World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
7094
World Ranking
8219
National Ranking
4405

Jessi L. Smith publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jessi L. Smith sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 102 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jessi L. Smith D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jessi L. Smith sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jessi L. Smith is affiliated with the University of Colorado Colorado Springs in the United States and works primarily within the Social Sciences domain. Their research spans multiple subfields, including Safety Research, Social Psychology, Education, Gender Studies, and General Health Professions.

Their scholarly contributions focus on topics such as Career Development and Diversity, Mentoring and Academic Development, Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions, Gender Diversity and Inequality, Science Education and Pedagogy, Innovative Teaching Methods, and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies.

Jessi L. Smith has coauthored frequently with several researchers, including Dustin B. Thoman, Judith M. Harackiewicz, Michael W. Asher, Nicole M. Else-Quest, and Janet Shibley Hyde.

Their work appears in a variety of publication venues. They have multiple publications in CBE-Life Sciences Education, Frontiers in Psychology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Psychology of Women Quarterly, and Innovative Higher Education.

Recent papers by Jessi L. Smith include:

  • "Open science, communal culture, and women's participation in the movement to improve science" (2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • "Utility-value intervention promotes persistence and diversity in STEM" (2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • "Assimilation Undercuts Authenticity: A Consequence of Women's Masculine Self-Presentation in Masculine Contexts" (2020, Psychology of Women Quarterly)
  • "Diversity fatigue: A survey for measuring attitudes towards diversity enhancing efforts in academia" (2021, Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology)
  • "Diversity Interventions in the Classroom: From Resistance to Action" (2021, CBE-Life Sciences Education)

Best Publications

  • Interest Matters: The Importance of Promoting Interest in Education

    Judith M. Harackiewicz;Jessi L. Smith;Stacy J. Priniski

  • When Trying Hard Isn’t Natural Women’s Belonging With and Motivation for Male-Dominated STEM Fields As a Function of Effort Expenditure Concerns

    Jessi L. Smith;Karyn L. Lewis;Lauren Hawthorne;Sara D. Hodges

  • Understanding the Process of Stereotype Threat: A Review of Mediational Variables and New Performance Goal Directions.

    Jessi L. Smith

  • From Bench to Bedside: A Communal Utility Value Intervention to Enhance Students' Biomedical Science Motivation.

    Elizabeth R. Brown;Jessi L. Smith;Dustin B. Thoman;Jill M. Allen

  • Quality of evidence revealing subtle gender biases in science is in the eye of the beholder.

    Ian M. Handley;Elizabeth R. Brown;Corinne A. Moss-Racusin;Jessi L. Smith

  • The stereotyped task engagement process: The role of interest and achievement motivation.

    Jessi L. Smith;Carol Sansone;Paul H. White

  • Interest and self-regulation: The relation between having to and wanting to

    Carol Sansone;Jessi L. Smith

  • Giving back or giving up: Native American student experiences in science and engineering

    Jessi L. Smith;Erin Cech;Anneke Metz;Meghan Huntoon

  • An examination of implicitly activated, explicitly activated, and nullified stereotypes on mathematical performance: It's not just a woman's issue.

    Jessi L. Smith;Jessi L. Smith;Paul H. White

  • The Role of Altruistic Values in Motivating Underrepresented Minority Students for Biomedicine

    Dustin B. Thoman;Elizabeth R. Brown;Andrew Z. Mason;Allen G. Harmsen

  • Feeling the Threat: Stereotype Threat as a Contextual Barrier to Women's Science Career Choice Intentions.

    Eric D. Deemer;Dustin B. Thoman;Justin P. Chase;Justin P. Chase;Jessi L. Smith

  • Beyond Performance: A Motivational Experiences Model of Stereotype Threat.

    Dustin B. Thoman;Jessi L. Smith;Elizabeth R. Brown;Justin Chase

  • Development of the Domain Identification Measure: A Tool for Investigating Stereotype Threat Effects:

    Jessi L. Smith;Paul H. White

  • Other People as a Source of Interest in an Activity

    James D. Isaac;Carol Sansone;Jessi L. Smith

  • Project SOAR: a training program to increase school counselors' knowledge and confidence regarding suicide prevention and intervention.

    Keith A. King;Jessi L. Smith

  • The Resource Replenishment Function of Interest

    Dustin B. Thoman;Jessi L. Smith;Paul J. Silvia

  • Now Hiring! Empirically Testing a Three-Step Intervention to Increase Faculty Gender Diversity in STEM

    Jessi L. Smith;Ian M. Handley;Alexander V. Zale;Sara Rushing

  • To Grab and To Hold: Cultivating communal goals to overcome cultural and structural barriers in first generation college students' science interest.

    Jill M. Allen;Gregg A. Muragishi;Jessi L. Smith;Dustin B. Thoman

  • Closing the communal gap: The importance of communal affordances in science career motivation

    Elizabeth R. Brown;Dustin B. Thoman;Jessi L. Smith;Amanda B. Diekman

  • No Place for a Woman: Evidence for Gender Bias in Evaluations of Presidential Candidates

    Jessi L. Smith;David Paul;Rachel Paul

Frequent Co-Authors

Carol Sansone
Carol Sansone University of Utah
Erin A. Cech
Erin A. Cech University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Sara D. Hodges
Sara D. Hodges University of Oregon
Judith A. Hall
Judith A. Hall Northeastern University
William Ickes
William Ickes The University of Texas at Arlington
Elizabeth A. Shanahan
Elizabeth A. Shanahan Montana State University
Amanda B. Diekman
Amanda B. Diekman Indiana University
Judith M. Harackiewicz
Judith M. Harackiewicz University of Wisconsin–Madison
Franco Pestilli
Franco Pestilli The University of Texas at Austin
Corinne A. Moss-Racusin
Corinne A. Moss-Racusin Skidmore College

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Psychology is a diverse field, offering numerous career pathways for graduates. One prominent option is becoming an organizational psychologist. Understanding what is the role of an organizational psychologist can help students see how psychology contributes to workplace productivity, employee well-being, and leadership development.

Another rewarding avenue is behavioral analysis, which can open doors in clinics, schools, and community programs. If you are interested in compensation and work opportunities, exploring the behavior analyst salary and career progression may be useful.

For those drawn to the intersection of psychology and the law, forensic psychology is an exciting specialization. Learning more about forensic psychologist education requirements is essential for anyone considering this dynamic pathway.

Many universities now offer flexible learning through online psychology programs. But are online psychology degrees legitimate? Understanding program accreditation and employer perception can assure students of the value of earning a psychology degree online.

Best Scientists Citing Jessi L. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles