World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
59
Citations
11841
World Ranking
12598
National Ranking
5382

Robert Landsiedel publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Landsiedel sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 243 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Robert Landsiedel D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Landsiedel sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert Landsiedel is affiliated with BASF in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on biochemical, genetic, and molecular biology domains with a strong emphasis on toxicology and related subfields.

The scientist's work encompasses multiple subfields, including:

  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Molecular Biology
  • Materials Chemistry
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Research topics covered by their publications address:

  • Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Animal testing and alternatives
  • Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery

Landsiedel has contributed to a significant number of papers published in notable venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Archives of Toxicology
  • Toxicology Letters
  • Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
  • Nanotoxicology
  • Applied In Vitro Toxicology

Among recent publications are:

  • A novel 3D intestine barrier model to study the immune response upon exposure to microplastics, 2020, Archives of Toxicology
  • Predicting dissolution and transformation of inhaled nanoparticles in the lung using abiotic flow cells: The case of barium sulfate, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • In Silico Models to Predict the Perturbation of Molecular Initiating Events Related to Thyroid Hormone Homeostasis, 2020, Chemical Research in Toxicology
  • Variation in dissolution behavior among different nanoforms and its implication for grouping approaches in inhalation toxicity, 2021, NanoImpact
  • Replacing the refinement for skin sensitization testing: Considerations to the implementation of adverse outcome pathway (AOP)-based defined approaches (DA) in OECD guidelines, 2020, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Landsiedel frequently collaborates with colleagues such as Dorothee Funk-Weyer, Wendel Wohlleben, Barbara Birk, Lan Ma-Hock, and Naveed Honarvar, reflecting a collaborative approach in their extensive research projects.

Best Publications

  • Inhalation Toxicity of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes in Rats Exposed for 3 Months

    Lan Ma-Hock;Silke Treumann;Volker Strauss;Sandra Brill

  • Tissue distribution and toxicity of intravenously administered titanium dioxide nanoparticles in rats.

    Eric Fabian;Robert Landsiedel;Lan Ma-Hock;Karin Wiench

  • Genotoxicity investigations on nanomaterials: Methods, preparation and characterization of test material, potential artifacts and limitations—Many questions, some answers

    Robert Landsiedel;Maike Diana Kapp;Markus Schulz;Karin Wiench

  • Safety Evaluation of Sunscreen Formulations Containing Titanium Dioxide and Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles in UVB Sunburned Skin: An In Vitro and In Vivo Study

    N. A. Monteiro-Riviere;K. Wiench;R. Landsiedel;S. Schulte

  • Assessing skin sensitization hazard in mice and men using non-animal test methods.

    Daniel Urbisch;Annette Mehling;Katharina Guth;Tzutzuy Ramirez

  • Acute and chronic effects of nano- and non-nano-scale TiO2 and ZnO particles on mobility and reproduction of the freshwater invertebrate Daphnia magna

    Karin Wiench;Wendel Wohlleben;Volker Hisgen;Kristin Radke

  • State-of-the-art of 3D cultures (organs-on-a-chip) in safety testing and pathophysiology.

    Natalie Alépée;Anthony Bahinski;Mardas Daneshian;Bart De Wever

  • Putting the parts together: combining in vitro methods to test for skin sensitizing potentials.

    Caroline Bauch;Susanne N. Kolle;Tzutzuy Ramirez;Tobias Eltze

  • A roadmap for the development of alternative (non-animal) methods for systemic toxicity testing.

    David A. Basketter;Harvey Clewell;Ian Kimber;Annamaria Rossi

  • On the Lifecycle of Nanocomposites: Comparing Released Fragments and their In‐Vivo Hazards from Three Release Mechanisms and Four Nanocomposites

    Wendel Wohlleben;Sandra Brill;Matthias W. Meier;Michael Mertler

  • Drug-metabolizing enzymes in the skin of man, rat, and pig.

    Franz Oesch;Eric Fabian;Barbara Oesch-Bartlomowicz;Christoph Werner

  • Toxico-/biokinetics of nanomaterials.

    Robert Landsiedel;Eric Fabian;Lan Ma-Hock;Wendel Wohlleben

  • Application of short-term inhalation studies to assess the inhalation toxicity of nanomaterials

    Robert Landsiedel;Lan Ma-Hock;Thomas Hofmann;Martin Wiemann

  • Integrated Testing Strategies (ITS) for safety assessment.

    Costanza Rovida;Nathalie Alépée;Anne M Api;David A Basketter

  • Concern-driven integrated approaches to nanomaterial testing and assessment - report of the NanoSafety Cluster Working Group 10

    Agnes G. Oomen;Peter M. J. Bos;Teresa F. Fernandes;Kerstin Hund-Rinke

  • Xenobiotic metabolism capacities of human skin in comparison with a 3D-epidermis model and keratinocyte-based cell culture as in vitro alternatives for chemical testing: phase II enzymes.

    Christine Götz;Roland Pfeiffer;Julia Tigges;Karsten Ruwiedel

  • Grouping and Read-Across Approaches for Risk Assessment of Nanomaterials.

    Agnes G. Oomen;Eric A J Bleeker;Peter M J Bos;Fleur van Broekhuizen

  • Gene toxicity studies on titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanomaterials used for UV-protection in cosmetic formulations

    Robert Landsiedel;Lan Ma-Hock;Ben Van Ravenzwaay;Markus Schulz

  • Xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes in the skin of rat, mouse, pig, guinea pig, man, and in human skin models

    F. Oesch;E. Fabian;K. Guth;R. Landsiedel

  • An in vitro alveolar macrophage assay for predicting the short-term inhalation toxicity of nanomaterials

    Martin Wiemann;Antje Vennemann;Ursula G. Sauer;Karin Wiench

Frequent Co-Authors

Franz Oesch
Franz Oesch Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
David A. Basketter
David A. Basketter University of Bedfordshire
Hansruedi Glatt
Hansruedi Glatt Federal Institute for Risk Assessment
Janeck J. Scott-Fordsmand
Janeck J. Scott-Fordsmand Aarhus University
Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg
Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg Leiden University
Emanuela Corsini
Emanuela Corsini University of Milan
Thomas Hartung
Thomas Hartung Johns Hopkins University
Günter Oberdörster
Günter Oberdörster University of Rochester
Aldert H. Piersma
Aldert H. Piersma Centre for Health Protection
Susan Gibbs
Susan Gibbs Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to a variety of rewarding careers in healthcare, research, and administration. For those interested in patient care, there are flexible, accredited registered nurse online programs that allow you to start or advance your nursing career while studying remotely.

If nutrition and dietetics is your passion, consider the best online nutrition programs that focus on the science of healthy living and disease prevention. These programs can prepare you for roles in public health, education, or clinical nutrition.

Leadership opportunities in healthcare are also expanding. Aspiring healthcare managers may benefit from cahme accredited online mha programs, which emphasize healthcare administration, policy, and business skills essential for today’s medical environments.

For nurses aiming for top clinical or academic roles, there’s a pathway through msn to dnp online no clinicals

With the flexibility of online study, these options make it easier to achieve your academic and professional goals in Biology, Biochemistry, and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Robert Landsiedel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles