World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 79 1522 1361 17 16 485 22437

Mario Amore publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mario Amore between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mario Amore published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 13.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 56 publications in 2021. 44 of the 585 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 56. Peak 56 publications in 2021. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 37 publications 2015: 36 publications 2016: 36 publications 2017: 41 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 55 publications 2021: 56 publications 2022: 34 publications 2023: 35 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 18 publications
1983 2025

585 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mario Amore: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 0
1985 1
1986 2
1987 2
1988 2
1989 0
1990 0
1991 3
1992 7
1993 1
1994 0
1995 4
1996 3
1997 7
1998 9
1999 3
2000 4
2001 2
2002 7
2003 2
2004 3
2005 0
2006 4
2007 15
2008 13
2009 12
2010 9
2011 10
2012 16
2013 26
2014 37
2015 36
2016 36
2017 41
2018 21
2019 22
2020 55
2021 56
2022 34
2023 35
2024 26
2025 18
Total 585
Download as CSV

Mario Amore publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mario Amore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 481–490 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 485 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28 485
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mario Amore D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mario Amore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137 79
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mario Amore is affiliated with the University of Genoa in Italy and has contributed extensively to research in medicine and psychology. Their work spans over 400 publications, with a strong focus on psychiatry and mental health as well as clinical psychology. Additional subfields of study include cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, and neurology.

Their research topics cover a broad range of areas, notably:

  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access

Among recent published papers, several have received significant citations, reflecting ongoing engagement with current mental health challenges. Key publications include:

  • "The psychological impact of COVID-19 on the mental health in the general population," 2020, QJM
  • "Screening for depression in primary care with Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9): A systematic review," 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • "COVID-19 Lockdown: Housing Built Environment's Effects on Mental Health," 2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with OCD: Effects of contamination symptoms and remission state before the quarantine in a preliminary naturalistic study," 2020, Psychiatry Research
  • "A Specific Inflammatory Profile Underlying Suicide Risk? Systematic Review of the Main Literature Findings," 2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Mario Amore frequently collaborates with other researchers, with the most frequent co-authors including:

  • Gianluca Serafini
  • Andrea Amerio
  • Andrea Aguglia
  • Alessandra Costanza
  • Andrea Escelsior

Their work often appears in publications such as:

  • European Psychiatry
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • PubMed
  • Brain Sciences
  • Psychiatry Research

Best Publications

  • The psychological impact of COVID-19 on the mental health in the general population.

    Gianluca Serafini;Bianca Parmigiani;Andrea Amerio;Andrea Aguglia

  • Screening for depression in primary care with Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9): A systematic review.

    Luigi Costantini;Cesira Pasquarella;Anna Odone;Maria Eugenia Colucci

  • The influence of illness-related variables, personal resources and context-related factors on real-life functioning of people with schizophrenia

    Silvana Galderisi;Alessandro Rossi;Paola Rocca;Alessandro Bertolino

  • COVID-19 lockdown: housing built environment’s effects on mental health

    Andrea Amerio;Andrea Amerio;Andrea Brambilla;Alessandro Morganti;Andrea Aguglia

  • Epidemiology of suicide in bipolar disorders: a systematic review of the literature.

    Maurizio Pompili;Xenia Gonda;Gianluca Serafini;Marco Innamorati

  • HPA axis and aging in depression: Systematic review and meta-analysis

    Martino Belvederi Murri;Martino Belvederi Murri;Carmine Pariante;Valeria Mondelli;Mattia Masotti

  • The HPA axis in bipolar disorder: Systematic review and meta-analysis

    Martino Belvederi Murri;Martino Belvederi Murri;Davide Prestia;Valeria Mondelli;Carmine Pariante

  • Autonomic dysfunction and heart rate variability in depression.

    Andrea Sgoifo;Luca Carnevali;Maria de los Angeles Pico Alfonso;Mario Amore

  • Predictors of violent behavior among acute psychiatric patients: clinical study.

    Mario Amore;Marco Menchetti;Cristina Tonti;Fabiano Scarlatti

  • Duration of untreated illness and outcomes in unipolar depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Lucio Ghio;Simona Gotelli;Maurizio Marcenaro;Mario Amore

  • Contrasting variability patterns in the default mode and sensorimotor networks balance in bipolar depression and mania

    Matteo Martino;Paola Magioncalda;Zirui Huang;Benedetta Conio

  • The role of ketamine in treatment-resistant depression: a systematic review.

    Gianluca Serafini;Robert H Howland;Fabiana Rovedi;Paolo Girardi

  • Opposite effects of dopamine and serotonin on resting-state networks: review and implications for psychiatric disorders.

    Benedetta Conio;Matteo Martino;Paola Magioncalda;Andrea Escelsior

  • The Relationship between Childhood Maltreatment and Non-Suicidal Self-Injury: A Systematic Review.

    Gianluca Serafini;Giovanna Canepa;Giulia Adavastro;Jacopo Nebbia

  • Posttraumatic stress disorder and suicide risk among veterans: A literature review

    Maurizio Pompili;Leo Sher;Gianluca Serafini;Alberto Forte

  • Life adversities and suicidal behavior in young individuals: a systematic review

    Gianluca Serafini;Caterina Muzio;Giulia Piccinini;Eirini Flouri

  • Suicide risk in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of current literature.

    Maurizio Pompili;Maurizio Pompili;Alberto Forte;Mario Palermo;Henry Stefani

  • Bisexuality and Suicide: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature

    Maurizio Pompili;David Lester;Alberto Forte;Maria Elena Seretti

  • Second-Generation Antipsychotics and Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome: Systematic Review and Case Report Analysis

    Martino Belvederi Murri;Martino Belvederi Murri;Argentina Guaglianone;Michele Bugliani;Pietro Calcagno

  • Depression and apathy in dementia: Same syndrome or different constructs? A critical review

    P. Tagariello;P. Girardi;M. Amore

  • Clinical and pharmacologic risk factors for neuroleptic malignant syndrome: a case–control study

    Domenico Berardi;Mario Amore;Paul E Keck;Mario Troia

Frequent Co-Authors

Maurizio Pompili
Maurizio Pompili Sapienza University of Rome
Gianluca Serafini
Gianluca Serafini University of Genoa
Paolo Girardi
Paolo Girardi Sapienza University of Rome
Marco Innamorati
Marco Innamorati European University of Rome
Martino Belvederi Murri
Martino Belvederi Murri University of Ferrara
David Lester
David Lester Richard Stockton College of New Jersey
Xenia Gonda
Xenia Gonda Semmelweis University
Dorian A. Lamis
Dorian A. Lamis Emory University
Maria Augusta Raggi
Maria Augusta Raggi University of Bologna
Zoltan Rihmer
Zoltan Rihmer Semmelweis University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring further education and career opportunities in psychology opens several dynamic pathways. For those interested in the intersection of psychology and law, there are many jobs in criminal psychology, ranging from working with law enforcement to serving as expert witnesses or consultants.

Deciding which graduate degree best matches your goals is crucial. Many students wonder which is better msw or masters in counseling, as both offer unique advantages for careers in mental health, social work, and therapeutic services. Each choice leads to different licensing and professional opportunities.

Time and flexibility are major considerations for today’s learners. If you’re seeking accessible programs, you’ll find many easy psychology degrees online that cater to diverse backgrounds and busy schedules. These programs are ideal if you’re getting started or balancing other commitments.

For those looking to advance quickly, several universities now offer accelerated psychology masters program options. These streamlined pathways can help you earn your degree faster, allowing you to launch or enhance your psychology career sooner.

Best Scientists Citing Mario Amore

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles