World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Thomas Eiter

Thomas Eiter

Award Badge
Computer Science
Austria
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
76
Citations
23050
World Ranking
1342
National Ranking
10

Thomas Eiter publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Eiter sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 490 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Thomas Eiter D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Eiter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Computer Science in Austria Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Austria Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Austria Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Austria Leader Award
  • 2020 - ACM Fellow For contributions to knowledge representation and reasoning, logic programming, and declarative problem solving
  • 2016 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Thomas Eiter is affiliated with TU Wien in Austria and has a significant body of research primarily in computer science with a focus on artificial intelligence.

The main research fields of Thomas Eiter include:

  • Computer Science

Within computer science, the key subfields of study are:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Applied Mathematics
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

The main topics covered in Thomas Eiter's work include:

  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization
  • Navier-Stokes Equation Solutions
  • Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
  • Advanced Database Systems and Queries

Thomas Eiter has contributed to numerous publications with a variety of frequent co-authors. These collaborators include:

  • Johannes Oetsch
  • Rafael Kiesel
  • Tobias Geibinger
  • Nysret Musliu
  • Daria Stepanova

The scientist's research has appeared in multiple well-known venues, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science

Among Thomas Eiter's recent papers are:

  • "Query Rewriting for Horn-SHIQ Plus Rules" (2021) published in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "A Neuro-Symbolic ASP Pipeline for Visual Question Answering" (2022) published in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming

Other notable papers associated with the scientist's research network include:

  • "A Scalable Reasoning and Learning Approach for Neural-Symbolic Stream Fusion" (2021) in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "Abstraction for non-ground answer set programs" (2021) published in Artificial Intelligence
  • "Omission-Based Abstraction for Answer Set Programs" (2020) in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming

Thomas Eiter has contributed to academic book publications as well, including a title published by Springer Science+Business Media:

  • Prolog: The Next 50 Years (2023)

Recognition of Thomas Eiter's scientific contributions includes the following awards:

  • ACM Fellow (2020) for contributions to knowledge representation and reasoning, logic programming, and declarative problem solving
  • Member of Academia Europaea (2016)

Best Publications

  • The DLV system for knowledge representation and reasoning

    Nicola Leone;Gerald Pfeifer;Wolfgang Faber;Thomas Eiter

  • Complexity and expressive power of logic programming

    Evgeny Dantsin;Thomas Eiter;Georg Gottlob;Andrei Voronkov

  • Answer set programming at a glance

    Gerhard Brewka;Thomas Eiter;Mirosław Truszczyński

  • Combining answer set programming with description logics for the Semantic Web

    Thomas Eiter;Giovambattista Ianni;Thomas Lukasiewicz;Roman Schindlauer

  • Disjunctive datalog

    Thomas Eiter;Georg Gottlob;Heikki Mannila

  • Combining answer set programming with description logics for the semantic web

    Thomas Eiter;Thomas Lukasiewicz;Roman Schindlauer;Hans Tompits

  • On the complexity of propositional knowledge base revision, updates, and counterfactuals

    Thomas Eiter;Georg Gottlob

  • The complexity of logic-based abduction

    Thomas Eiter;Georg Gottlob

  • Identifying the Minimal Transversals of a Hypergraph and Related Problems

    Thomas Eiter;Georg Gottlob

  • On the computational cost of disjunctive logic programming: Propositional case

    Thomas Eiter;Georg Gottlob

  • Preferred answer sets for extended logic programs

    Gerhard Brewka;Thomas Eiter

  • A uniform integration of higher-order reasoning and external evaluations in answer-set programming

    Thomas Eiter;Giovambattista Ianni;Roman Schindlauer;Hans Tompits

  • Distance measures for point sets and their computation

    Thomas Eiter;Heikki Mannila

  • Answer Set Programming: A Primer

    Thomas Eiter;Giovambattista Ianni;Thomas Krennwallner

  • The KR system dlv: progress report, comparisons and benchmarks

    Thomas Eiter;Nicola Leone;Cristinel Mateis;Gerald Pfeifer

  • Propositional circumscription and extended closed-world reasoning are P p 2 -complete

    Thomas Eiter;Georg Gottlob

  • Equilibria in heterogeneous nonmonotonic multi-context systems

    Gerhard Brewka;Thomas Eiter

  • A Deductive System for Non-Monotonic Reasoning

    Thomas Eiter;Nicola Leone;Cristinel Mateis;Gerald Pfeifer

  • Declarative problem-solving using the DLV system

    Thomas Eiter;Wolfgang Faber;Nicola Leone;Gerald Pfeifer

  • New Results on Monotone Dualization and Generating Hypergraph Transversals

    Thomas Eiter;Georg Gottlob;Kazuhisa Makino

Frequent Co-Authors

Georg Gottlob
Georg Gottlob University of Calabria
Nicola Leone
Nicola Leone University of Calabria
Wolfgang Faber
Wolfgang Faber University of Klagenfurt
Axel Polleres
Axel Polleres Vienna University of Economics and Business
Thomas Lukasiewicz
Thomas Lukasiewicz University of Oxford
Gerhard Brewka
Gerhard Brewka Leipzig University
V. S. Subrahmanian
V. S. Subrahmanian Dartmouth College
Toshihide Ibaraki
Toshihide Ibaraki Kyoto College of Graduate Studies for Informatics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Computer Science degree in the USA opens up a wide array of online learning and career opportunities. Students seeking affordability may want to explore programs recognized as the cheapest bachelor's degree online, which can provide flexibility and cost savings without sacrificing quality.

For those interested in technical fields, there are numerous engineering degrees online that offer specialized skills relevant to today’s job market. These programs prepare graduates for work in technology, infrastructure, and beyond.

Professionals looking to elevate their careers further may consider the best online executive mba programs. These online MBAs are designed for working individuals ready to move into leadership roles, combining business acumen with flexibility.

Additionally, those interested in information management and digital resources can investigate the mlis degree online cost to understand tuition options for this growing field. Exploring these online pathways helps students match their education to their career goals and financial needs.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Eiter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles