What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
Environmental chemistry, Toxicology, Eisenia fetida, Earthworm and Risk analysis are his primary areas of study. Ecotoxicology is the focus of his Environmental chemistry research. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Chlorpyrifos, Pesticide, Diazinon, Parathion and Acute toxicity.
His Eisenia fetida research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of In vitro and Silver nanoparticle. He does research in Earthworm, focusing on Eisenia specifically. His studies deal with areas such as Hazard and Nanotechnology as well as Risk analysis.
His most cited work include:
- Effects of pesticides on soil invertebrates in laboratory studies: a review and analysis using species sensitivity distributions. (126 citations)
- Effects of C60 fullerene nanoparticles on soil bacteria and protozoans (126 citations)
- Biomarkers in earthworms. (119 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Janeck J. Scott-Fordsmand mainly focuses on Environmental chemistry, Toxicology, Ecotoxicology, Earthworm and Eisenia fetida. His Environmental chemistry research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Soil water, Soil contamination, Contamination, Enchytraeus crypticus and Copper. The Toxicology study which covers EC50 that intersects with Transcriptome, Invertebrate and Botany.
Ecotoxicology is a subfield of Ecology that he tackles. In the field of Earthworm, his study on Eisenia and Oligochaeta overlaps with subjects such as Triclosan. Within one scientific family, Janeck J. Scott-Fordsmand focuses on topics pertaining to Silver nanoparticle under Eisenia fetida, and may sometimes address concerns connected to In vitro, Oxidative stress and Biochemistry.
He most often published in these fields:
- Environmental chemistry (28.77%)
- Toxicology (17.81%)
- Ecotoxicology (17.12%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?
- Enchytraeus crypticus (9.59%)
- Environmental chemistry (28.77%)
- EC50 (10.27%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Enchytraeus crypticus, Environmental chemistry, EC50, Risk analysis and Nanomaterials. His Environmental chemistry research incorporates elements of Hard metal, Nanoparticle, Transgenerational epigenetics, Cobalt and Dry weight. He combines subjects such as Transcriptome, Toxicology, Earthworm, Toxicogenomics and Metabolism with his study of EC50.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Pesticide, Atrazine, Population size and Springtail in addition to Toxicology. Janeck J. Scott-Fordsmand is studying Eisenia fetida, which is a component of Earthworm. His work deals with themes such as Cell, Biophysics, Ecotoxicology and Bioaccumulation, which intersect with Nanomaterials.
Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Environmental Impacts by Fragments Released from Nanoenabled Products: A Multiassay, Multimaterial Exploration by the SUN Approach (20 citations)
- The Essential Elements of a Risk Governance Framework for Current and Future Nanotechnologies (16 citations)
- High-throughput tool to discriminate effects of NMs (Cu-NPs, Cu-nanowires, CuNO3, and Cu salt aged): transcriptomics in Enchytraeus crypticus. (15 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
Janeck J. Scott-Fordsmand focuses on EC50, Environmental chemistry, Enchytraeus crypticus, Transcriptome and Toxicology. His studies in EC50 integrate themes in fields like Hard metal, Nanoparticle, Bioavailability, Cobalt and Earthworm. His Earthworm research is mostly focused on the topic Eisenia fetida.
His Environmental chemistry study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Biomass, Predation, Dry weight and Copper oxide, Copper. His research integrates issues of Ecotoxicology, Nanomaterials, Ecotoxicity and In vivo in his study of Enchytraeus crypticus. His Toxicology study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Pesticide, Atrazine, Hatching and Reproduction.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
