World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
105
Citations
49072
World Ranking
6700
National Ranking
650

Jane M Blazeby publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane M Blazeby sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 713 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jane M Blazeby D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane M Blazeby sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 105 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Jane M Blazeby is affiliated with the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with significant contributions in several subfields including Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Economics and Econometrics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Sociology and Political Science.

The scientist's recent publications include works published from 2021 to 2024. Notable papers are:

  • A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance, 2021, BMJ
  • Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions: gap analysis, workshop and consultation-informed update, 2021, Health Technology Assessment
  • Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic or Open Lobectomy in Early-Stage Lung Cancer, 2022, NEJM Evidence
  • SPIRIT-PRO Extension explanation and elaboration: guidelines for inclusion of patient-reported outcomes in protocols of clinical trials, 2021, BMJ Open
  • A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance, 2024, International Journal of Nursing Studies

Jane M Blazeby has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Natalie Blencowe, Kerry Avery, Rhiannon Macefield, Sian Cousins, and Daisy Elliott.

The scientist has published extensively in established journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • British Journal of Surgery
  • BMJ Open
  • Trials
  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  • Health Technology Assessment

Their research covers various main topics such as:

  • Delphi Technique in Research
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Esophageal and GI Pathology

Jane M Blazeby holds the distinction of being a Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: Update of Medical Research Council guidance

    Kathryn Skivington;Lynsay Matthews;Sharon Anne Simpson;Peter Craig

  • The COMET Handbook: Version 1.0

    Paula R. Williamson;Douglas G. Altman;Heather Bagley;Karen L. Barnes

  • No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations.

    Peter McCulloch;Douglas G Altman;W Bruce Campbell;David R Flum

  • Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider.

    Paula R Williamson;Douglas G Altman;Jane M Blazeby;Mike Clarke

  • Patient-Reported Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

    Donovan Jl;Hamdy Fc;Lane Ja;Mason M

  • Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: the CONSORT PRO extension.

    Melanie Calvert;Jane Blazeby;Douglas G Altman;Dennis A Revicki

  • Guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trial Protocols: The SPIRIT-PRO Extension.

    Melanie Calvert;Derek Kyte;Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber;Anita Slade

  • The development of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL: A shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care

    Mogens Groenvold;Mogens Groenvold;Morten Aa. Petersen;Neil K. Aaronson;Juan I. Arraras

  • Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer

    William H Allum;Jane M Blazeby;S Michael Griffin;David Cunningham

  • Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation.

    P L Ergina;P L Ergina;J A Cook;J M Blazeby;I Boutron

  • Docetaxel versus active symptom control for refractory oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma (COUGAR-02) : an open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial

    Hugo E R Ford;Andrea Marshall;John A Bridgewater;Tobias Janowitz

  • Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations

    Jamie J Kirkham;Katherine Davis;Douglas G Altman;Jane M Blazeby

  • Aspirin in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial

    P W Horby;M Campbell;E Spata;Emberson

  • Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement.

    Jamie J. Kirkham;Sarah Gorst;Douglas G. Altman;Jane M. Blazeby

  • Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme.

    PM King;Jane M Blazeby;P Ewings;PJ Franks

  • Clinical and psychometric validation of an EORTC questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-OES18, to assess quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer.

    J.M Blazeby;T Conroy;E Hammerlid;P Fayers

  • Chemoradiotherapy with or without cetuximab in patients with oesophageal cancer (SCOPE1): a multicentre, phase 2/3 randomised trial

    Thomas David Lewis Crosby;Chris Nicholas Hurt;Stephen Falk;Simon Gollins

  • The European organization for research and treatment of cancer approach to developing questionnaire modules: an update and overview

    M.A.G. Sprangers;A. Cull;M. Groenvold;K. Bjordal

  • Clinical and psychometric validation of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 questionnaire module to assess health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer.

    RN Whistance;T Conroy;W Chie;A Costantini

  • A prospective longitudinal study examining the quality of life of patients with esophageal carcinoma.

    Jane M. Blazeby;John R. Farndon;Jenny Donovan;Derek Alderson

Frequent Co-Authors

Jenny L Donovan
Jenny L Donovan University of Bristol
Paula R Williamson
Paula R Williamson University of Liverpool
Mike Clarke
Mike Clarke Queen's University Belfast
Susan Michie
Susan Michie University College London
Ewan Ferlie
Ewan Ferlie King's College London
Peter Fayers
Peter Fayers University of Aberdeen
Barnaby C Reeves
Barnaby C Reeves University of Bristol
Douglas G. Altman
Douglas G. Altman University of Oxford
Freddie C. Hamdy
Freddie C. Hamdy University of Oxford
David Cunningham
David Cunningham Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Medicine students in the USA have a variety of flexible online degree programs to advance their careers in healthcare. For those interested in administration and leadership roles, an affordable healthcare administration degree online can be a great starting point, allowing graduates to work in hospitals, clinics, or public health organizations.

Professionals seeking advanced leadership and management positions may consider exploring cheap mha programs to earn a Master of Healthcare Administration. For those aiming at clinical leadership and nursing education, the cheapest dnp online programs provide an accessible path to a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree.

Aspiring pharmacists can also benefit from accelerated 3 year online pharmd programs, offering a quicker route to this in-demand profession. These online pathways are not only flexible but also cost-effective, opening doors to diverse, rewarding careers in the expanding healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Jane M Blazeby

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles