World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
80
Citations
27691
World Ranking
1434
National Ranking
862

Mark B. Sobell publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark B. Sobell sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 333 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark B. Sobell D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark B. Sobell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2002 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Mark B. Sobell is affiliated with Nova Southeastern University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with significant work in subfields including Pharmacology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, and General Health Professions.

Their research covers several key topics such as Coffee research and impacts, Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet, Eating Disorders and Behaviors, Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes, Health Policy Implementation Science, and Mental Health Treatment and Access.

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Mark B. Sobell are:

  • Programa de Auto-cambio Dirigido en abuso de alcohol en población española: un estudio de caso, 2020, Revista de PSICOLOGÍA DE LA SALUD
  • Reliability of a Timeline Followback measure of caffeinated coffee consumption, 2022, Addictive Behaviors
  • Commentaries on R. Mellor & A. Ritter (2020). Redressing Responses to the Treatment Gap for People with Alcohol Problems, 2020, SUCHT - Zeitschrift für Wissenschaft und Praxis / Journal of Addiction Research and Practice
  • Real world implementation of AlcoChange, a smartphone digital therapeutic to improve outcomes from alcohol-related liver disease: protocol for an individually randomised parallel group controlled trial, 2025, Trials

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Mark B. Sobell include:

  • Linda C. Sobell
  • José Luís Carballo
  • Ainhoa Coloma-Carmona
  • Alejandro Sánchez Sánchez
  • Brian Letourneau

Publication venues where Mark B. Sobell has contributed include:

  • Revista de PSICOLOGÍA DE LA SALUD
  • Addictive Behaviors
  • SUCHT - Zeitschrift für Wissenschaft und Praxis / Journal of Addiction Research and Practice
  • Trials

Mark B. Sobell has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) since 2002.

Best Publications

  • Timeline Follow-Back A Technique for Assessing Self-Reported Alcohol Consumption

    Linda C. Sobell;Mark B. Sobell

  • Reliability of a timeline method: assessing normal drinkers' reports of recent drinking and a comparative evaluation across several populations.

    Linda C. Sobell;Mark B. Sobell;Gloria I. Leo;Anthony Cancilla

  • Reliability of alcohol abusers' self-reports of drinking behavior.

    Linda C. Sobell;Stephen A. Maisto;Mark B. Sobell;A.Mitch Cooper

  • The reliability of the Alcohol Timeline Followback when administered by telephone and by computer

    Linda C. Sobell;Joanne Brown;Gloria I. Leo;Mark B. Sobell

  • Reliability of the Timeline Followback for cocaine, cannabis, and cigarette use.

    Sean M. Robinson;Linda Carter Sobell;Mark B. Sobell;Gloria I. Leo

  • The reliability of a timeline method for assessing normal drinker college students' recent drinking history: Utility for alcohol research.

    Mark B. Sobell;Linda C. Sobell;Felix Klajner;Daniel Pavan

  • Recovery from alcohol problems with and without treatment: prevalence in two population surveys.

    Linda C. Sobell;John A. Cunningham;Mark B. Sobell

  • Natural Recovery from Alcohol and Drug Problems: Methodological Review of the Research with Suggestions for Future Directions.

    Linda C. Sobell;Timothy P. Ellingstad;Mark B. Sobell

  • Individualized behavior therapy for alcoholics

    Mark B. Sobell;Linda C. Sobell

  • Alcohol Consumption Measures

    Linda C. Sobell;Mark B. Sobell

  • Stepped care as a heuristic approach to the treatment of alcohol problems.

    Mark B. Sobell;Linda C. Sobell

  • Barriers to treatment: Why alcohol and drug abusers delay or never seek treatment

    John A. Cunningham;Linda C. Sobell;Mark B. Sobell;Sangeeta Agrawal

  • 5-HT and alcohol abuse.

    Edward M. Sellers;Guy A. Higgins;Mark B. Sobell

  • Preventing alcohol-exposed pregnancies: a randomized controlled trial.

    R. Louise Floyd;Mark Sobell;Mary M. Velasquez;Karen Ingersoll

  • What triggers the resolution of alcohol problems without treatment.

    Linda C. Sobell;Mark B. Sobell;Tony Toneatto;Gloria I. Leo

  • RELIABILITY OF A FAMILY TREE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR ASSESSING FAMILY HISTORY OF ALCOHOL PROBLEMS

    Robert E. Mann;Linda C. Sobell;Mark B. Sobell;Daniel Pavan

  • Developing a Prototype for Evaluating Alcohol Treatment Effectiveness

    Mark B. Sobell;S. A. Maisto;Linda C. Sobell;A. M. Cooper

  • The reliability of alcohol abusers' self-reports of drinking and life events that occurred in the distant past.

    L C Sobell;M B Sobell;D M Riley;R Schuller

  • Second year treatment outcome of alcoholics treated by individualized behavior therapy: results.

    Mark B. Sobell;Linda C. Sobell

  • Problem Drinkers: Guided Self-Change Treatment

    Mark B. Sobell;Linda Carter Sobell

Frequent Co-Authors

Linda C. Sobell
Linda C. Sobell Nova Southeastern University
John A. Cunningham
John A. Cunningham Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Stephen A. Maisto
Stephen A. Maisto Syracuse University
David C. Hodgins
David C. Hodgins University of Calgary
Judith C. Barker
Judith C. Barker University of California, San Francisco
Tony Toneatto
Tony Toneatto University of Toronto
Edward M. Sellers
Edward M. Sellers University of Toronto
Karen S. Ingersoll
Karen S. Ingersoll University of Virginia
Lynn T. Kozlowski
Lynn T. Kozlowski University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Alan L. Peterson
Alan L. Peterson The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding career pathways, especially in fields such as applied behavior analysis. With the rising demand for Board Certified Behavior Analysts (BCBAs), many students are exploring specialized online degrees that meet these certification requirements.

Several cities offer unique guidance on certification. For those interested in working in Kentucky, this detailed guide on how to become a bcba in Lexington outlines degree prerequisites and supervised experience. Likewise, specific information about becoming a bcba in Lincoln helps students tailor their education and training for Nebraska’s requirements.

California has particular standards for this career. For instance, you can review the bcba certification requirements in Long Beach and the Los Angeles bcba requirements to better understand how location may impact your pathway.

Pursuing psychology online allows flexible learning while preparing for specialized roles like BCBA. Carefully review local certification requirements to maximize your future career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Mark B. Sobell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles