World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
4023
World Ranking
9973
National Ranking
5254

Karen S. Ingersoll publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen S. Ingersoll sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 94 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Karen S. Ingersoll D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen S. Ingersoll sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Karen S. Ingersoll is affiliated with the University of Virginia in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on intersecting fields within medicine, health professions, and psychology.

The main domains of study for this scientist include:

  • Medicine
  • Health Professions
  • Psychology

Ingersoll's work spans multiple subfields such as:

  • General Health Professions
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Applied Psychology
  • Epidemiology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Their research covers a range of topics with particular attention to:

  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Sleep and related disorders
  • ICT in Developing Communities
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Ingersoll has contributed to publications in several frequent venues, including:

  • AIDS and Behavior
  • JMIR Formative Research
  • Patient Education and Counseling
  • SLEEP
  • JMIR Human Factors

Frequent collaborators with multiple joint publications include:

  • Rebecca Dillingham
  • Tabor Flickinger
  • Lee M. Ritterband
  • Ava Lena Waldman
  • Jessica G. Smith

Significant recent papers authored or co-authored by Karen S. Ingersoll include:

  • "Liar! Liar! Identifying eligibility fraud by applicants in digital health research" (2021), Internet Interventions
  • "Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Motivational Interviewing with Sexual Minority Male Couples to Reduce Drug Use and Sexual Risk: The Couples Health Project" (2021), AIDS and Behavior
  • "Long term impact of PositiveLinks: Clinic-deployed mobile technology to improve engagement with HIV care" (2020), PLoS ONE
  • "Motivational interviewing with male couples to reduce substance use and HIV risk: Manifestations of partner discord and strategies for facilitating dyadic functioning." (2020), Psychotherapy
  • "A Mobile Health App to Support Patients Receiving Medication-Assisted Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder: Development and Feasibility Study" (2021), JMIR Formative Research

Karen S. Ingersoll was named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2015.

Best Publications

  • Preventing alcohol-exposed pregnancies: a randomized controlled trial.

    R. Louise Floyd;Mark Sobell;Mary M. Velasquez;Karen Ingersoll

  • Effect of a Web-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Insomnia Intervention With 1-Year Follow-up: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Lee M. Ritterband;Frances P. Thorndike;Karen S. Ingersoll;Holly R. Lord

  • Motivational Interviewing in Groups

    Mary M. Velasquez;Nanette S. Stephens;Karen Ingersoll

  • Intimate Partner Violence: A Predictor of Worse HIV Outcomes and Engagement in Care

    Katherine R. Schafer;Julia Brant;Shruti Gupta;John Thorpe

  • The impact of psychiatric symptoms, drug use, and medication regimen on non-adherence to HIV treatment

    K Ingersoll

  • PositiveLinks: A Mobile Health Intervention for Retention in HIV Care and Clinical Outcomes with 12-Month Follow-Up

    Rebecca Dillingham;Karen Ingersoll;Tabor E. Flickinger;Ava Lena Waldman

  • Reducing alcohol-exposed pregnancy risk in college women: Initial outcomes of a clinical trial of a motivational intervention

    Karen S. Ingersoll;Sherry Dyche Ceperich;Mary D. Nettleman;Mary D. Nettleman;Kimberly Karanda

  • Insomnia in epilepsy is associated with continuing seizures and worse quality of life

    Mark Quigg;Sean Gharai;Jeff Ruland;Catherine Schroeder

  • A randomized controlled trial of an internet intervention for adults with insomnia: effects on comorbid psychological and fatigue symptoms.

    Frances P. Thorndike;Lee M. Ritterband;Linda A. Gonder-Frederick;Holly R. Lord

  • A preliminary investigation of the predictors of tanning dependence.

    Carolyn J Heckman;Brian L. Egleston;Diane B Wilson;Karen S Ingersoll

  • A pilot randomized clinical trial of two medication adherence and drug use interventions for HIV+ crack cocaine users

    Karen S. Ingersoll;Leah Farrell-Carnahan;Jessye Cohen-Filipic;Carolyn J. Heckman

  • Patient-clinician relationships and treatment system effects on HIV medication adherence.

    Karen S. Ingersoll;Carolyn J. Heckman

  • Motivational interviewing targeting diet and physical activity improves adherence to paediatric obesity treatment: results from the MI Values randomized controlled trial.

    Melanie K. Bean;Priscilla Powell;Alexis Quinoy;Karen Ingersoll

  • Liar! Liar! Identifying eligibility fraud by applicants in digital health research.

    Jillian V. Glazer;Kirsten MacDonnell;Christina Frederick;Karen Ingersoll

  • Motivational interviewing + feedback intervention to reduce alcohol-exposed pregnancy risk among college binge drinkers: determinants and patterns of response

    Sherry Dyche Ceperich;Sherry Dyche Ceperich;Karen S. Ingersoll;Karen S. Ingersoll

  • Social Support in a Virtual Community: Analysis of a Clinic-Affiliated Online Support Group for Persons Living with HIV/AIDS

    Tabor E. Flickinger;Claire DeBolt;Ava Lena Waldman;George Reynolds

  • Preconceptional motivational interviewing interventions to reduce alcohol-exposed pregnancy risk.

    Karen S. Ingersoll;Sherry D. Ceperich;Jennifer E. Hettema;Leah Farrell-Carnahan

  • A Dual-Focus Motivational Intervention to Reduce the Risk of Alcohol-Exposed Pregnancy

    Mary M. Velasquez;Karen S. Ingersoll;Mark B. Sobell;R. Louise Floyd

  • Development of a personalized bidirectional text messaging tool for HIV adherence assessment and intervention among substance abusers

    Karen Ingersoll;Rebecca Dillingham;George Reynolds;Jennifer Hettema

  • MAPIT: Development of a web-based intervention targeting substance abuse treatment in the criminal justice system

    Scott T. Walters;Steven J. Ondersma;Karen S. Ingersoll;Mayra Rodriguez

  • Pilot RCT of bidirectional text messaging for ART adherence among nonurban substance users with HIV.

    Karen S. Ingersoll;Rebecca A. Dillingham;Jennifer E. Hettema;Mark Conaway

  • Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Buprenorphine For Opioid Dependent Women in the Criminal Justice System

    Karen L. Cropsey;Peter S. Lane;Galen J. Hale;Dorothy O. Jackson

  • Respecting patients is associated with more patient-centered communication behaviors in clinical encounters.

    Tabor E. Flickinger;Somnath Saha;Somnath Saha;Debra Roter;P. Todd Korthuis

Frequent Co-Authors

Lee M. Ritterband
Lee M. Ritterband University of Virginia
Mark B. Sobell
Mark B. Sobell Nova Southeastern University
Carolyn J. Heckman
Carolyn J. Heckman Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Charles M. Morin
Charles M. Morin Université Laval
Linda C. Sobell
Linda C. Sobell Nova Southeastern University
Suzanne E. Mazzeo
Suzanne E. Mazzeo Virginia Commonwealth University
Karen L. Cropsey
Karen L. Cropsey University of Alabama at Birmingham
Tyrel J. Starks
Tyrel J. Starks City University of New York
Daniel J. Cox
Daniel J. Cox University of Virginia
Mark R. Conaway
Mark R. Conaway University of Virginia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in exploring psychology beyond traditional campus settings, online degrees offer a flexible route to enter this exciting field. Choosing the right program is important, as options vary by location, specialization, and rankings. Students can look to resources such as the best-ranked psychology degree programs in Oklahoma for guidance on quality and reputation.

Across the U.S., regional popularity and specialties may also shape your decision. For example, the popular psychology degrees in Orlando often focus on practical applications in urban settings. Meanwhile, access to top-ranked psychology degree programs in Reno is perfect for those interested in research-driven practice in the West.

In tech-driven cities, the most popular psychology degree programs in Seattle may appeal to students aspiring to integrate psychology with business, technology, or healthcare. These online degrees can pave the way for a variety of career pathways in counseling, education, research, and organizational development.

Best Scientists Citing Karen S. Ingersoll

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles