World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
62
Citations
14039
World Ranking
2930
National Ranking
1441

Subbarao Kambhampati publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Subbarao Kambhampati sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 382 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Subbarao Kambhampati D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Subbarao Kambhampati sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - ACM Fellow For contributions to automated planning and human-aware AI systems and leadership within the field
  • 2017 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Subbarao Kambhampati is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States and has an extensive publication record in computer science, with a focus on artificial intelligence and related subfields.

Their research spans multiple areas within computer science, particularly artificial intelligence, with significant contributions to subfields including computer vision and pattern recognition, computer networks and communications, social psychology, and information systems. Specific research topics covered include:

  • AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Topic Modeling
  • Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge

Kambhampati has published in a variety of highly regarded venues, with frequent appearances in the following:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling
  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media

The scientist has authored several papers with notable examples including:

  • "Dude, srsly?: The Surprisingly Formal Nature of Twitter's Language" (2021), Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "ET-LDA: Joint Topic Modeling for Aligning Events and their Twitter Feedback" (2021), Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "On the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models: A Critical Investigation" (2023), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "PlanBench: An Extensible Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Planning and Reasoning about Change" (2022), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Challenges of Human-Aware AI Systems: AAAI Presidential Address" (2020), AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence)

Collaboration forms an important part of Kambhampati's work, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Sarath Sreedharan
  • Mudit Verma
  • Karthik Valmeekam
  • Anagha Kulkarni
  • Sailik Sengupta

In addition to journal articles and conference papers, Kambhampati has published a book titled Explainable Human-AI Interaction in 2022 through Morgan & Claypool Publishers.

The scientist's work in automated planning and human-aware AI systems has been recognized by the wider scientific community through awards such as:

  • ACM Fellow (2019) for contributions to automated planning and human-aware AI systems and leadership within the field
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (2017)

Best Publications

  • What We Instagram: A First Analysis of Instagram Photo Content and User Types

    Yuheng Hu;Lydia Manikonda;Subbarao Kambhampati

  • Multiresolution path planning for mobile robots

    S. Kambhampati;L. Davis

  • A validation-structure-based theory of plan modification and reuse

    Subbarao Kambhampati;James A. Hendler

  • Sapa: a multi-objective metric temporal planner

    Minh B. Do;Subbarao Kambhampati

  • Planning as refinement search: a unified framework for evaluating design tradeoffs in partial-order planning

    Subbarao Kambhampati;Craig A. Knoblock;Qiang Yang

  • Integration of biological sources: current systems and challenges ahead

    Thomas Hernandez;Subbarao Kambhampati

  • Plan explanations as model reconciliation: Moving beyond explanation as soliloquy

    Tathagata Chakraborti;Sarath Sreedharan;Yu Zhang;Subbarao Kambhampati

  • Planning as constraint satisfaction: solving the planning graph by compiling it into CSP

    Minh Binh Do;Subbarao Kambhampati

  • Reviving partial order planning

    XuanLong Nguyen;Subbarao Kambhampati

  • A Survey of Moving Target Defenses for Network Security

    Sailik Sengupta;Ankur Chowdhary;Abdulhakim Sabur;Adel Alshamrani

  • When is temporal planning really temporal

    William Cushing;Subbarao Kambhampati;Daniel S. Weld

  • Planning and scheduling

    Thomas L. Dean;Subbarao Kambhampati

  • Planning graph heuristics for belief space search

    Daniel Bryce;Subbarao Kambhampati;David E. Smith

  • Probabilistic planning via determinization in hindsight

    Sungwook Yoon;Alan Fern;Robert Givan;Subbarao Kambhampati

  • Sapa: A Domain-Independent Heuristic Metric Temporal Planner

    Minh Do;Subbarao Kambhampati

  • Plan explicability and predictability for robot task planning

    Yu Zhang;Sarath Sreedharan;Anagha Kulkarni;Tathagata Chakraborti

  • A snapshot of public web services

    Jianchun Fan;Subbarao Kambhampati

  • Understanding and Extending Graphplan

    Subbarao Kambhampati;Eric Parker;Eric Lambrecht

  • Effective approaches for partial satisfaction (over-subscription) planning

    Menkes van den Briel;Romeo Sanchez;Minh B. Do;Subbarao Kambhampati

  • Planning graph as the basis for deriving heuristics for plan synthesis by state space and CSP search

    XuanLong Nguyen;Subbarao Kambhampati;Romeo S. Nigenda

Frequent Co-Authors

James A. Hendler
James A. Hendler Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Matthias Scheutz
Matthias Scheutz Tufts University
Baoxin Li
Baoxin Li Shaanxi Normal University
Dijiang Huang
Dijiang Huang Arizona State University
Mark R. Cutkosky
Mark R. Cutkosky Stanford University
Gail-Joon Ahn
Gail-Joon Ahn Arizona State University
Manuela Veloso
Manuela Veloso Carnegie Mellon University
Craig A. Knoblock
Craig A. Knoblock University of Southern California
Thomas G. Dietterich
Thomas G. Dietterich Oregon State University
Jami J. Shah
Jami J. Shah The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a variety of academic and career options. Many students now consider combining tech skills with specialties such as management, information science, or organizational leadership to expand their prospects. Pursuing executive mba online programs is a popular step for professionals seeking to advance into leadership roles while maintaining a tech focus.

For those interested in data management, digital libraries, or archiving, online mlis programs offer a great way to combine computer science with library and information science expertise. Additionally, it’s easier than ever to upskill with an affordable master degree online, providing flexibility and cost savings.

For those aiming at the highest academic levels, a phd in leadership and management online can unlock opportunities in academia and executive roles. These online pathways make it easier to tailor your education and career goals in today’s evolving tech landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Subbarao Kambhampati

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles