World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Plant Science and Agronomy
Ireland
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
54
Citations
12546
World Ranking
1673
National Ranking
3

Olaf Schmidt publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olaf Schmidt sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 207 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Olaf Schmidt D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olaf Schmidt sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Ireland Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Ireland Leader Award

Best Publications

  • Soil networks become more connected and take up more carbon as nature restoration progresses

    Elly Morriën;S. Emilia Hannula;L. Basten Snoek;Nico R. Helmsing

  • The Plant Cell Wall–Decomposing Machinery Underlies the Functional Diversity of Forest Fungi

    Daniel C. Eastwood;Dimitrios Floudas;Manfred Binder;Andrzej Majcherczyk

  • Feeding habits and multifunctional classification of soil‐associated consumers from protists to vertebrates

    Unknown

  • Conventional tillage decreases the abundance and biomass of earthworms and alters their community structure in a global meta-analysis.

    María Jesús I. Briones;María Jesús I. Briones;Olaf Schmidt

  • Inferring the origin and dietary history of beef from C, N and S stable isotope ratio analysis

    O. Schmidt;J.M. Quilter;B. Bahar;A.P. Moloney

  • Gut wall bacteria of earthworms: a natural selection process

    Dwipendra Thakuria;Olaf Schmidt;Dillon Finan;Damian Egan

  • Land-use and land-management change: relationships with earthworm and fungi communities and soil structural properties

    David J Spurgeon;Aidan M Keith;Olaf Schmidt;Dennis R Lammertsma

  • A critical review of current methods in earthworm ecology: From individuals to populations

    Mark D. Bartlett;Maria J.I. Briones;Roy Neilson;Olaf Schmidt

  • Why do cereal–legume intercrops support large earthworm populations?

    O Schmidt;R.O Clements;G Donaldson

  • Intensive cultivation can drastically reduce earthworm populations in arable land

    James P. Curry;David Byrne;Olaf Schmidt

  • Indoor wood-decay basidiomycetes: damage, causal fungi, physiology, identification and characterization, prevention and control

    Unknown

  • Mapping earthworm communities in Europe

    Michiel Rutgers;Alberto Orgiazzi;Ciro Gardi;Jörg Römbke

  • Alteration of the carbon and nitrogen stable isotope composition of beef by substitution of grass silage with maize silage.

    Bojlul Bahar;Frank J. Monahan;Aidan P. Moloney;Padraig O'Kiely

  • Relationships between earthworm populations and management intensity in cattle-grazed pastures in Ireland

    James P. Curry;Paul Doherty;Gordon Purvis;Olaf Schmidt

  • Dual stable isotope analysis (δ13C and δ15N) of soil invertebrates and their food sources

    Olaf Schmidt;James P Curry;Jens Dyckmans;Emilia Rota

  • Selecting cost effective and policy-relevant biological indicators for European monitoring of soil biodiversity and ecosystem function

    B.s. Griffiths;J. Römbke;R.m. Schmelz;A. Scheffczyk

  • Sulphur isotopes in animal hair track distance to sea

    A. Zazzo;F. J. Monahan;A. P. Moloney;S. Green

  • Influence of mineral soil on the palatability of organic matter for lumbricid earthworms: a simple food preference study.

    Bernard M. Doube;Olaf Schmidt;Ken Killham;Ray Correll

  • Natural abundance of 15N and 13C in earthworms from a wheat and a wheat-clover field

    O. Schmidt;C.M. Scrimgeour;L.L. Handley

  • Carbon and nitrogen stable isotope ratios in body tissue and mucus of feeding and fasting earthworms ( Lumbricus festivus )

    Olaf Schmidt;Charles M. Scrimgeour;James P. Curry

  • Importance of DNA quality in comparative soil microbial community structure analyses

    Dwipendra Thakuria;Olaf Schmidt;Máirtín Mac Siúrtáin;Damien Egan

  • Biochar and Earthworm Effects on Soil Nitrous Oxide and Carbon Dioxide Emissions

    Cara A. Augustenborg;Simone Hepp;Claudia Kammann;David Hagan

  • Earthworm communities in conventional wheat monocropping and low-input wheat-clover intercropping systems

    O Schmidt;J P Curry;R A Hackett;G Purvis

  • Distinct microbial and faunal communities and translocated carbon in Lumbricus terrestris drilospheres

    Mary E. Stromberger;Aidan M. Keith;Olaf Schmidt

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank J. Monahan
Frank J. Monahan University College Dublin
Charles M. Scrimgeour
Charles M. Scrimgeour James Hutton Institute
Thomas Bolger
Thomas Bolger University College Dublin
A.P. Moloney
A.P. Moloney Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority
Fiona M. Doohan
Fiona M. Doohan University College Dublin
Rachel Creamer
Rachel Creamer Wageningen University & Research
Antoine Zazzo
Antoine Zazzo French National Museum of Natural History
Rogier P.O. Schulte
Rogier P.O. Schulte Wageningen University & Research
Christian Mulder
Christian Mulder University of Catania
Michael Bonkowski
Michael Bonkowski University of Cologne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Olaf Schmidt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles