World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robert M. Weisskoff

Robert M. Weisskoff

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
84
Citations
46926
World Ranking
14821
National Ranking
7491

Neuroscience

D-Index
84
Citations
47124
World Ranking
1361
National Ranking
684

Robert M. Weisskoff publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Weisskoff sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 150 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Robert M. Weisskoff D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Weisskoff sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert M. Weisskoff is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. The focus of their academic and research career centers around their role at this institution.

There are no recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, specific fields or subfields of study, or main topics of work publicly listed in the available source data. Likewise, there are no records of awards attributed to them.

The details provided do not include notable publication records or areas of research specialization, and there is no specified information about collaborations or research partnerships.

Given the available data, Robert M. Weisskoff's professional profile is characterized by their association with Harvard University, without further granular details on research outputs or academic contributions.

Best Publications

  • Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation.

    Kenneth K. Kwong;John W. Belliveau;David A. Chesler;Inna E. Goldberg

  • Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols.

    Paul S. Tofts;Gunnar Brix;David L. Buckley;Jeffrey L. Evelhoch

  • Functional mapping of the human visual cortex by magnetic resonance imaging

    J. W. Belliveau;D. N. Kennedy;R. C. McKinstry;B. R. Buchbinder

  • Reduction of eddy-current-induced distortion in diffusion MRI using a twice-refocused spin echo.

    Timothy G. Reese;O. Heid;R. M. Weisskoff;V. J. Wedeen

  • High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I: Mathematical approach and statistical analysis

    Leif Østergaard;Robert M. Weisskoff;David A. Chesler;Carsten Gyldensted

  • Acute effects of cocaine on human brain activity and emotion

    Hans C Breiter;Randy L Gollub;Robert M Weisskoff;David N Kennedy

  • Mapping complex tissue architecture with diffusion spectrum magnetic resonance imaging.

    Van J. Wedeen;Patric Hagmann;Patric Hagmann;Wen-Yih Isaac Tseng;Timothy G. Reese

  • Calibrated functional MRI: Mapping the dynamics of oxidative metabolism

    Timothy L. Davis;Kenneth K. Kwong;Robert M. Weisskoff;Bruce R. Rosen

  • Mr contrast due to intravascular magnetic susceptibility perturbations

    Jerrold L. Boxerman;Leena M. Hamberg;Bruce R. Rosen;Robert M. Weisskoff

  • Cerebral blood volume maps of gliomas : comparison with tumor grade and histologic findings

    H J Aronen;I E Gazit;D N Louis;B R Buchbinder

  • High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part II: Experimental comparison and preliminary results

    Leif Østergaard;Alma Gregory Sorensen;Kenneth K. Kwong;Robert M. Weisskoff

  • Hyperacute stroke: evaluation with combined multisection diffusion-weighted and hemodynamically weighted echo-planar MR imaging.

    A G Sorensen;F S Buonanno;R G Gonzalez;L H Schwamm

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging of symptom provocation in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Hans C. Breiter;Scott L. Rauch;Kenneth K. Kwong;John R. Baker

  • Microscopic susceptibility variation and transverse relaxation: theory and experiment.

    Robert Weisskoff;Chun S. Zuo;Jerrold L. Boxerman;Jerrold L. Boxerman;Bruce R. Rosen

  • Dynamic functional imaging of relative cerebral blood volume during rat forepaw stimulation

    Joseph B. Mandeville;John J. A. Marota;Barry E. Kosofsky;John R. Keltner

  • Relative Cerebral Blood Volume Maps Corrected for Contrast Agent Extravasation Significantly Correlate with Glioma Tumor Grade, Whereas Uncorrected Maps Do Not

    J.L. Boxerman;K.M. Schmainda;R.M. Weisskoff

  • The intravascular contribution to fMRI signal change: Monte Carlo modeling and diffusion-weighted studies in vivo.

    Jerrold L. Boxerman;Peter A. Bandettini;Kenneth K. Kwong;John R. Baker

  • Tracer arrival timing-insensitive technique for estimating flow in MR perfusion-weighted imaging using singular value decomposition with a block-circulant deconvolution matrix.

    Ona Wu;Leif Østergaard;Robert M. Weisskoff;Thomas Benner

  • Mr perfusion studies with t1‐weighted echo planar imaging

    Kenneth K. Kwong;David A. Chesler;Robert M. Weisskoff;Kathleen M. Donahue

  • Evidence of a cerebrovascular postarteriole windkessel with delayed compliance.

    Joseph B. Mandeville;John J. A. Marota;C. Ayata;Greg Zaharchuk

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce R. Rosen
Bruce R. Rosen Harvard University
Kenneth K. Kwong
Kenneth K. Kwong Harvard University
Thomas J. Brady
Thomas J. Brady Harvard University
Van J. Wedeen
Van J. Wedeen Harvard University
Leif Østergaard
Leif Østergaard Aarhus University
John W. Belliveau
John W. Belliveau Harvard University
Joseph B. Mandeville
Joseph B. Mandeville Harvard University
David N. Kennedy
David N. Kennedy University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
A. Gregory Sorensen
A. Gregory Sorensen Harvard University
Michael A. Moskowitz
Michael A. Moskowitz Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA can open doors to a spectrum of impactful careers. Those interested in expanding their qualifications often consider online certificates that provide valuable skills and can lead to well-paying jobs in research, healthcare, or allied fields.

If flexibility is a priority, students may benefit from online college courses that are accessible and user-friendly, allowing for easy integration with work or personal commitments. These programs can serve as a stepping stone toward more advanced degrees or specialized professions.

For those drawn to the intersection of neuroscience and social work, there are online msw programs affordable enough to fit a variety of budgets while still providing the essential training required for a career in mental health or social services.

Additionally, careers in behavioral analysis are within reach for students who seek online bcba programs focused on affordability and practical training. These options broaden potential opportunities, making neuroscience a versatile and future-focused field of study.

Best Scientists Citing Robert M. Weisskoff

Recently Published Articles