World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michelle R. Hebl

Michelle R. Hebl

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
57
Citations
15137
World Ranking
3988
National Ranking
2238

Michelle R. Hebl publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michelle R. Hebl sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 147 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michelle R. Hebl D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michelle R. Hebl sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michelle R. Hebl is affiliated with Rice University in the United States. Their research spans a broad area within the social sciences, with a focus on several interdisciplinary fields and topics that intersect psychology, sociology, and gender studies.

The primary fields of study for this scientist include:

  • Social Sciences

Their work further breaks down into the following subfields:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Gender Studies
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Safety Research
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

The main research topics explored by Michelle R. Hebl cover:

  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Sleep and related disorders
  • Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Emotional Labor in Professions
  • Gender Studies in Language

Notable recent publications by Michelle R. Hebl include:

  • "Beyond the business case: Universally designing the workplace for neurodiversity and inclusion" (2023), published in Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • "Expanding Research on Working Women More Globally: Identifying and Remediating Current Blindspots" (2020), published in Journal of Social Issues
  • "Experimental sleep loss, racial bias, and the decision criterion to shoot in the Police Officer's Dilemma task" (2020), published in Scientific Reports
  • "When Words Matter: Communal and Agentic Language on Men and Women's Resumes" (2020), published in Academy of Management Proceedings
  • "Giving to Matthew, Emily, Jose, or Maria: A Field Study Examining the Impact of Race and Gender on Donation Requests" (2023), published in Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly

Their research has been published most frequently in the following venues:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Journal of Social Issues
  • Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly

Michelle R. Hebl has collaborated regularly with a number of co-authors, including:

  • Christine Nittrouer
  • Eden B. King
  • Dillon Stewart
  • Elisabeth R. Silver
  • Michael K. Scullin

Best Publications

  • THE VIEW FROM THE ROAD: IMPLICATIONS FOR STRESS RECOVERY AND IMMUNIZATION

    Russ Parsons;Louis G. Tassinary;Roger S. Ulrich;Michelle R. Hebl

  • The disclosure dilemma for gay men and lesbians: "Coming out" at work.

    Kristin H. Griffith;Michelle R. Hebl

  • RACIAL DIFFERENCES IN EMPLOYEE RETENTION: ARE DIVERSITY CLIMATE PERCEPTIONS THE KEY?

    Patrick F. McKAY;Derek R. Avery;Scott Tonidandel;Mark A. Morris

  • Formal and Interpersonal Discrimination: A Field Study of Bias Toward Homosexual Applicants

    Michelle R. Hebl;Jessica Bigazzi Foster;Laura M. Mannix;John F. Dovidio

  • Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: agentic and communal differences

    Juan M. Madera;Michelle R. Hebl;Randi C. Martin

  • Weighing the care : physicians' reactions to the size of a patient

    M R Hebl;J Xu

  • The Weight of Obesity in Evaluating Others: A Mere Proximity Effect:

    Michelle R. Hebl;Laura M. Mannix

  • The Stigma of Obesity in Women: The Difference is Black and White

    Michelle R. Hebl;Todd F. Heatherton

  • The Swimsuit Becomes Us All: Ethnicity, Gender, and Vulnerability to Self-Objectification

    Michelle R. Hebl;Eden B. King;Jean Lin

  • Conformity to sex-typed norms, affect, and the self-concept.

    Wendy Wood;P. Niels Christensen;Michelle R. Hebl;Hank Rothgerber

  • Hostile and benevolent reactions toward pregnant women: complementary interpersonal punishments and rewards that maintain traditional roles.

    Michelle R. Hebl;Eden B. King;Peter Glick;Sarah L. Singletary

  • The stigma of obesity in customer service: a mechanism for remediation and bottom-line consequences of interpersonal discrimination.

    Eden B. King;Jenessa R. Shapiro;Michelle R. Hebl;Sarah L. Singletary

  • Understanding Tokenism: Antecedents and Consequences of a Psychological Climate of Gender Inequity

    Eden B. King;Michelle R. Hebl;Jennifer M. George;Sharon F. Matusik

  • Benevolent Sexism at Work Gender Differences in the Distribution of Challenging Developmental Experiences

    Eden B. King;Whitney Botsford;Michelle R. Hebl;Stephanie Kazama

  • Promoting the “Social” in the Examination of Social Stigmas

    Michelle R. Hebl;John F. Dovidio

  • Linking Personality to Helping Behaviors at Work: An Interactional Perspective

    Eden B. King;Jennifer M. George;Michelle R. Hebl

  • Awkward moments in interactions between nonstigmatized and stigmatized individuals.

    Michelle R. Hebl;Jennifer Tickle;Todd F. Heatherton

  • The role of social norm clarity in the influenced expression of prejudice over time

    Emily M. Zitek;Michelle R. Hebl

  • Gender disparities in colloquium speakers at top universities

    Christine L. Nittrouer;Michelle R. Hebl;Leslie Ashburn-Nardo;Rachel C. E. Trump-Steele

  • Trans-Parency in the Workplace: How the Experiences of Transsexual Employees Can Be Improved.

    Charlie L. Law;Larry R. Martinez;Enrica N. Ruggs;Michelle R. Hebl

Frequent Co-Authors

Eden B. King
Eden B. King Rice University
Juan M. Madera
Juan M. Madera University of Houston
John F. Dovidio
John F. Dovidio Yale University
Derek R. Avery
Derek R. Avery University of Houston
Jennifer A. Richeson
Jennifer A. Richeson Yale University
J. Nicole Shelton
J. Nicole Shelton Princeton University
David M. Lane
David M. Lane Rice University
Jeremy Dawson
Jeremy Dawson University of Sheffield
Michael K. Scullin
Michael K. Scullin Baylor University
Randi C. Martin
Randi C. Martin Rice University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens up diverse online degree options and professional pathways. Many students choose to specialize as a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), which is a popular and rewarding field within psychology.

Education requirements for MFTs can vary depending on location. If you are interested in how to become an mft in Newark, you’ll find that particular licensing standards and degree prerequisites apply. Similarly, those researching Norfolk mft education requirements or wanting to understand how to become an mft in North Las Vegas will discover that each state has specific criteria regarding supervised hours, coursework, and licensure exams.

For students on the West Coast, Oakland mft education requirements also provide insight into the necessary academic and professional steps. Many accredited universities in the USA now offer online psychology and MFT programs, making it more accessible than ever to pursue these career paths from anywhere. Carefully review requirements in your desired location to ensure your educational pathway aligns with your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Michelle R. Hebl

Trending Scientists