World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Paul Henning Krogh

Paul Henning Krogh

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
52
Citations
7284
World Ranking
16878
National Ranking
182

Paul Henning Krogh publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Henning Krogh sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 152 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Paul Henning Krogh D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Henning Krogh sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul Henning Krogh is affiliated with Aarhus University in Denmark, where their research focuses on agricultural and biological sciences as well as environmental science. Their work spans several interconnected subfields including ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, soil science, plant science, and molecular biology.

The scientist's research covers a wide array of topics, with significant attention to invertebrate taxonomy and ecology, environmental DNA in biodiversity studies, soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics, and Collembola taxonomy and ecology studies. Other key topics include microbial community ecology and physiology, study of mite species, and insect and arachnid ecology and behavior.

Paul Henning Krogh has contributed publications to multiple venues, frequently publishing in journals such as Applied Soil Ecology, SSRN Electronic Journal, European Journal of Soil Biology, Functional Ecology, and Ecology and Evolution.

Their recent papers include:

  • Insights into the earthworm gut multi-kingdom microbial communities, 2020, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Water availability rather than temperature control soil fauna community structure and prey-predator interactions, 2020, Functional Ecology
  • KEYLINK: towards a more integrative soil representation for inclusion in ecosystem scale models. I. review and model concept, 2020, PeerJ
  • Functional and Taxonomic Diversity of Collembola as Complementary Tools to Assess Land Use Effects on Soils Biodiversity, 2021, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
  • The effect of Bt crops on soil invertebrates: a systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis, 2020, Transgenic Research

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Paul Henning Krogh include Anne Winding, Jérôme Cortet, Mickaël Hedde, Rumakanta Sapkota, and Jonathan Bonfanti.

Best Publications

  • Soil ecotoxicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in relation to soil sorption, lipophilicity, and water solubility.

    Line E. Sverdrup;Torben Nielsen;Paul Henning Krogh

  • Effects of the antibiotics oxytetracycline and tylosin on soil fauna.

    Angel J Baguer;John Jensen;Paul Henning Krogh

  • Recycling of sewage sludge and household compost to arable land: fate and effects of organic contaminants, and impact on soil fertility

    Søren O. Petersen;K. Henriksen;G.K. Mortensen;P.H. Krogh

  • Effects of acclimation temperature on thermal tolerance and membrane phospholipid composition in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster

    Johannes Overgaard;Aleš Tomčala;Jesper G. Sørensen;Martin Holmstrup

  • Is energy cropping in Europe compatible with biodiversity? – Opportunities and threats to biodiversity from land-based production of biomass for bioenergy purposes

    Bas Pedroli;Berien Elbersen;Pia Frederiksen;Ulf Grandin

  • Soil microbial and faunal community responses to bt maize and insecticide in two soils.

    Bryan S. Griffiths;Sandra Caul;Jacqueline Thompson;A. Nicholas E. Birch

  • Toxicity of eight polycyclic aromatic compounds to red clover (Trifolium pratense), ryegrass (Lolium perenne), and mustard (Sinapsis alba).

    Line E. Sverdrup;Paul Henning Krogh;Torben Nielsen;Christian Kjær

  • The toxicity testing of double-walled nanotubes-contaminated food to Eisenia veneta earthworms.

    J.J. Scott-Fordsmand;P.H. Krogh;M. Schaefer;A. Johansen

  • NORMA-Gene: a simple and robust method for qPCR normalization based on target gene data.

    Lars-Henrik Heckmann;Peter B Sørensen;Paul Henning Krogh;Jesper G Sørensen

  • Mapping earthworm communities in Europe

    Michiel Rutgers;Alberto Orgiazzi;Ciro Gardi;Jörg Römbke

  • A qualitative multi-attribute model for economic and ecological assessment of genetically modified crops

    Marko Bohanec;Antoine Messéan;Sara Scatasta;Frédérique Angevin

  • Pesticide Side Effects in an Agricultural Soil Ecosystem as Measured by amoA Expression Quantification and Bacterial Diversity Changes

    Louise Feld;Mathis Hjort Hjelmsø;Morten Schostag Nielsen;Anne Dorthe Jacobsen

  • A Comparison of Soil Microbial Community Structure, Protozoa and Nematodes in Field Plots of Conventional and Genetically Modified Maize Expressing the Bacillus thuringiens is CryIAb Toxin

    B.S. Griffiths;S. Caul;J. Thompson;A.N.E. Birch

  • Can Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) corn residues and Bt-corn plants affect life-history traits in the earthworm Aporrectodea caliginosa?

    Maria Laura Vercesi;Paul Henning Krogh;Martin Holmstrup

  • Varietal effects of eight paired lines of transgenic Bt maize and near-isogenic non- Bt maize on soil microbial and nematode community structure

    Bryan S. Griffiths;Lars-Henrik Heckmann;Sandra Caul;Jacqueline Thompson

  • Exposure and effects assessments of Bt-maize on non-target organisms (gastropods, microarthropods, mycorrhizal fungi) in microcosms

    Annette de Vaufleury;Paulina E. Kramarz;Paulina E. Kramarz;Philippe Binet;Jérome Cortet

  • Microbial and microfaunal community structure in cropping systems with genetically modified plants

    Bryan S. Griffiths;Sandra Caul;Jacqueline Thompson;A. Nicholas E. Birch

  • Effects of the antibacterial agents tiamulin, olanquindox and metronidazole and the anthelmintic ivermectin on the soil invertebrate species Folsomia fimetaria (Collembola) and Enchytraeus crypticus (Enchytraeidae)

    John Jensen;Paul Henning Krogh;Line E. Sverdrup

  • Benzo(a)pyrene shows low toxicity to three species of terrestrial plants, two soil invertebrates, and soil-nitrifying bacteria.

    Line E. Sverdrup;Snorre B. Hagen;Paul Henning Krogh;Cornelis A.M. van Gestel

  • Establishing a community-wide DNA barcode library as a new tool for arctic research

    H. Wirta;G. Várkonyi;C. Rasmussen;R. Kaartinen

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Holmstrup
Martin Holmstrup Aarhus University
Bryan S. Griffiths
Bryan S. Griffiths Scotland's Rural College
Mathias Neumann Andersen
Mathias Neumann Andersen Aarhus University
Jørgen Eriksen
Jørgen Eriksen Aarhus University
Janeck J. Scott-Fordsmand
Janeck J. Scott-Fordsmand Aarhus University
Christian Damgaard
Christian Damgaard Aarhus University
Carsten S. Jacobsen
Carsten S. Jacobsen Aarhus University
Richard Joffre
Richard Joffre Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Flemming Ekelund
Flemming Ekelund University of Copenhagen
Olaf Schmidt
Olaf Schmidt University College Dublin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA can open doors to diverse, in-demand careers within healthcare, research, and technology. For those interested in the nutrition field, there are numerous nutrition degree programs available online, providing flexible and accelerated pathways into roles such as dietitians and nutritionists.

Leadership roles in healthcare organizations are also within reach after a science background. An online healthcare MBA is a popular option for those aiming to move into healthcare administration, combining business acumen with scientific expertise.

For students considering data-driven healthcare roles, medical coding offers strong salary prospects and remote work options. It is important to understand the ccs vs cpc certifications, as the credentials can affect future job opportunities and earning potential. Additionally, learning about the certified medical coder salary can help you decide if this pathway aligns with your goals.

Whether you’re interested in advanced nutrition, healthcare leadership, or specialized coding careers, online programs make it easier than ever to build your future in the rapidly-evolving life sciences sector.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Henning Krogh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles