World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
49
Citations
60483
World Ranking
5730
National Ranking
218

Jörg Sander publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jörg Sander sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 109 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jörg Sander D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jörg Sander sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - ACM Distinguished Member

Overview

Jörg Sander is affiliated with the University of Alberta in Canada and has contributed extensively to research in computer science and engineering. Their work predominantly focuses on artificial intelligence, with particular attention to anomaly detection techniques and applications.

The scientist has a strong research presence in several interconnected fields and subfields. The main areas of study include:

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering

Within these broader categories, more specific subfields addressed in their work are:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Molecular Biology
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Epidemiology

The thematic concentration of Jörg Sander's research centers around:

  • Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Water Systems and Optimization
  • Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
  • Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research
  • Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
  • Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
  • Data Management and Algorithms

Jörg Sander has published in several key journals and conferences, demonstrating engagement with a mixture of data mining, knowledge discovery, and bioinformatics venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data
  • 2022 IEEE 38th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)
  • Briefings in Bioinformatics

Their recent papers illustrate a strong focus on outlier detection, evaluation methods, and computational approaches. Selected recent publications are:

  • Internal Evaluation of Unsupervised Outlier Detection, 2020, ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data
  • On the evaluation of outlier detection and one-class classification: a comparative study of algorithms, model selection, and ensembles, 2023, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
  • CORE-SG: Efficient Computation of Multiple MSTs for Density-Based Methods, 2022, 2022 IEEE 38th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)
  • Potential of dissimilarity measure-based computation of protein thermal stability data for determining protein interactions, 2023, Briefings in Bioinformatics
  • Efficient outlier detection in numerical and categorical data, 2025, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery

Collaborations have been an integral part of their research, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Ricardo J. G. B. Campello
  • Arthur Zimek
  • Henrique O. Marques
  • Murilo Coelho Naldi
  • Bob D. de Vos

In recognition of their contributions to the field, Jörg Sander was awarded the ACM Distinguished Member honor in 2015.

Best Publications

  • A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial Databases with Noise

    Martin Ester;Hans-Peter Kriegel;Jörg Sander;Xiaowei Xu

  • LOF: identifying density-based local outliers

    Markus M. Breunig;Hans-Peter Kriegel;Raymond T. Ng;Jörg Sander

  • OPTICS: ordering points to identify the clustering structure

    Mihael Ankerst;Markus M. Breunig;Hans-Peter Kriegel;Jörg Sander

  • DBSCAN Revisited, Revisited: Why and How You Should (Still) Use DBSCAN

    Erich Schubert;Jörg Sander;Martin Ester;Hans Peter Kriegel

  • Density-Based Clustering Based on Hierarchical Density Estimates

    Ricardo J. G. B. Campello;Davoud Moulavi;Joerg Sander

  • Density-Based Clustering in Spatial Databases: The Algorithm GDBSCAN and Its Applications

    Jörg Sander;Martin Ester;Hans-Peter Kriegel;Xiaowei Xu

  • A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters a density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise

    Martin Ester;Hans-Peter Kriegel;Jörg Sander;Xiaowei Xu

  • Density-based clustering

    Hans Peter Kriegel;Peer Kröger;Jörg Sander;Arthur Zimek

  • Hierarchical Density Estimates for Data Clustering, Visualization, and Outlier Detection

    Ricardo J. G. B. Campello;Davoud Moulavi;Arthur Zimek;Jörg Sander

  • On the evaluation of unsupervised outlier detection: measures, datasets, and an empirical study

    Guilherme O. Campos;Arthur Zimek;Jörg Sander;Ricardo J. Campello

  • Incremental Clustering for Mining in a Data Warehousing Environment

    Martin Ester;Hans-Peter Kriegel;Jörg Sander;Michael Wimmer

  • A distribution-based clustering algorithm for mining in large spatial databases

    Xiaowei Xu;M. Ester;H.-P. Kriegel;J. Sander

  • Spatial Data Mining: A Database Approach

    Martin Ester;Hans-Peter Kriegel;Jörg Sander

  • Knowledge Discovery in Databases - Techniken und Anwendungen

    Martin Ester;Jörg Sander

  • Ensembles for unsupervised outlier detection: challenges and research questions a position paper

    Arthur Zimek;Ricardo J.G.B. Campello;Jörg Sander

  • OPTICS-OF: Identifying Local Outliers

    Markus M. Breunig;Hans-Peter Kriegel;Raymond T. Ng;Jörg Sander

  • Density-based clustering validation

    Davoud Moulavi;Pablo A. Jaskowiak;Pablo A. Jaskowiak;Ricardo J.G.B. Campello;Arthur Zimek

  • Independent quantization: an index compression technique for high-dimensional data spaces

    S. Berchtold;C. Bohm;H.V. Jagadish;H.-P. Kriegel

  • Spatial Data Mining: Database Primitives, Algorithms and Efficient DBMS Support

    Martin Ester;Alexander Frommelt;Hans-Peter Kriegel;Jöorg Sander

  • Subsampling for efficient and effective unsupervised outlier detection ensembles

    Arthur Zimek;Matthew Gaudet;Ricardo J.G.B. Campello;Jörg Sander

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans-Peter Kriegel
Hans-Peter Kriegel Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Martin Ester
Martin Ester Simon Fraser University
Ricardo J. G. B. Campello
Ricardo J. G. B. Campello University of Southern Denmark
Arthur Zimek
Arthur Zimek University of Southern Denmark
Xiaowei Xu
Xiaowei Xu University of Arkansas at Little Rock
Raymond T. Ng
Raymond T. Ng University of British Columbia
Russell Greiner
Russell Greiner University of Alberta
Peer Kröger
Peer Kröger Kiel University
Mark Schmidt
Mark Schmidt University of British Columbia
Steven J.M. Jones
Steven J.M. Jones University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Computer Science in the USA opens diverse educational and career pathways, especially through online learning options. Many students begin with associates degrees online, offering a flexible, affordable way to build foundational skills before pursuing a bachelor’s degree.

If cost is a concern, exploring the most affordable online colleges can help you earn a degree without substantial student debt. Additionally, prospective students with lower academic records should not be discouraged; there are online colleges that accept 2.0 gpa, ensuring broader access to quality education.

Beyond Computer Science, related fields like environmental science have promising outcomes too. Exploring what careers are available can provide context for your decision—see what jobs can you get with an environmental science degree to learn about job options and growth in this rapidly evolving field.

By leveraging flexible programs and understanding career potential, students can design a personalized educational journey that fits both their budget and professional aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Jörg Sander

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles