World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Charles M. Scrimgeour

Charles M. Scrimgeour

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
54
Citations
8930
World Ranking
1735
National Ranking
149

Charles M. Scrimgeour publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles M. Scrimgeour sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 107 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Charles M. Scrimgeour D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles M. Scrimgeour sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Bacteria

His primary areas of study are Botany, Agronomy, Soil biology, Poaceae and Soil water. The concepts of his Botany study are interwoven with issues in Fractionation and Nitrate, Nitrate reductase. His studies deal with areas such as Soil organic matter, Nutrient, Soil microbiology and Mineralization as well as Agronomy.

In the field of Poaceae, his study on Hordeum vulgare overlaps with subjects such as Quantitative trait locus and Dwarfing. His work on Soil structure and Bulk soil is typically connected to Water transport and Glomalin as part of general Soil water study, connecting several disciplines of science. Within one scientific family, he focuses on topics pertaining to Hordeum under Shoot, and may sometimes address concerns connected to δ13C.

His most cited work include:

  • Mechanistic interpretation of carbon isotope discrimination by marine macroalgae and seagrasses. (238 citations)
  • Plant roots release phospholipid surfactants that modify the physical and chemical properties of soil (199 citations)
  • Using stable isotope natural abundances (δ15N and δ13C) to integrate the stress responses of wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum C. Koch.) genotypes (181 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Botany, Ecology, Agronomy, δ13C and Poaceae. Charles M. Scrimgeour mostly deals with Shoot in his studies of Botany. The Agronomy study combines topics in areas such as Soil biology and Soil water.

His work is dedicated to discovering how Soil water, Rhizosphere are connected with Soil carbon and other disciplines. Charles M. Scrimgeour has included themes like Seasonality, Photosynthesis, Mineralogy and Animal science in his δ13C study. His Poaceae research incorporates themes from Carbon dioxide, Horticulture and Plant physiology.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (34.52%)
  • Ecology (16.67%)
  • Agronomy (16.67%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2005-2012)?

  • Animal science (10.71%)
  • Ecology (16.67%)
  • δ13C (13.10%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Animal science, Ecology, δ13C, Soil water and Agronomy are his primary areas of study. His work in the fields of Animal science, such as Beef cattle, intersects with other areas such as Half-life. His work in the fields of δ15N overlaps with other areas such as Tricladida.

His δ15N research integrates issues from Isotope-ratio mass spectrometry, Mineralogy, Seasonality and Chemical composition. In the subject of general Soil water, his work in Soil biology and Soil structure is often linked to Water transport and Glomalin, thereby combining diverse domains of study. Specifically, his work in Agronomy is concerned with the study of Shoot.

Between 2005 and 2012, his most popular works were:

  • Disentangling the impact of AM fungi versus roots on soil structure and water transport (121 citations)
  • Soil microbial and faunal community responses to bt maize and insecticide in two soils. (118 citations)
  • Codeposition of Organic Carbon and Arsenic in Bengal Delta Aquifers (92 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Bacteria

His primary areas of investigation include Agronomy, Soil water, Soil biology, Seasonality and δ13C. His work on Cultivar and Hordeum vulgare as part of his general Agronomy study is frequently connected to Genetically modified organism and Genetically modified maize, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science. His Soil microbiology, Loam, Soil test and Soil classification study in the realm of Soil water interacts with subjects such as Deltamethrin.

His work carried out in the field of Soil biology brings together such families of science as Soil type, Bulk soil, Water content and Transpiration. His research integrates issues of Isotope-ratio mass spectrometry, δ15N, Mineralogy and Chemical composition in his study of Seasonality. His research on δ13C frequently links to adjacent areas such as Animal science.

Best Publications

  • Mechanistic interpretation of carbon isotope discrimination by marine macroalgae and seagrasses.

    John A. Raven;Andrew M. Johnston;Janet E. Kübler;Rebecca Korb

  • Plant roots release phospholipid surfactants that modify the physical and chemical properties of soil

    D. B. Read;A. G. Bengough;P. J. Gregory;J. W. Crawford

  • Inferring the origin and dietary history of beef from C, N and S stable isotope ratio analysis

    O. Schmidt;J.M. Quilter;B. Bahar;A.P. Moloney

  • Disentangling the impact of AM fungi versus roots on soil structure and water transport

    Paul D. Hallett;Debbie S. Feeney;A. Glyn Bengough;Matthias C. Rillig

  • Carbon transfer between plants and its control in networks of arbuscular mycorrhizas

    A. H. Fitter;J. D. Graves;N. K. Watkins;D. Robinson

  • Using stable isotope natural abundances (δ15N and δ13C) to integrate the stress responses of wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum C. Koch.) genotypes

    D. Robinson;L.L. Handley;C.M. Scrimgeour;D.C. Gordon

  • Substrate heterogeneity and microfauna in soil organic ‘hotspots’ as determinants of nitrogen capture and growth of ryegrass

    Michael Bonkowski;Bryan Griffiths;Charles Scrimgeour

  • AFLP variation in wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum C. Koch) with reference to salt tolerance and associated ecogeography

    H. Pakniyat;W. Powell;E. Baird;L. L. Handley

  • Stable isotope probing analysis of the influence of liming on root exudate utilization by soil microorganisms

    J. Ignacio Rangel-Castro;Ken Killham;Nick J Ostle;Graeme W Nicol

  • Soil microbial and faunal community responses to bt maize and insecticide in two soils.

    Bryan S. Griffiths;Sandra Caul;Jacqueline Thompson;A. Nicholas E. Birch

  • Phenotype/genotype associations for yield and salt tolerance in a barley mapping population segregating for two dwarfing genes.

    R. P. Ellis;B. P. Forster;D. C. Gordon;L. L. Handley

  • Stable isotope distribution in the major metabolites of source and sink organs of Solanum tuberosum L.: a powerful tool in the study of metabolic partitioning in intact plants

    Gerd Gleixner;Charles Scrimgeour;Hanns-Ludwig Schmidt;Roberto Viola

  • A theory for 15N/14N fractionation in nitrate-grown vascular plants

    David Robinson;L. L. Handley;C. M. Scrimgeour

  • Alteration of the carbon and nitrogen stable isotope composition of beef by substitution of grass silage with maize silage.

    Bojlul Bahar;Frank J. Monahan;Aidan P. Moloney;Padraig O'Kiely

  • Spatial variability of soil total C and N and their stable isotopes in an upland Scottish grassland

    C.A. Marriott;G. Hudson;D. Hamilton;R. Neilson

  • Dual stable isotope analysis (δ13C and δ15N) of soil invertebrates and their food sources

    Olaf Schmidt;James P Curry;Jens Dyckmans;Emilia Rota

  • A Comparison of Soil Microbial Community Structure, Protozoa and Nematodes in Field Plots of Conventional and Genetically Modified Maize Expressing the Bacillus thuringiens is CryIAb Toxin

    B.S. Griffiths;S. Caul;J. Thompson;A.N.E. Birch

  • Natural abundance of 15N and 13C in earthworms from a wheat and a wheat-clover field

    O. Schmidt;C.M. Scrimgeour;L.L. Handley

  • Variations of the natural abundances of nitrogen and carbon isotopes in Triticum aestivum, with special reference to phloem and xylem exudates

    T. Yoneyama;L. L. Handley;C.M. Scrimgeour;D. B. Fisher;D. B. Fisher

  • The Influence of Anoxia on Plants of Saline Habitats with Special Reference to the Sulphur Cycle

    John A. Raven;Charles M. Scrimgeour

  • Varietal effects of eight paired lines of transgenic Bt maize and near-isogenic non- Bt maize on soil microbial and nematode community structure

    Bryan S. Griffiths;Lars-Henrik Heckmann;Sandra Caul;Jacqueline Thompson

  • Carbon and nitrogen stable isotope ratios in body tissue and mucus of feeding and fasting earthworms ( Lumbricus festivus )

    Olaf Schmidt;Charles M. Scrimgeour;James P. Curry

  • Seaweeds in cold seas: evolution and carbon acquisition.

    John A. Raven;Andrew M. Johnston;Andrew M. Johnston;Janet E. Kübler;Janet E. Kübler;Rebecca Korb;Rebecca Korb

  • Shoot δ15N correlates with genotype and salt stress in barley

    L. L. Handley;D. Robinson;B. P. Forster;R. P. Ellis

Frequent Co-Authors

David G. Robinson
David G. Robinson Heidelberg University
Olaf Schmidt
Olaf Schmidt University College Dublin
John A. Raven
John A. Raven University of Dundee
Frank J. Monahan
Frank J. Monahan University College Dublin
Andrew A. Meharg
Andrew A. Meharg Queen's University Belfast
Brian P. Forster
Brian P. Forster International Atomic Energy Agency
Bryan S. Griffiths
Bryan S. Griffiths Scotland's Rural College
Alastair Fitter
Alastair Fitter University of York
James I. Prosser
James I. Prosser University of Aberdeen
Diana Walker
Diana Walker University of Western Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Charles M. Scrimgeour

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles