIV status as an influence upon high-risk sexual behaviour among gay men

    J M Dawson;R M Fitzpatrick;G Reeves;M Boulton

  • Investigating women's preferences for intrapartum care: home versus hospital births.

    Louise Longworth;Julie Ratcliffe;Mary Boulton

  • Factors associated with intentional and unintentional non-adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy following breast cancer.

    Jo Brett;Deborah F. Fenlon;Mary Boulton;Nicholas J. Hulbert-Williams

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Baker
Richard Baker University of Leicester
Graham Hart
Graham Hart University College London
Ray Fitzpatrick
Ray Fitzpatrick University of Oxford
Klim McPherson
Klim McPherson University of Oxford
Peter Donnelly
Peter Donnelly University of Oxford
Jennifer Beecham
Jennifer Beecham University of Kent
Robert Williamson
Robert Williamson University of Melbourne
Christopher W. Pugh
Christopher W. Pugh University of Oxford
Crispin Jenkinson
Crispin Jenkinson University of Oxford
Aiden R. Doherty
Aiden R. Doherty University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to diverse and rewarding roles in education, therapy, research, and counseling. With advances in technology and changing student needs, online degree programs have become a practical choice for many aspiring professionals.

For those interested in advanced psychological practice, there are a variety of online psych d programs that provide doctorate-level training and specialized clinical skills. If your aim is to help families and couples, accredited marriage and family therapy online programs accredited offer targeted education with options for flexible and accelerated study.

Cost and program speed are important considerations—many students seek the online masters in clinical psychology that are both reputable and affordable. Similarly, educators and aspiring academic leaders can benefit from edd programs designed with fast-track, online completion pathways.

Carefully researching each program’s accreditation, cost, time to completion, and specialization options is key to finding the right pathway for your goals in the Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Mary Boulton

Trending Scientists