World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
48
Citations
12849
World Ranking
6071
National Ranking
364

Derek Long publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Derek Long sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 202 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Derek Long D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Derek Long sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Derek Long is a researcher affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their work predominantly lies within the field of Computer Science, with a strong emphasis on Artificial Intelligence. Over their career, they have contributed to 24 publications in this area, exploring several specialized subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Ocean Engineering, Safety Research, Software, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

The primary topics Derek Long has investigated include AI-based Problem Solving and Planning, Semantic Web and Ontologies, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI, Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge, Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning, and Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques.

Frequent collaborators in Derek Long's work include Benjamin Krarup, Senka Krivić, Maria Fox, Laurence A. Nafié, and Hiro-o Hamaguchi, indicating sustained research relationships and joint projects.

Derek Long has publications in various venues, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of their research. Key publication venues include arXiv (Cornell University), the Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, the Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, PubMed, and AI Communications.

Representative recent papers authored or co-authored by Derek Long include:

  • Contrastive Explanations of Plans through Model Restrictions (2021, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research)
  • Reasoning and Interaction for Social Artificial Intelligence (2022, AI Communications)
  • Towards Contrastive Explanations for Comparing the Ethics of Plans (2020, arXiv (Cornell University))
  • Optimization of Fermentation Processes in Intelligent Biomanufacturing: On Online Monitoring, Artificial Intelligence, and Digital Twin Technologies (2025, PubMed)
  • Understanding a Robot's Guiding Ethical Principles via Automatically Generated Explanations (2022, 2022 IEEE 18th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE))

The research topics covered in these works reflect an intersection between ethical considerations in AI, explainability, planning, and applied artificial intelligence in domains such as biomanufacturing. The scientific output shows engagement with contemporary issues in AI ethics and explainability alongside technical advancements.

Best Publications

  • PDDL2.1: an extension to PDDL for expressing temporal planning domains

    Maria Fox;Derek Long

  • The 3rd international planning competition: results and analysis

    Derek Long;Maria Fox

  • Deterministic planning in the fifth international planning competition: PDDL3 and experimental evaluation of the planners

    Alfonso E. Gerevini;Patrik Haslum;Derek Long;Alessandro Saetti

  • Plan Constraints and Preferences in PDDL3

    Alfonso Gerevini;Derek Long

  • Forward-chaining partial-order planning

    Amanda Coles;Andrew Coles;Maria Fox;Derek Long

  • The automatic inference of state invariants in TIM

    Maria Fox;Derek Long

  • Modelling mixed discrete-continuous domains for planning

    Maria Fox;Derek Long

  • Plan stability: replanning versus plan repair

    Maria Fox;Alfonso Gerevini;Derek Long;Ivan Serina

  • VAL: automatic plan validation, continuous effects and mixed initiative planning using PDDL

    R. Howey;D. Long;M. Fox

  • ROSPlan: planning in the robot operating system

    Michael Cashmore;Maria Fox;Derek Long;Daniele Magazzeni

  • The Detection and Exploitation of Symmetry in Planning Problems

    Maria Fox;Derek Long

  • Efficient implementation of the plan graph in STAN

    Derek Long;Maria Fox

  • COLIN: planning with continuous linear numeric change

    Amanda Coles;Andrew Coles;Maria Fox;Derek Long

  • IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

    Josef Bajada;Maria Fox;Derek Long

  • Preferences and soft constraints in PDDL3

    A. Gerevini;D. Long

  • Learning macro-actions for arbitrary planners and domains

    M. A. Hakim Newton;John Levine;Maria Fox;Derek Long

  • Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

    Chiara Piacentini;Maria Fox;Derek Long

  • Planning with problems requiring temporal coordination

    Andrew Coles;Maria Fox;Derek Long;Amanda Smith

  • Exploiting a Graphplan framework in temporal planning

    Derek Long;Maria Fox

  • Explainable Planning

    Maria Fox;Derek Long;Daniele Magazzeni

  • Proceedings of International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling

    Andrew Coles;Maria Fox;Derek Long;Amanda Coles

  • ROSPlan: Planning in the Robot Operating System

    Michael Cashmore;Maria Fox;Derek Long;Daniele Magazzeni

  • Proceedings of OCEANS'13 MTS/IEEE

    Michael Cashmore;Maria Fox;Tom Larkworthy;Derek Long

  • Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2014)

    Michael Cashmore;Maria Fox;Tom Larkworthy;Derek Long

  • Efficient Implementation of the Plan Graph in STAN

    M. Fox;D. Long

Frequent Co-Authors

Maria Fox
Maria Fox British Antarctic Survey
Chris Reed
Chris Reed University of Dundee
Jörg Hoffmann
Jörg Hoffmann Saarland University
Mark J. Weal
Mark J. Weal University of Southampton
Ruth Aylett
Ruth Aylett Heriot-Watt University
Timothy J. Norman
Timothy J. Norman University of Southampton
Nicholas R. Jennings
Nicholas R. Jennings Loughborough University
Michael Luck
Michael Luck University of Sussex
Kostas J. Kyriakopoulos
Kostas J. Kyriakopoulos National Technical University of Athens

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying computer science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of related academic and career paths. For students seeking flexibility, there are many online options across STEM fields. For example, if you’re interested in physics, you might wonder, can you get a physics degree online? The answer is yes, with several accredited programs offering distance learning.

Data science is also a booming field—many universities offer data science degrees online, providing advanced skills in analytics and machine learning. If your interests lean toward technology and innovation, consider exploring electrical engineering degree online admissions for top-rated online programs that prepare you for dynamic industries.

For those looking for faster entry into the job market, there are also valuable short certificate programs that pay well. These certifications offer practical, in-demand skills geared for high-paying roles without the time commitment of a full degree. Exploring these pathways can help you customize your education and career in technology.

Best Scientists Citing Derek Long

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles