World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
Hungary
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 64 2934 2694 6 6 394 18992

Zoltan Rihmer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Zoltan Rihmer between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Zoltan Rihmer published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 8.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2011. 5 of the 410 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2011. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 7 publications 1983: 8 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 3 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 4 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 26 publications 2010: 25 publications 2011: 27 publications 2012: 25 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 1 publication
1980 2025

410 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Zoltan Rihmer: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 1
1982 7
1983 8
1984 5
1985 3
1986 6
1987 3
1988 3
1989 1
1990 3
1991 1
1992 1
1993 4
1994 3
1995 3
1996 5
1997 4
1998 9
1999 7
2000 10
2001 4
2002 4
2003 9
2004 3
2005 5
2006 5
2007 20
2008 15
2009 26
2010 25
2011 27
2012 25
2013 14
2014 22
2015 23
2016 19
2017 15
2018 13
2019 6
2020 7
2021 14
2022 9
2023 7
2024 4
2025 1
Total 410
Download as CSV

Zoltan Rihmer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zoltan Rihmer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 391–400 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 394 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57 394
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Zoltan Rihmer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zoltan Rihmer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290 64
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Hungary Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in Hungary Leader Award

Overview

Zoltan Rihmer is affiliated with Semmelweis University in Hungary and has built a research profile primarily focused on medicine and psychology. Their academic output spans several subfields including cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, clinical psychology, psychiatry and mental health, endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, as well as experimental and cognitive psychology.

The main topics of their research encompass:

  • Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Diabetes Management and Education
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health

Rihmer's work has been published in various scientific journals, with the most frequent venues including:

  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Orvosi Hetilap
  • Lege Artis Medicinae
  • Annals of General Psychiatry
  • European Psychiatry

Their recent papers include:

  • "Untreated depressive symptoms significantly worsen quality of life in old age and may lead to the misdiagnosis of dementia: a cross-sectional study," 2020, Annals of General Psychiatry
  • "Clinical characteristics of treatment-resistant depression in adults in Hungary: Real-world evidence from a 7-year-long retrospective data analysis," 2021, PLoS ONE
  • "Evaluation of affective temperaments and arterial stiffness in different hypertension phenotypes," 2020, Hypertension Research
  • "Investigation of the association between lithium levels in drinking water and suicide mortality in Hungary," 2021, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • "Nature and Nurture: Effects of Affective Temperaments on Depressive Symptoms Are Markedly Modified by Stress Exposure," 2020, Frontiers in Psychiatry

Frequent collaborators in Rihmer's research include:

  • Xénia Gonda
  • Péter Döme
  • János Nemcsik
  • Péter Torzsa
  • Beáta Kőrösi

Throughout their career, Zoltan Rihmer has contributed extensively to understanding the interaction between mental health and cardiovascular conditions, as well as the clinical aspects of affective disorders. Their work also addresses important public health topics such as suicide risk and treatment-resistant depression.

Best Publications

  • Suicide prevention strategies: a systematic review.

    John J Mann;Alan Apter;Jose Bertolote;Annette Beautrais

  • The International Society for bipolar Disorders (ISBD) task force report on antidepressant use in bipolar disorders

    Isabella Pacchiarotti;David J. Bond;Ross J. Baldessarini;Willem A. Nolen

  • Suicide risk in mood disorders.

    Zoltán Rihmer

  • The European Psychiatric Association (EPA) guidance on suicide treatment and prevention.

    Danuta Wasserman;Zoltan Rihmer;D. Rujescu;M. Sarchiapone

  • Agitated "unipolar" depression re-conceptualized as a depressive mixed state: implications for the antidepressant-suicide controversy.

    Hagop S. Akiskal;Franco Benazzi;Giulio Perugi;Zoltán Rihmer

  • International Society for Bipolar Disorders Task Force on Suicide: meta-analyses and meta-regression of correlates of suicide attempts and suicide deaths in bipolar disorder.

    Ayal Schaffer;Erkki T. Isometsä;Leonardo Tondo;Doris H Moreno

  • Epidemiology of suicide in bipolar disorders: a systematic review of the literature.

    Maurizio Pompili;Xenia Gonda;Gianluca Serafini;Marco Innamorati

  • Current research on affective temperaments

    Zoltán Rihmer;Kareen K Akiskal;Annamária Rihmer;Hagop S Akiskal

  • A suicide prevention program in a region with a very high suicide rate.

    Katalin Szanto;Sandor Kalmar;Herbert Hendin;Zoltan Rihmer

  • Prevention of male suicides: lessons from Gotland study

    Wolfgang Rutz;Lars von Knorring;Hans Pihlgren;Zoltan Rihmer

  • Suicidal behavior in bipolar disorder: epidemiology, characteristics and major risk factors.

    Xenia Gonda;Maurizio Pompili;Maurizio Pompili;Gianluca Serafini;Franco Montebovi

  • Smoking, nicotine and neuropsychiatric disorders

    Peter Dome;Judit Lazary;Miklos Peter Kalapos;Zoltan Rihmer

  • Retrospective psychiatric assessment of 200 suicides in Budapest

    M. Arato;E. Demeter;Zoltan Rihmer;E. Somogyi

  • Suicide Risk in Bipolar Disorder: A Brief Review.

    Peter Dome;Zoltan Rihmer;Xenia Gonda

  • Association of the s allele of the 5-HTTLPR with neuroticism-related traits and temperaments in a psychiatrically healthy population

    Xenia Gonda;Konstantinos N. Fountoulakis;Gabriella Juhasz;Zoltan Rihmer

  • Bipolar disorders and suicidal behaviour

    Unknown

  • The role of cognitive dysfunction in the symptoms and remission from depression.

    Xénia Gonda;Maurizio Pompili;Gianluca Serafini;Andre Ferrer Carvalho

  • The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for the Biological Treatment of Bipolar Disorders, Part III: Maintenance Treatment

    Heinz Grunze;Siegfried Kasper;Guy Goodwin;Charles Bowden

  • Do antidepressants t(h)reat(en) depressives? Toward a clinically judicious formulation of the antidepressant-suicidality FDA advisory in light of declining national suicide statistics from many countries.

    Zoltan Rihmer;Hagop S. Akiskal

  • Epidemiology, neurobiology and pharmacological interventions related to suicide deaths and suicide attempts in bipolar disorder: Part I of a report of the International Society for Bipolar Disorders Task Force on Suicide in Bipolar Disorder.

    Ayal Schaffer;Erkki T Isometsä;Leonardo Tondo;Doris H Moreno

  • The 5HTTLPR polymorphism of the serotonin transporter gene is associated with affective temperaments as measured by TEMPS-A

    Xenia Gonda;Zoltan Rihmer;Terezia Zsombok;Gyorgy Bagdy

  • Extreme sensory processing patterns show a complex association with depression, and impulsivity, alexithymia, and hopelessness

    Gianluca Serafini;Xenia Gonda;Giovanna Canepa;Maurizio Pompili

  • Relationship of suicide rates to economic variables in Europe: 2000-2011

    Konstantinos N. Fountoulakis;Wolfram Kawohl;Pavlos N. Theodorakis;Ad J.F.M. Kerkhof

Frequent Co-Authors

Xenia Gonda
Xenia Gonda Semmelweis University
Maurizio Pompili
Maurizio Pompili Sapienza University of Rome
Gianluca Serafini
Gianluca Serafini University of Genoa
Paolo Girardi
Paolo Girardi Sapienza University of Rome
Mario Amore
Mario Amore University of Genoa
Hagop S. Akiskal
Hagop S. Akiskal University of California, San Diego
Marco Innamorati
Marco Innamorati European University of Rome
Gyorgy Bagdy
Gyorgy Bagdy Semmelweis University
Konstantinos N. Fountoulakis
Konstantinos N. Fountoulakis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
David Lester
David Lester Richard Stockton College of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens doors to diverse online degree programs and evolving career opportunities. Many students interested in mental health pursue specialized roles, such as substance abuse counseling, which is in high demand across different regions. An advantage of modern online programs is the flexibility they offer for both study and credentialing, helping students meet specific local licensure criteria.

It’s important to understand that each city or state sets its own education and certification requirements. For instance, substance abuse counselor requirements in Aurora may differ from substance abuse counselor requirements in Austin. Similarly, the steps for becoming a substance abuse counselor in Bakersfield contrast with Baltimore substance abuse counselor certification requirements.

Prospective students should research regional regulations, online degree options, and practicum requirements to ensure they are on the right track for their chosen role. By tailoring your education to your career location, you can streamline your path to professional success in psychology-related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Zoltan Rihmer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles