World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
Hungary
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
57
Citations
11239
World Ranking
4058
National Ranking
7

Xenia Gonda publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xenia Gonda sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 452 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Xenia Gonda D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xenia Gonda sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Hungary Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in Hungary Leader Award

Overview

Xenia Gonda is affiliated with Semmelweis University in Hungary and has contributed extensively to research in medicine and psychology, with a special focus on clinical psychology and psychiatry. Their publication record spans a broad range of subfields, including psychiatry and mental health, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, biological psychiatry, and social psychology.

The scientist's main areas of research include topics such as tryptophan and brain disorders, bipolar disorder and its treatment, stress responses and cortisol, suicide and self-harm studies, cardiac health and mental health, COVID-19 and mental health, and various mental health research topics.

Frequent co-authors in Gonda's research collaborations include Gabriella Juhász, György Bagdy, Dóra Török, Nóra Eszlári, and Zsófia Gál. Their work has been published repeatedly in key scientific journals, with frequent contributions to Neuroscience Applied, European Neuropsychopharmacology, European Psychiatry, Scientific Reports, and Frontiers in Psychiatry.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Xenia Gonda cover significant topics in neuropsychopharmacology, psychiatry, and mental health:

  • "Bipolar disorders: an update on critical aspects", 2024, The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
  • "Results of the COVID-19 mental health international for the general population (COMET-G) study", 2021, European Neuropsychopharmacology
  • "Novel antidepressant drugs: Beyond monoamine targets", 2021, CNS Spectrums
  • "Well-being, resilience and post-traumatic growth in the era of Covid-19 pandemic", 2021, European Neuropsychopharmacology

These publications reflect ongoing investigations into mental health effects during the COVID-19 pandemic, advancements in antidepressant drug development, and the complexities of bipolar disorders.

The diverse research portfolio, spanning over 135 publications in medicine and 106 in psychology, demonstrates involvement in both clinical and theoretical dimensions of mental health sciences. The intersection between cardiac health and mental health is also a notable recurrent theme.

Best Publications

  • Autism Spectrum Disorder: Classification, diagnosis and therapy

    Samata R. Sharma;Xenia Gonda;Frank I. Tarazi

  • Epidemiology of suicide in bipolar disorders: a systematic review of the literature.

    Maurizio Pompili;Xenia Gonda;Gianluca Serafini;Marco Innamorati

  • Collaborative meta-analysis finds no evidence of a strong interaction between stress and 5-HTTLPR genotype contributing to the development of depression

    R. C. Culverhouse;N. L. Saccone;A. C. Horton;Y. Ma

  • Suicidal behavior in bipolar disorder: epidemiology, characteristics and major risk factors.

    Xenia Gonda;Maurizio Pompili;Maurizio Pompili;Gianluca Serafini;Franco Montebovi

  • Suicide Risk in Bipolar Disorder: A Brief Review.

    Peter Dome;Zoltan Rihmer;Xenia Gonda

  • Association of the s allele of the 5-HTTLPR with neuroticism-related traits and temperaments in a psychiatrically healthy population

    Xenia Gonda;Konstantinos N. Fountoulakis;Gabriella Juhasz;Zoltan Rihmer

  • The role of cognitive dysfunction in the symptoms and remission from depression.

    Xénia Gonda;Maurizio Pompili;Gianluca Serafini;Andre Ferrer Carvalho

  • The 5HTTLPR polymorphism of the serotonin transporter gene is associated with affective temperaments as measured by TEMPS-A

    Xenia Gonda;Zoltan Rihmer;Terezia Zsombok;Gyorgy Bagdy

  • Extreme sensory processing patterns show a complex association with depression, and impulsivity, alexithymia, and hopelessness

    Gianluca Serafini;Xenia Gonda;Giovanna Canepa;Maurizio Pompili

  • Relationship of suicide rates to economic variables in Europe: 2000-2011

    Konstantinos N. Fountoulakis;Wolfram Kawohl;Pavlos N. Theodorakis;Ad J.F.M. Kerkhof

  • A study of affective temperaments in Hungary: Internal consistency and concurrent validity of the TEMPS-A against the TCI and NEO-PI-R

    Sándor Rózsa;Zoltán Rihmer;Xénia Gonda;Ilona Szili

  • Patterns of mood changes throughout the reproductive cycle in healthy women without premenstrual dysphoric disorders.

    X. Gonda;T. Telek;Gabriella Juhasz;J. Lazary

  • ALEXITHYMIA AND SUICIDE RISK IN PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERS: A MINI REVIEW

    Domenico De Berardis;Michele Fornaro;Laura Orsolini;Alessandro Valchera

  • Rapid cycling in bipolar disorder: a systematic review.

    André F. Carvalho;Dimos Dimellis;Xenia Gonda;Eduard Vieta

  • The relationship between sensory processing patterns, alexithymia, traumatic childhood experiences, and quality of life among patients with unipolar and bipolar disorders.

    Gianluca Serafini;Xenia Gonda;Maurizio Pompili;Zoltan Rihmer

  • Affective temperaments in general population: A review and combined analysis from national studies

    Gustavo H. Vázquez;Leonardo Tondo;Lorenzo Mazzarini;Xenia Gonda

  • Results of the COVID-19 mental health international for the general population (COMET-G) study.

    Konstantinos N. Fountoulakis;Grigorios Karakatsoulis;Seri Abraham;Kristina Adorjan

  • New evidence for the association of the serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4) haplotypes, threatening life events, and depressive phenotype.

    Judit Lazary;Aron Lazary;Xenia Gonda;Anita Benko

  • Affective temperaments, as measured by TEMPS-A, among nonviolent suicide attempters

    Annamaria Rihmer;Sandor Rozsa;Zoltan Rihmer;Xenia Gonda

  • Subthreshold depression is linked to the functional polymorphism of the 5HT transporter gene

    Xenia Gonda;Gabriella Juhasz;Andras Laszik;Zoltan Rihmer

  • Collaborative meta-analysis finds no evidence of a strong interaction between stress and 5-HTTLPR genotype contributing to the development of depression

    Robert C. Culverhouse;Nancy L. Saccone;Amy C. Horton;Yinjiao Ma

Frequent Co-Authors

Gyorgy Bagdy
Gyorgy Bagdy Semmelweis University
Zoltan Rihmer
Zoltan Rihmer Semmelweis University
Maurizio Pompili
Maurizio Pompili Sapienza University of Rome
Konstantinos N. Fountoulakis
Konstantinos N. Fountoulakis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Gianluca Serafini
Gianluca Serafini University of Genoa
Mario Amore
Mario Amore University of Genoa
Hagop S. Akiskal
Hagop S. Akiskal University of California, San Diego
Ian M. Anderson
Ian M. Anderson University of Manchester
Paolo Girardi
Paolo Girardi Sapienza University of Rome
Marco Innamorati
Marco Innamorati European University of Rome

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Psychology opens up diverse career options, including counseling, research, education, and mental health services. Many students are interested in finding efficient pathways to launch their careers, especially in states where demand for counselors is high. If you are eager to enter the workforce quickly, you’ll want to consider programs that offer accelerated tracks and flexible online formats.

For instance, if you want to pursue the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Iowa, look for regionally accredited degree programs that fulfill state requirements and offer practicum opportunities. Similarly, you can research Kansas fastest counseling programs to discover options tailored to students who need a faster timeline.

Each state has unique licensure requirements, so it’s important to select a program aligned with your goals. For example, investigate the fastest way to become a counselor in Kentucky and the fastest way to become a counselor in Louisiana to see which programs best suit your needs. Taking time to compare online degrees and career pathways can help you make informed decisions and achieve your professional goals sooner.

Best Scientists Citing Xenia Gonda

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles