World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7156 6672 12 12 191 9905

Mauro V. Mendlowicz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mauro V. Mendlowicz between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mauro V. Mendlowicz published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 7 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2011. 7 of the 237 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2011. 1992: 6 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 2 publications
1992 2025

237 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mauro V. Mendlowicz: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 6
1993 8
1994 10
1995 9
1996 7
1997 3
1998 2
1999 4
2000 6
2001 0
2002 3
2003 9
2004 10
2005 13
2006 6
2007 14
2008 8
2009 6
2010 6
2011 17
2012 8
2013 3
2014 5
2015 4
2016 7
2017 3
2018 4
2019 8
2020 7
2021 8
2022 15
2023 11
2024 5
2025 2
Total 237
Download as CSV

Mauro V. Mendlowicz publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mauro V. Mendlowicz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 191 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 191
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mauro V. Mendlowicz D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mauro V. Mendlowicz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mauro V. Mendlowicz is affiliated with Fluminense Federal University in Brazil and has contributed extensively to the field of psychology, with a specific focus on clinical psychology. Their body of work spans multiple subfields including general health professions, epidemiology, psychiatry and mental health, and neurology.

The scientist's main research topics cover a range of issues related to mental health and trauma. These include:

  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health

Numerous papers authored or coauthored by Mauro V. Mendlowicz have been published, several of which address the psychological impacts of trauma and mental health conditions. Recent papers include:

  • The invisible scars of emotional abuse: a common and highly harmful form of childhood maltreatment, 2021, BMC Psychiatry
  • Vulnerability and Protective Factors for PTSD and Depression Symptoms Among Healthcare Workers During COVID-19: A Machine Learning Approach, 2022, Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Comportamento Violento Perpetrado por Mulheres: um Estudo Brasileiro, 2022, Anais da Academia Nacional de Medicina
  • To BDZ or not to BDZ? That is the question! Is there reliable scientific evidence for or against using benzodiazepines in the aftermath of potentially traumatic events for the prevention of PTSD? A systematic review and meta-analysis, 2022, Journal of Psychopharmacology
  • Post-traumatic stress disorder as a predictor for incident hypertension: a 3-year retrospective cohort study, 2021, Psychological Medicine

Mauro V. Mendlowicz has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • William Berger
  • Ivan Figueira
  • Mariana Pires Luz
  • Eliane Volchan
  • Letícia Oliveira

Their work has appeared most often in notable publication venues such as:

  • Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria
  • BMC Psychiatry
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders
  • Debates em Psiquiatria
  • Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry

The academic focus on psychology comprises 54 publications, with 48 in clinical psychology. The diversity in subfields reflects an interdisciplinary approach that includes epidemiology and neurology alongside psychiatric and mental health concerns.

Best Publications

  • Quality of Life in Individuals With Anxiety Disorders

    Mauro V. Mendlowicz;Murray B. Stein

  • Rescuers at risk: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis of the worldwide current prevalence and correlates of PTSD in rescue workers

    William Berger;William Berger;Evandro Silva Freire Coutinho;Ivan Figueira;Carla Marques-Portella

  • TEMPS-A: validation of a short version of a self-rated instrument designed to measure variations in temperament.

    Hagop S. Akiskal;Hagop S. Akiskal;Mauro V. Mendlowicz;Mauro V. Mendlowicz;Girardin Jean-Louis;Mark H. Rapaport;Mark H. Rapaport

  • Pharmacologic alternatives to antidepressants in posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review.

    William Berger;Mauro V. Mendlowicz;Mauro V. Mendlowicz;Carla Marques-Portella;Gustavo Kinrys

  • The validity of the Beck Depression Inventory-Short Form as a screening and diagnostic instrument for moderate and severe depression in medical inpatients

    Letícia M. Furlanetto;Mauro V. Mendlowicz;Mauro V. Mendlowicz;J. Romildo Bueno

  • The descriptive epidemiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Leonardo F. Fontenelle;Mauro V. Mendlowicz;Mauro V. Mendlowicz;Marcio Versiani

  • Post-traumatic stress symptoms in an elite unit of Brazilian police officers: Prevalence and impact on psychosocial functioning and on physical and mental health

    Deborah B. Maia;Charles R. Marmar;Thomas Metzler;Augusta Nóbrega

  • Early- and late-onset obsessive-compulsive disorder in adult patients: an exploratory clinical and therapeutic study.

    Leonardo F. Fontenelle;Mauro V. Mendlowicz;Mauro V. Mendlowicz;Carla Marques;Marcio Versiani

  • Anxiety disorders in outpatients with schizophrenia: prevalence and impact on the subjective quality of life.

    Raphael J. Braga;Mauro V. Mendlowicz;Mauro V. Mendlowicz;Rogério P. Marrocos;Ivan L. Figueira

  • Trans-cultural aspects of obsessive-compulsive disorder: A description of a Brazilian sample and a systematic review of international clinical studies

    Leonardo F Fontenelle;Mauro V Mendlowicz;Carla Marques;Marcio Versiani

  • Quality of life and symptom dimensions of patients with obsessive―compulsive disorder

    Isabela S. Fontenelle;Leonardo F. Fontenelle;Leonardo F. Fontenelle;Manuela C. Borges;Angélica M. Prazeres

  • Is there tonic immobility in humans? Biological evidence from victims of traumatic stress.

    Eliane Volchan;Gabriela G. Souza;Camila M. Franklin;Carlos E. Norte

  • Partial and full PTSD in Brazilian ambulance workers: Prevalence and impact on health and on quality of life

    William Berger;Ivan Figueira;Ana Maria Maurat;Érika P. Bucassio

  • Peritraumatic tonic immobility predicts a poor response to pharmacological treatment in victims of urban violence with PTSD.

    Adriana Fiszman;Mauro V. Mendlowicz;Carla Marques-Portella;Eliane Volchan

  • Posttraumatic stress disorder in parents of children with chronic illnesses: a meta-analysis.

    Mariana Cabizuca;Carla Marques-Portella;Mauro V. Mendlowicz;Evandro S. F. Coutinho

  • The impact of tonic immobility reaction on the prognosis of posttraumatic stress disorder.

    Alessandra A. Lima;Adriana Fiszman;Carla Marques-Portella;Mauro V. Mendlowicz

  • Does D-Cycloserine Enhance Exposure Therapy for Anxiety Disorders in Humans? A Meta-Analysis

    Helga Rodrigues;Ivan Figueira;Alessandra Lopes;Raquel Gonçalves

  • Diagnóstico do transtorno de estresse pós-traumático

    Ivan Figueira;Mauro Mendlowicz

  • A comparison of recovered bipolar patients, healthy relatives of bipolar probands, and normal controls using the short TEMPS-A.

    Mauro V. Mendlowicz;Mauro V. Mendlowicz;Girardin Jean-Louis;John R. Kelsoe;Hagop S. Akiskal

  • Equivalência semântica da versão em português da Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist - Civilian Version (PCL-C) para rastreamento do transtorno de estresse pós-traumático

    William Berger;Mauro Vitor Mendlowicz;Wanderson F. Souza;Ivan Figueira

  • Impulse control disorders in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Leonardo F. Fontenelle;Mauro V. Mendlowicz;Marcio Versiani

Frequent Co-Authors

Ivan Figueira
Ivan Figueira Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
Leonardo F. Fontenelle
Leonardo F. Fontenelle Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
Antonio Egidio Nardi
Antonio Egidio Nardi Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
Evandro Silva Freire Coutinho
Evandro Silva Freire Coutinho Rio de Janeiro State University
Mark Hyman Rapaport
Mark Hyman Rapaport Emory University
Hagop S. Akiskal
Hagop S. Akiskal University of California, San Diego
John R. Kelsoe
John R. Kelsoe University of California, San Diego
J. Christian Gillin
J. Christian Gillin University of California, San Diego
Jerson Laks
Jerson Laks Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
Charles R. Marmar
Charles R. Marmar New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up a variety of online study options and career pathways, especially if you are interested in becoming a licensed counselor. Many universities now offer flexible online degrees that align with key licensure requirements in different states.

Each state sets its own standards and procedures for licensure. For example, if you plan on practicing counseling in the Midwest, it's important to review the Iowa lpc licensure requirements and the Kansas licensed professional counselor requirements. Both states detail required coursework, supervised practice hours, and state-specific exams.

Similarly, the lpc licensure requirements in Kentucky and Louisiana lpc licensure requirements outline tailored processes for aspiring counselors, including distinct educational prerequisites and application procedures.

Make sure to choose an online psychology program that meets the requirements of the state where you plan to build your career. Each pathway provides unique opportunities, whether your interest is in clinical practice, research, or educational roles within the field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Mauro V. Mendlowicz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles