World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
71
Citations
16514
World Ranking
6715
National Ranking
3115

Thomas M. Lincoln publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas M. Lincoln sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 163 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Thomas M. Lincoln D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas M. Lincoln sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas M. Lincoln is affiliated with Baystate Medical Center in the United States and conducts research primarily in the field of Medicine. Their work covers several subfields including Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Geriatrics and Gerontology, General Health Professions, Emergency Medicine, and Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health.

Their research interests focus on key topics such as Opioid Use Disorder Treatment, Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes, Health Policy Implementation Science, HIV-related health complications and treatments, Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies, and HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions.

Thomas M. Lincoln has contributed to multiple publications with notable recent papers including:

  • Massachusetts Justice Community Opioid Innovation Network (MassJCOIN), 2021, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
  • Pain is Associated with Missed Clinic Visits Among HIV-Positive Women, 2024, UNC Libraries

Their frequent coauthors encompass a range of researchers who have collaborated on different studies, including Elizabeth Evans, Thomas J. Stopka, Ekaterina Pivovarova, Sean M. Murphy, and Faye S. Taxman.

The majority of Thomas M. Lincoln's research papers have been published in venues such as the Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment and UNC Libraries.

Best Publications

  • Intracellular cyclic GMP receptor proteins

    Thomas M. Lincoln;Trudy L. Cornwell

  • Regulation of Myosin Phosphatase by a Specific Interaction with cGMP- Dependent Protein Kinase Iα

    Howard K. Surks;Naoki Mochizuki;Yasuyo Kasai;Serban P. Georgescu

  • Invited review: cGMP-dependent protein kinase signaling mechanisms in smooth muscle: from the regulation of tone to gene expression.

    Thomas M. Lincoln;Nupur Dey;Hassan Sellak

  • Inhibition of smooth muscle cell growth by nitric oxide and activation of cAMP-dependent protein kinase by cGMP

    T. L. Cornwell;E. Arnold;N. J. Boerth;T. M. Lincoln

  • Studies on the properties and mode of action of the purified regulatory subunit of bovine heart adenosine 3':5'-monophosphate-dependent protein kinase.

    Corbin Jd;Sugden Ph;West L;Flockhart Da

  • Regulation of intracellular Ca2+ levels in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells: reduction of Ca2+ by atriopeptin and 8-bromo-cyclic GMP is mediated by cyclic GMP-dependent protein kinase

    T L Cornwell;T M Lincoln

  • cGMP-dependent protein kinase mediates the reduction of Ca2+ by cAMP in vascular smooth muscle cells

    T. M. Lincoln;T. L. Cornwell;A. E. Taylor

  • Compartmentalization of adenosine 3':5'-monophosphate and adenosine 3':5'-monophosphate-dependent protein kinase in heart tissue.

    J D Corbin;P H Sugden;T M Lincoln;S L Keely

  • Protein Kinase G Transmits the Cardioprotective Signal From Cytosol to Mitochondria

    Alexandre D.T. Costa;Keith D. Garlid;Ian C. West;Thomas M. Lincoln

  • Cyclic GMP and mechanisms of vasodilation

    Thomas M. Lincoln

  • Mechanism of platelet inhibition by nitric oxide: In vivo phosphorylation of thromboxane receptor by cyclic GMP-dependent protein kinase

    Guang-Rong Wang;Yan Zhu;Perry V. Halushka;Thomas M. Lincoln

  • Regulation of sarcoplasmic reticulum protein phosphorylation by localized cyclic GMP-dependent protein kinase in vascular smooth muscle cells

    Trudy L. Cornwell;Katherine B. Pryzwansky;Todd A. Wyatt;Thomas M. Lincoln;Thomas M. Lincoln

  • Phosphorylation of the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor by cyclic GMP-dependent protein kinase.

    P Komalavilas;T M Lincoln

  • Phosphorylation of the Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptor CYCLIC GMP-DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE MEDIATES cAMP AND cGMP DEPENDENT PHOSPHORYLATION IN THE INTACT RAT AORTA

    Padmini Komalavilas;Thomas M. Lincoln

  • Self-reported health and prior health behaviors of newly admitted correctional inmates.

    Thomas J. Conklin;Thomas Lincoln;Robert W. Tuthill

  • Pleiotropic regulation of vascular smooth muscle tone by cyclic GMP-dependent protein kinase.

    T M Lincoln;P Komalavilas;T L Cornwell

  • Characterization of a novel cGMP binding protein from rat lung.

    S H Francis;T M Lincoln;J D Corbin

  • Towards an understanding of the mechanism of action of cyclic AMP and cyclic GMP in smooth muscle relaxation.

    Thomas M. Lincoln;Trudy L. Cornwell

  • Phosphorylation of mammalian myosin light chain kinases by the catalytic subunit of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase and by cyclic GMP-dependent protein kinase

    M Nishikawa;P de Lanerolle;T M Lincoln;R S Adelstein

  • Cyclic GMP-dependent protein kinase regulates vascular smooth muscle cell phenotype.

    Nancy J. Boerth;Nupur B. Dey;Trudy L. Cornwell;Thomas M. Lincoln

Frequent Co-Authors

Jackie D. Corbin
Jackie D. Corbin Vanderbilt University
Frederick L. Altice
Frederick L. Altice Yale University
Joanne E. Murphy-Ullrich
Joanne E. Murphy-Ullrich University of Alabama at Birmingham
Timothy P. Flanigan
Timothy P. Flanigan Brown University
Michael J. Mulvany
Michael J. Mulvany Aarhus University
Jennifer S. Pollock
Jennifer S. Pollock University of Alabama at Birmingham
Jeffrey Draine
Jeffrey Draine Temple University
Sharron H. Francis
Sharron H. Francis Vanderbilt University
David S. Bredt
David S. Bredt Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Martin Theis
Martin Theis Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Biology and Biochemistry have a wide range of related online degrees and career pathways to consider. Online education offers flexibility, diverse course options, and access to specialized programs that fit evolving healthcare and life science fields.

For those drawn to medical imaging, online radiology programs provide a direct route to a vital healthcare specialty. These programs prepare graduates for certification and entry-level jobs in diagnostic imaging.

Nutrition enthusiasts may explore advanced dietetic masters programs, which are designed to open doors to clinical practice, food service management, or research careers.

Looking for an accessible entry point to healthcare? Accredited medical assistant programs offer online coursework with financial aid options, leading to administrative and clinical roles.

For medical assistants ready to advance, a medical assistant to lpn bridge program can accelerate the transition towards becoming a licensed practical nurse, expanding clinical responsibilities and salary potential.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas M. Lincoln

Trending Scientists