World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6237 5798 3376 3060 143 7606

Diana T. Sanchez publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Diana T. Sanchez between 2000 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Diana T. Sanchez published across 27 years, from 2000 to 2026, averaging 6 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2013. 3 of the 162 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2013. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 2 publications 2026: 1 publication
2000 2026

162 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Diana T. Sanchez: publications per year, 2000 to 2026
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 1
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 3
2006 2
2007 5
2008 2
2009 7
2010 9
2011 3
2012 7
2013 14
2014 6
2015 9
2016 12
2017 6
2018 14
2019 14
2020 5
2021 12
2022 9
2023 11
2024 7
2025 2
2026 1
Total 162
Download as CSV

Diana T. Sanchez publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana T. Sanchez sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 143 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 143
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Diana T. Sanchez D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana T. Sanchez sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 47
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Diana T. Sanchez is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research spans key areas within social sciences and psychology, with an emphasis on sociology, political science, gender studies, social psychology, clinical psychology, and mental health. They have contributed extensively to understanding social and intergroup psychology as well as topics related to racial and ethnic identity, sexual function and dysfunction, gender roles and identity, and LGBTQ health and policy.

The scientist's recent publications cover a range of topics in social and gender studies. Notable papers include:

  • Open science, communal culture, and women's participation in the movement to improve science (2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Dual cues: Women of color anticipate both gender and racial bias in the face of a single identity cue (2020, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations)
  • Orgasm Frequency Predicts Desire and Expectation for Orgasm: Assessing the Orgasm Gap within Mixed-Sex Couples (2022, Sex Roles)
  • Heterosexual Young Adults' Experience With and Perceptions of the Orgasm Gap: A Mixed Methods Approach (2022, Psychology of Women Quarterly)
  • Identity Safety Cues Predict Instructor Impressions, Belonging, and Absences in the Psychology Classroom (2021, Teaching of Psychology)

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • Sex Roles
  • Teaching of Psychology
  • Stigma and Health

Sanchez collaborates regularly with several coauthors, reflecting a networked approach to research. Frequent collaborators are:

  • Rebecca Cipollina
  • Kimberly E. Chaney
  • Grace M. Wetzel
  • Analia F. Albuja
  • Melanie R. Maimon

Their body of work addresses diverse themes: social dynamics within group settings, intersections of gender and racial identity, and sexual health topics. With 59 publications placed broadly under social sciences and 31 specifically within psychology, their research integrates interdisciplinary perspectives.

Subfields of particular focus include sociology and political science, gender studies, social psychology, clinical psychology, and psychiatry and mental health. This range supports inquiry into complex social identities and behavioral health outcomes.

Topics frequently studied by Sanchez feature:

  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy

Best Publications

  • Perspectives and research on the positive and negative implications of having multiple racial identities.

    Margaret Shih;Diana T. Sanchez

  • Body concerns in and out of the bedroom: implications for sexual pleasure and problems.

    Diana T. Sanchez;Amy K. Kiefer

  • The social construction of race: biracial identity and vulnerability to stereotypes.

    Margaret Shih;Courtney Bonam;Diana Sanchez;Courtney Peck

  • Doing Gender in the Bedroom: Investing in Gender Norms and the Sexual Experience:

    Diana T. Sanchez;Jennifer Crocker;Karlee R. Boike

  • Eroticizing inequality in the United States: The consequences and determinants of traditional gender role adherence in intimate relationships

    Diana T. Sanchez;Janell C. Fetterolf;Laurie A. Rudman

  • When Race Becomes Even More Complex: Toward Understanding the Landscape of Multiracial Identity and Experiences

    Margaret Shih;Diana T. Sanchez

  • HOW INVESTMENT IN GENDER IDEALS AFFECTS WELL-BEING: THE ROLE OF EXTERNAL CONTINGENCIES OF SELF-WORTH

    Diana T. Sanchez;Jennifer Crocker

  • Sexual Submissiveness in Women: Costs for Sexual Autonomy and Arousal

    Diana T. Sanchez;Amy K. Kiefer;Oscar Ybarra

  • Juggling multiple racial identities: Malleable racial identification and psychological well-being.

    Diana T. Sanchez;Margaret Shih;Julie A. Garcia

  • To Disclose or Not to Disclose Biracial Identity: The Effect of Biracial Disclosure on Perceiver Evaluations and Target Responses

    Diana T. Sanchez;Courtney M. Bonam

  • Scripting sexual passivity: A gender role perspective

    Unknown

  • Vigilance in the discrimination-stress model for black americans

    Mary S. Himmelstein;Danielle M. Young;Diana T. Sanchez;James S. Jackson

  • When Do We Confront? Perceptions of Costs and Benefits Predict Confronting Discrimination on Behalf of the Self and Others

    Jessica J. Good;Corinne A. Moss-Racusin;Diana T. Sanchez

  • What Motivates the Sexual Double Standard? More Support for Male Versus Female Control Theory

    Laurie A. Rudman;Janell C. Fetterolf;Diana T. Sanchez

  • Masculinity impediments: Internalized masculinity contributes to healthcare avoidance in men and women:

    Mary S Himmelstein;Diana T Sanchez

  • Doing gender for different reasons: why gender conformity positively and negatively predicts self-esteem.

    Jessica J. Good;Diana T. Sanchez

  • How Do Forced-Choice Dilemmas Affect Multiracial People? The Role of Identity Autonomy and Public Regard in Depressive Symptoms

    Diana T. Sanchez

  • A Perceptual Pathway to Bias: Interracial Exposure Reduces Abrupt Shifts in Real-Time Race Perception That Predict Mixed-Race Bias

    Jonathan B. Freeman;Kristin Pauker;Diana T. Sanchez

  • When the Relationship becomes Her: Revisiting Women's Body Concerns from a Relationship Contingency Perspective.

    Diana T. Sanchez;Tracy Kwang

  • Men Seek Social Standing, Women Seek Companionship Sex Differences in Deriving Self-Worth From Relationships

    Tracy Kwang;Erin E. Crockett;Diana T. Sanchez;William B. Swann

  • Heterosexual Men’s Confrontation of Sexual Prejudice: The Role of Precarious Manhood

    Kathryn M. Kroeper;Diana T. Sanchez;Mary S. Himmelstein

  • Organizational Identity Safety Cue Transfers.

    Kimberly E. Chaney;Diana T. Sanchez;Jessica D. Remedios

Frequent Co-Authors

Margaret Shih
Margaret Shih University of California, Los Angeles
Corinne A. Moss-Racusin
Corinne A. Moss-Racusin Skidmore College
Laurie A. Rudman
Laurie A. Rudman Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Shawna J. Lee
Shawna J. Lee University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jennifer Crocker
Jennifer Crocker The Ohio State University
William B. Swann
William B. Swann The University of Texas at Austin
Oscar Ybarra
Oscar Ybarra University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Franco Pestilli
Franco Pestilli The University of Texas at Austin
James S. Jackson
James S. Jackson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jessi L. Smith
Jessi L. Smith University of Colorado Colorado Springs

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Psychology, exploring related online degrees opens up diverse career pathways. Social work is one of the most closely allied fields, offering opportunities to impact communities and individuals directly. With the rising popularity of flexible, high-quality online programs, it's now more accessible than ever to gain the credentials needed to advance in this area.

If you are searching for top programs, consider the most valuable online social work degree programs in America. These programs are recognized for their comprehensive curriculum and graduate success rates. Students in specific regions can benefit from local options as well, such as the best value online social work programs in Connecticut and the most valuable online social work degrees in Dubuque.

Those in the Midwest may want to explore the most valuable online social work degrees in Indiana for regionally focused, high-return programs. Completing a degree online provides the flexibility to balance your studies with work or personal commitments, while preparing you for diverse roles within mental health, counseling, or public service.

Best Scientists Citing Diana T. Sanchez

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles