World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Seth P. Finklestein

Seth P. Finklestein

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
64
Citations
16354
World Ranking
3237
National Ranking
1501

Seth P. Finklestein publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Seth P. Finklestein sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 149 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Seth P. Finklestein D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Seth P. Finklestein sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Seth P. Finklestein is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and focuses their research primarily within the field of Medicine. Their scholarly work encompasses multiple subfields, including Rehabilitation, Neurology, Epidemiology, Molecular Biology, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

Their research topics cover a broad spectrum with notable emphasis on Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders, Acute Ischemic Stroke Management, Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders, Extracellular Vesicles in Disease, Bone and Joint Diseases, and Mesenchymal Stem Cell Research.

Key recent publications include:

  • "Extracellular vesicles derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells enhance myelin maintenance after cortical injury in aged rhesus monkeys" (2020) in Experimental Neurology
  • "Cognitive Demands Influence Upper Extremity Motor Performance During Recovery From Acute Stroke" (2021) in Neurology
  • "Association of Modified Rankin Scale With Recovery Phenotypes in Patients With Upper Extremity Weakness After Stroke" (2022) in Neurology
  • "Domain-Specific Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials of Therapies Promoting Stroke Recovery: A Suggested Blueprint" (2023) in Stroke
  • "Distinguishing Distinct Neural Systems for Proximal vs Distal Upper Extremity Motor Control After Acute Stroke" (2023) in Neurology

Seth P. Finklestein frequently collaborates with several scholars, including Steven C. Cramer, Lee H. Schwamm, David J. Lin, Kimberly S. Erler, and Leigh R. Hochberg.

Their publications are often found in venues such as Neurology, Stroke, UNC Libraries, Experimental Neurology, and Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, highlighting a concentration in neurological and rehabilitative medicine journals.

Best Publications

  • A Functional MRI Study of Subjects Recovered From Hemiparetic Stroke

    Steven C. Cramer;Gereon Nelles;Randall R. Benson;Jill D. Kaplan

  • Hyperacute stroke: evaluation with combined multisection diffusion-weighted and hemodynamically weighted echo-planar MR imaging.

    A G Sorensen;F S Buonanno;R G Gonzalez;L H Schwamm

  • Estradiol Protects Against Ischemic Injury

    Dena B. Dubal;Michael L. Kashon;L. Creed Pettigrew;Jing M. Ren

  • The predictive power of diagnostic tests and the effect of prevalence of illness

    Ross J. Baldessarini;Seth Finklestein;George W. Arana

  • Anatomical distribution of the growth-associated protein GAP-43/B-50 in the adult rat brain

    LI Benowitz;PJ Apostolides;N Perrone-Bizzozero;SP Finklestein

  • Increased basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) immunoreactivity at the site of focal brain wounds.

    Seth P. Finklestein;Paul J. Apostolides;Cornelio G. Caday;Cornelio G. Caday;James Prosser

  • Stroke: Working toward a prioritized world agenda

    Vladimir Hachinski;Geoffrey A. Donnan;Philip B. Gorelick;Werner Hacke

  • Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients: a preliminary study.

    Judith D. Schaechter;Eduard Kraft;Timothy S. Hilliard;Rick M. Dijkhuizen

  • The clinical spectrum of cerebral amyloid angiopathy: Presentations without lobar hemorrhage

    S. M. Greenberg;J.P.G. Vonsattel;J. W. Stakes;M. Gruber

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging of reorganization in rat brain after stroke.

    Rick M. Dijkhuizen;JingMei Ren;Joseph B. Mandeville;Ona Wu

  • Activation of Distinct Motor Cortex Regions During Ipsilateral and Contralateral Finger Movements

    Steven C. Cramer;Seth P. Finklestein;Judith D. Schaechter;George Bush;George Bush

  • Intracisternal basic fibroblast growth factor enhances functional recovery and up-regulates the expression of a molecular marker of neuronal sprouting following focal cerebral infarction

    Takakazu Kawamata;W. Dalton Dietrich;Timothy J Schallert;Jeffrey E. Gotts

  • Correlation between Brain Reorganization, Ischemic Damage, and Neurologic Status after Transient Focal Cerebral Ischemia in Rats: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

    Rick M. Dijkhuizen;Aneesh B. Singhal;Joseph B. Mandeville;Ona Wu

  • Petechial hemorrhages accompanying lobar hemorrhage: detection by gradient-echo MRI.

    Steven M. Greenberg;Seth P. Finklestein;Pamela W. Schaefer

  • Basic fibroblast growth factor protects against hypoxia-ischemia and NMDA neurotoxicity in neonatal rats.

    Kazuhiko Nozaki;Seth P. Finklestein;M. Flint Beal

  • The neuronal growth-associated protein GAP-43 (B-50, F1): neuronal specificity, developmental regulation and regional distribution of the human and rat mRNAs.

    Neve Rl;Perrone-Bizzozero Ni;Finklestein S;Zwiers H

  • Delayed Treatment with Intravenous Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor Reduces Infarct Size following Permanent Focal Cerebral Ischemia in Rats

    Marc Fisher;Mary-Ellen Meadows;Tuyen Do;Jens Weise

  • Intracisternal basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) enhances behavioral recovery following focal cerebral infarction in the rat

    Takakazu Kawamata;Nancy E. Alexis;W. Dalton Dietrich;Seth P. Finklestein

  • Pretreatment with intraventricular basic fibroblast growth factor decreases infarct size following focal cerebral ischemia in rats.

    Naoki Koketsu;David J. Berlove;Michael A. Moskowitz;Neil W. Kowall

  • Mood, vegetative disturbance, and dexamethasone suppression test after stroke

    Seth Finklestein;Seth Finklestein;Larry I. Benowitz;Ross J. Baldessarini;George W. Arana

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven C. Cramer
Steven C. Cramer University of California, Los Angeles
Ross J. Baldessarini
Ross J. Baldessarini Harvard University
Larry I. Benowitz
Larry I. Benowitz Harvard Medical School
Nora I. Perrone-Bizzozero
Nora I. Perrone-Bizzozero University of New Mexico
Bruce R. Rosen
Bruce R. Rosen Harvard University
Douglas L. Rosene
Douglas L. Rosene Boston University
Michael Klagsbrun
Michael Klagsbrun Boston Children's Hospital
Michael A. Moskowitz
Michael A. Moskowitz Harvard University
Lee H. Schwamm
Lee H. Schwamm Harvard University
Glenn D. Rosen
Glenn D. Rosen Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience in the USA can open doors to a broad range of online degrees and dynamic career pathways. Many students with an interest in neuroscience also consider pursuing fields such as psychology, counseling, or therapy—all of which offer opportunities to make a direct impact on mental health and well-being. These related pathways can be more affordable and flexible when pursued through accredited online programs.

For those drawn to counseling, there are cheapest cacrep-accredited programs online that meet national standards. Students seeking guidance on finding budget-friendly study options can also explore online counseling programs, which cover a wide range of specializations.

Another career path closely linked to neuroscience is family therapy. Those interested can find the cheapest online mft programs, designed for those wanting to work with couples and families. Additionally, advancing your education with a masters in psychology online can further enhance your career prospects in mental health, research, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Seth P. Finklestein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles