World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robert B. Chatfield

Robert B. Chatfield

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
44
Citations
7828
World Ranking
6720
National Ranking
2397

Robert B. Chatfield publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert B. Chatfield sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 140 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Robert B. Chatfield D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert B. Chatfield sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert B. Chatfield is affiliated with the Ames Research Center in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences.

The scientist's work focuses on subfields such as Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis; Global and Planetary Change; Atmospheric Science; Environmental Engineering; and Automotive Engineering. The main topics addressed include Air Quality and Health Impacts, Atmospheric aerosols and clouds, Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Climate Change and Health Impacts, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, and Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting.

Recent scholarly contributions by Robert B. Chatfield include the following papers:

  • Aerosol characteristics from earth observation systems: A comprehensive investigation over South Asia (2000-2019), 2021, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Estimation of High-Resolution PM2.5 over the Indo-Gangetic Plain by Fusion of Satellite Data, Meteorology, and Land Use Variables, 2020, Environmental Science & Technology
  • Review: Strategies for using satellite-based products in modeling PM2.5 and short-term pollution episodes, 2020, Environment International
  • Gradient boosting machine learning to improve satellite-derived column water vapor measurement error, 2020, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • Neighborhood-scale ambient NO2 concentrations using TROPOMI NO2 data: Applications for spatially comprehensive exposure assessment, 2022, The Science of The Total Environment

Frequent collaborators in Robert B. Chatfield's research include:

  • Meytar Sorek-Hamer
  • Alexei Lyapustin
  • Yang Liu
  • Alaa Mhawish
  • Tirthankar Banerjee

Their publications often appear in journals such as:

  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Environment International
  • The Science of The Total Environment

Best Publications

  • Estimates on the production of CO and H2 from the oxidation of hydrocarbon emissions from vegetation

    Patrick R. Zimmerman;Robert B. Chatfield;Jack Fishman;Paul J. Crutzen

  • Including the sub-grid scale plume rise of vegetation fires in low resolution atmospheric transport models

    S. R. Freitas;K. M. Longo;R. Chatfield;D. Latham

  • Monitoring the transport of biomass burning emissions in South America

    Saulo R. Freitas;Karla M. Longo;Maria A. F. Silva Dias;Pedro L. Silva Dias

  • Sulfur dioxide in remote oceanic air: Cloud transport of reactive precursors

    Robert B. Chatfield;Paul J. Crutzen

  • Dimethyl sulfide in the marine atmosphere

    M. O. Andreae;R. J. Ferek;F. Bermond;K. P. Byrd

  • The Coupled Aerosol and Tracer Transport model to the Brazilian developments on the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (CATT-BRAMS) – Part 1: Model description and evaluation

    S. R. Freitas;K. M. Longo;M. A. F. Silva Dias;M. A. F. Silva Dias;R. Chatfield

  • Organic material in the global troposphere

    R. A. Duce;V. A. Mohnen;P. R. Zimmerman;D. Grosjean

  • Analysis of the atmospheric distribution, sources, and sinks of oxygenated volatile organic chemicals based on measurements over the Pacific during TRACE‐P

    H. B. Singh;L. J. Salas;R. B. Chatfield;E. Czech

  • Measurements and model simulations of the photostationary state during the Mauna Loa Observatory Photochemistry Experiment: Implications for radical concentrations and ozone production and loss rates

    B. A. Ridley;S. Madronich;R. B. Chatfield;J. G. Walega

  • A comparison of scavenging and deposition processes in global models: results from the WCRP Cambridge Workshop of 1995

    P. J. Rasch;J. Feichter;K. Law;N. Mahowald

  • Comparison and evaluation of MODIS Multi-angle Implementation of Atmospheric Correction (MAIAC) aerosol product over South Asia

    Alaa Mhawish;Tirthankar Banerjee;Meytar Sorek-Hamer;Alexei Lyapustin

  • Convection links biomass burning to increased tropical ozone : however, models will tend to overpredict O3

    Robert B. Chatfield;Anthony C. Delany

  • Are there interactions of iodine and sulfur species in marine air photochemistry

    Robert B. Chatfield;Paul J. Crutzen

  • Intercontinental chemical transport experiment ozonesonde network study (IONS) 2004 : 1. Summertime upper troposphere/lower stratosphere ozone over northeastern North America.

    Anne M. Thompson;Jesse B. Stone;Jacquelyn C. Witte;Sonya K. Miller

  • First Directly Retrieved Global Distribution of Tropospheric Column Ozone from GOME: Comparison with the GEOS-CHEM Model

    Xiong Liu;Kelly V. Chance;Christopher E. Sioris;Thomas Paul Kurosu

  • Anomalous HNO3/NOx ratio of remote tropospheric air: Conversion of nitric acid to formic acid and NOx?

    Robert B. Chatfield

  • Enhancing the Applicability of Satellite Remote Sensing for PM2.5 Estimation Using MODIS Deep Blue AOD and Land Use Regression in California, United States.

    Hyung Joo Lee;Robert B. Chatfield;Anthony W. Strawa

  • Sources and sinks of acetone in the troposphere: Behavior of reactive hydrocarbons and a stable product

    Robert B. Chatfield;Edward P. Gardner;Jack G. Calvert

  • Vertical distribution of dimethylsulphide in the marine atmosphere

    R. J. Ferek;R. J. Ferek;R. B. Chatfield;M. O. Andreae

  • Nitric acid scavenging by mineral and biomass burning aerosols

    A. Tabazadeh;M. Z. Jacobson;H. B. Singh;O. B. Toon

Frequent Co-Authors

Saulo R. Freitas
Saulo R. Freitas National Institute for Space Research
Daniel J. Jacob
Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University
Karla Maria Longo de Freitas
Karla Maria Longo de Freitas Universities Space Research Association
Alexei Lyapustin
Alexei Lyapustin Goddard Space Flight Center
Meinrat O. Andreae
Meinrat O. Andreae Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
David M. Broday
David M. Broday Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Randall V. Martin
Randall V. Martin Washington University in St. Louis
Jacquelyn C. Witte
Jacquelyn C. Witte National Center for Atmospheric Research
G. W. Sachse
G. W. Sachse Langley Research Center
M. J. Newchurch
M. J. Newchurch University of Alabama in Huntsville

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their knowledge beyond Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open new career opportunities. Many students consider programs like eds to edd programs online for leadership roles in education or policy, aligning well with environmental advocacy and sustainability education.

Social work is another impactful career path, especially in communities affected by environmental challenges. Finding the cheapest dsw program can make this transition more accessible for professionals wanting to support social and environmental justice.

For students seeking flexibility, an affordable online general studies degree offers a customizable curriculum that can incorporate environmental topics alongside other interests to create unique expertise.

Additionally, those prioritizing a straightforward academic path might explore what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get, enabling them to quickly attain credentials while planning interdisciplinary careers related to environmental sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Robert B. Chatfield

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles