World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
16720
World Ranking
7000
National Ranking
3068

Drew McDermott publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Drew McDermott sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 134 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Drew McDermott D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Drew McDermott sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1990 - Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)

Overview

Drew McDermott is affiliated with Yale University in the United States. Their academic work includes contributions to the field of artificial intelligence as indicated by their recognition as a Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) in 1990.

The profile of this scientist does not list specific publications, coauthors, or detailed research topics. However, their award by the AAAI positions them within the broader AI research community. This fellowship is an acknowledgment bestowed on individuals who have made significant contributions to the advancement of artificial intelligence.

No information is provided about particular fields or subfields of study, book publications, or frequent publication venues associated with Drew McDermott.

There are no records of recent papers, main topics of work, or frequent co-authors available in the data.

Best Publications

  • Introduction to Artificial Intelligence

    Eugene Charniak;Drew McDermott

  • Non-monotonic logic I

    D. McDermott;J. Doyle

  • A temporal logic for reasoning about processes and plans

    Drew V. McDermott

  • DAML-S: Web Service Description for the Semantic Web

    Mark H. Burstein;Jerry R. Hobbs;Ora Lassila;David Martin

  • Bringing semantics to web services: the OWL-S approach

    David Martin;Massimo Paolucci;Sheila McIlraith;Mark Burstein

  • Bringing Semantics to Web Services with OWL-S

    David Martin;Mark Burstein;Drew Mcdermott;Sheila Mcilraith

  • Nonmonotonic logic and temporal projection

    S. Hanks;D. McDermott

  • Nonmonotonic Logic II: Nonmonotonic Modal Theories

    Drew McDermott

  • Temporal data base management

    Thomas L. Dean;Drew McDermott

  • Artificial Intelligence Programming

    Eugene Charniak;James R. Meehan;Christopher K. Reisbeck;Drew V. McDermott

  • Default reasoning, nonmonotonic logics, and the frame problem

    Steve Hanks;Drew McDermott

  • A critique of pure reason

    Drew McDermott

  • Artificial intelligence meets natural stupidity

    Drew McDermott

  • Estimated-regression planning for interactions with web services

    Drew McDermott

  • Planning Routes through uncertain territory

    Drew McDermott;Ernest Davis

  • Planning and Acting

    Drew McDermott

  • Error correction in mobile robot map learning

    S.P. Engelson;D.V. McDermott

  • Ontology translation on the semantic web

    Dejing Dou;Drew McDermott;Peishen Qi

  • A heuristic estimator for means-ends analysis in planning

    Drew McDermott

  • From PLANNER to CONNIVER: a genetic approach

    Gerald Jay Sussman;Drew Vincent McDermott

  • Ontology translation by ontology merging and automated reasoning

    Dejing Dou;Drew V. Mcdermott

Frequent Co-Authors

Eugene Charniak
Eugene Charniak Brown University
Dejing Dou
Dejing Dou University of Oregon
Michael Beetz
Michael Beetz University of Bremen
Mark Gerstein
Mark Gerstein Yale University
Yoav Shoham
Yoav Shoham Stanford University
Gregory D. Hager
Gregory D. Hager Johns Hopkins University
Massimo Paolucci
Massimo Paolucci NTT (Japan)
Katia Sycara
Katia Sycara Carnegie Mellon University
Sheila A. McIlraith
Sheila A. McIlraith University of Toronto
Philip M. Kim
Philip M. Kim University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education opens up diverse pathways for computer science students and professionals. Many learners begin with foundational credentials like the shortest associate degree program, which allows for rapid entry into the tech job market or continued academic advancement.

Aspiring leaders in education technology or IT administration may consider online educational leadership programs. These can be a gateway to influential roles that shape how technology is integrated within educational settings.

Selecting the right online university is crucial for career prospects. Many students research popular online colleges to ensure their degree is credible and widely recognized by employers.

For those interested in creative tech careers, the rise of video game design programs offers a specialized path to enter the fast-growing gaming industry, combining programming skills with artistic vision.

With so many affordable and accessible options, it’s easier than ever to tailor your education to match your career goals in technology and computer science.

Best Scientists Citing Drew McDermott

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles