World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Seth P. Finklestein

Seth P. Finklestein

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 64 3237 2958 1501 1353 149 16354

Seth P. Finklestein publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Seth P. Finklestein between 1978 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Seth P. Finklestein published across 49 years, from 1978 to 2026, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 1997. 3 of the 157 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 1997. 1978: 2 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 2 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 6 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 3 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 13 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 4 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 3 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 2 publications 2026: 1 publication
1978 2026

157 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Seth P. Finklestein: publications per year, 1978 to 2026
Year Publications
1978 2
1979 1
1980 2
1981 0
1982 5
1983 2
1984 5
1985 1
1986 6
1987 4
1988 5
1989 3
1990 3
1991 1
1992 3
1993 5
1994 3
1995 4
1996 8
1997 13
1998 9
1999 7
2000 2
2001 7
2002 4
2003 3
2004 2
2005 3
2006 2
2007 2
2008 1
2009 4
2010 4
2011 1
2012 4
2013 2
2014 0
2015 2
2016 2
2017 1
2018 3
2019 5
2020 3
2021 2
2022 1
2023 2
2024 0
2025 2
2026 1
Total 157
Download as CSV

Seth P. Finklestein publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Seth P. Finklestein sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 148–157 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 149 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459 149
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Seth P. Finklestein D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Seth P. Finklestein sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278 64
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Seth P. Finklestein is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and focuses their research primarily within the field of Medicine. Their scholarly work encompasses multiple subfields, including Rehabilitation, Neurology, Epidemiology, Molecular Biology, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

Their research topics cover a broad spectrum with notable emphasis on Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders, Acute Ischemic Stroke Management, Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders, Extracellular Vesicles in Disease, Bone and Joint Diseases, and Mesenchymal Stem Cell Research.

Key recent publications include:

  • "Extracellular vesicles derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells enhance myelin maintenance after cortical injury in aged rhesus monkeys" (2020) in Experimental Neurology
  • "Cognitive Demands Influence Upper Extremity Motor Performance During Recovery From Acute Stroke" (2021) in Neurology
  • "Association of Modified Rankin Scale With Recovery Phenotypes in Patients With Upper Extremity Weakness After Stroke" (2022) in Neurology
  • "Domain-Specific Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials of Therapies Promoting Stroke Recovery: A Suggested Blueprint" (2023) in Stroke
  • "Distinguishing Distinct Neural Systems for Proximal vs Distal Upper Extremity Motor Control After Acute Stroke" (2023) in Neurology

Seth P. Finklestein frequently collaborates with several scholars, including Steven C. Cramer, Lee H. Schwamm, David J. Lin, Kimberly S. Erler, and Leigh R. Hochberg.

Their publications are often found in venues such as Neurology, Stroke, UNC Libraries, Experimental Neurology, and Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, highlighting a concentration in neurological and rehabilitative medicine journals.

Best Publications

  • A Functional MRI Study of Subjects Recovered From Hemiparetic Stroke

    Steven C. Cramer;Gereon Nelles;Randall R. Benson;Jill D. Kaplan

  • Hyperacute stroke: evaluation with combined multisection diffusion-weighted and hemodynamically weighted echo-planar MR imaging.

    A G Sorensen;F S Buonanno;R G Gonzalez;L H Schwamm

  • Estradiol Protects Against Ischemic Injury

    Dena B. Dubal;Michael L. Kashon;L. Creed Pettigrew;Jing M. Ren

  • The predictive power of diagnostic tests and the effect of prevalence of illness

    Ross J. Baldessarini;Seth Finklestein;George W. Arana

  • Anatomical distribution of the growth-associated protein GAP-43/B-50 in the adult rat brain

    LI Benowitz;PJ Apostolides;N Perrone-Bizzozero;SP Finklestein

  • Increased basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) immunoreactivity at the site of focal brain wounds.

    Seth P. Finklestein;Paul J. Apostolides;Cornelio G. Caday;Cornelio G. Caday;James Prosser

  • Stroke: Working toward a prioritized world agenda

    Vladimir Hachinski;Geoffrey A. Donnan;Philip B. Gorelick;Werner Hacke

  • Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients: a preliminary study.

    Judith D. Schaechter;Eduard Kraft;Timothy S. Hilliard;Rick M. Dijkhuizen

  • The clinical spectrum of cerebral amyloid angiopathy: Presentations without lobar hemorrhage

    S. M. Greenberg;J.P.G. Vonsattel;J. W. Stakes;M. Gruber

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging of reorganization in rat brain after stroke.

    Rick M. Dijkhuizen;JingMei Ren;Joseph B. Mandeville;Ona Wu

  • Activation of Distinct Motor Cortex Regions During Ipsilateral and Contralateral Finger Movements

    Steven C. Cramer;Seth P. Finklestein;Judith D. Schaechter;George Bush;George Bush

  • Intracisternal basic fibroblast growth factor enhances functional recovery and up-regulates the expression of a molecular marker of neuronal sprouting following focal cerebral infarction

    Takakazu Kawamata;W. Dalton Dietrich;Timothy J Schallert;Jeffrey E. Gotts

  • Correlation between Brain Reorganization, Ischemic Damage, and Neurologic Status after Transient Focal Cerebral Ischemia in Rats: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

    Rick M. Dijkhuizen;Aneesh B. Singhal;Joseph B. Mandeville;Ona Wu

  • Petechial hemorrhages accompanying lobar hemorrhage: detection by gradient-echo MRI.

    Steven M. Greenberg;Seth P. Finklestein;Pamela W. Schaefer

  • Basic fibroblast growth factor protects against hypoxia-ischemia and NMDA neurotoxicity in neonatal rats.

    Kazuhiko Nozaki;Seth P. Finklestein;M. Flint Beal

  • The neuronal growth-associated protein GAP-43 (B-50, F1): neuronal specificity, developmental regulation and regional distribution of the human and rat mRNAs.

    Neve Rl;Perrone-Bizzozero Ni;Finklestein S;Zwiers H

  • Delayed Treatment with Intravenous Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor Reduces Infarct Size following Permanent Focal Cerebral Ischemia in Rats

    Marc Fisher;Mary-Ellen Meadows;Tuyen Do;Jens Weise

  • Intracisternal basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) enhances behavioral recovery following focal cerebral infarction in the rat

    Takakazu Kawamata;Nancy E. Alexis;W. Dalton Dietrich;Seth P. Finklestein

  • Pretreatment with intraventricular basic fibroblast growth factor decreases infarct size following focal cerebral ischemia in rats.

    Naoki Koketsu;David J. Berlove;Michael A. Moskowitz;Neil W. Kowall

  • Mood, vegetative disturbance, and dexamethasone suppression test after stroke

    Seth Finklestein;Seth Finklestein;Larry I. Benowitz;Ross J. Baldessarini;George W. Arana

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven C. Cramer
Steven C. Cramer University of California, Los Angeles
Ross J. Baldessarini
Ross J. Baldessarini Harvard University
Larry I. Benowitz
Larry I. Benowitz Harvard Medical School
Nora I. Perrone-Bizzozero
Nora I. Perrone-Bizzozero University of New Mexico
Bruce R. Rosen
Bruce R. Rosen Harvard University
Douglas L. Rosene
Douglas L. Rosene Boston University
Michael Klagsbrun
Michael Klagsbrun Boston Children's Hospital
Michael A. Moskowitz
Michael A. Moskowitz Harvard University
Lee H. Schwamm
Lee H. Schwamm Harvard University
Glenn D. Rosen
Glenn D. Rosen Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience in the USA can open doors to a broad range of online degrees and dynamic career pathways. Many students with an interest in neuroscience also consider pursuing fields such as psychology, counseling, or therapy—all of which offer opportunities to make a direct impact on mental health and well-being. These related pathways can be more affordable and flexible when pursued through accredited online programs.

For those drawn to counseling, there are cheapest cacrep-accredited programs online that meet national standards. Students seeking guidance on finding budget-friendly study options can also explore online counseling programs, which cover a wide range of specializations.

Another career path closely linked to neuroscience is family therapy. Those interested can find the cheapest online mft programs, designed for those wanting to work with couples and families. Additionally, advancing your education with a masters in psychology online can further enhance your career prospects in mental health, research, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Seth P. Finklestein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles