World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 100 421 381 192 164 457 30742
Medicine 105 6842 6432 3610 3346 529 34334

Edward W. Hook publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Edward W. Hook between 1956 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Edward W. Hook published across 70 years, from 1956 to 2025, averaging 7.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2013. 9 of the 545 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1956 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2013. 1956: 1 publication 1957: 4 publications 1958: 1 publication 1959: 3 publications 1960: 1 publication 1961: 4 publications 1962: 8 publications 1963: 8 publications 1964: 2 publications 1965: 2 publications 1966: 4 publications 1967: 4 publications 1968: 1 publication 1969: 3 publications 1970: 5 publications 1971: 1 publication 1972: 1 publication 1973: 2 publications 1974: 2 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 4 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 7 publications 1987: 11 publications 1988: 8 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 12 publications 1991: 11 publications 1992: 12 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 14 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 14 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 19 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 20 publications 2002: 21 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 25 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 4 publications
1956 2025

545 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Edward W. Hook: publications per year, 1956 to 2025
Year Publications
1956 1
1957 4
1958 1
1959 3
1960 1
1961 4
1962 8
1963 8
1964 2
1965 2
1966 4
1967 4
1968 1
1969 3
1970 5
1971 1
1972 1
1973 2
1974 2
1975 3
1976 2
1977 3
1978 3
1979 0
1980 1
1981 1
1982 1
1983 4
1984 4
1985 6
1986 7
1987 11
1988 8
1989 7
1990 12
1991 11
1992 12
1993 2
1994 14
1995 9
1996 9
1997 14
1998 10
1999 19
2000 9
2001 20
2002 21
2003 11
2004 15
2005 25
2006 14
2007 7
2008 7
2009 8
2010 5
2011 9
2012 23
2013 26
2014 11
2015 25
2016 8
2017 17
2018 7
2019 10
2020 6
2021 11
2022 6
2023 5
2024 5
2025 4
Total 545
Download as CSV

Edward W. Hook publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward W. Hook sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 455–464 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 457 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25 457
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Edward W. Hook D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward W. Hook sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 100 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30 100
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1982 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Edward W. Hook is affiliated with the University of Alabama at Birmingham in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine and immunology and microbiology, contributing a total of 78 publications across these main fields. The scientist has significant engagement in subfields such as microbiology, physiology, public health, environmental and occupational health, general health professions, and general social sciences.

Their scholarly output includes work on the following main topics:

  • Reproductive tract infections research
  • Syphilis diagnosis and treatment
  • HIV, TB, and STIs epidemiology
  • HIV/AIDS oral health manifestations
  • Reproductive health and contraception
  • Adolescent sexual and reproductive health
  • Female genital mutilation/cutting issues

Frequently publishing in respected venues, Edward W. Hook has contributed notably to:

  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases
  • UNC Libraries
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • Value in Health
  • New England Journal of Medicine

They have collaborated extensively with several coauthors, including:

  • Arlene C. Seña
  • Lorenzo Giacani
  • Kimberly Workowski
  • Nicole A. P. Lieberman
  • Sheila A. Lukehart

Among notable recent papers authored by or coauthored with Edward W. Hook are:

  • "Gonococcal vaccines: Public health value and preferred product characteristics; report of a WHO global stakeholder consultation, January 2019" (2020, Vaccine)
  • "Treponema pallidum genome sequencing from six continents reveals variability in vaccine candidate genes and dominance of Nichols clade strains in Madagascar" (2021, PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases)
  • "Optimising treatments for sexually transmitted infections: surveillance, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, therapeutic strategies, and molecular resistance prediction" (2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases)
  • "Characteristics of Mycoplasma genitalium Urogenital Infections in a Diverse Patient Sample from the United States: Results from the Aptima Mycoplasma genitalium Evaluation Study (AMES)" (2020, Journal of Clinical Microbiology)
  • "Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic considerations for new and current therapeutic drugs for uncomplicated gonorrhoea-challenges and opportunities" (2020, Clinical Microbiology and Infection)

Edward W. Hook was awarded the fellowship of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1982.

Best Publications

  • Parental Monitoring: Association With Adolescents' Risk Behaviors

    Ralph J. DiClemente;Gina M. Wingood;Richard Crosby;Catlainn Sionean

  • Invasion of the central nervous system by Treponema pallidum: implications for diagnosis and treatment.

    Sheila A. Lukehart;Edward W. Hook;Sharon A. Baker-Zander;Ann C. Collier

  • Efficacy of an HIV Prevention Intervention for African American Adolescent Girls: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Ralph J. DiClemente;Gina M. Wingood;Kathy F. Harrington;Delia L. Lang

  • Gonorrhoea

    Unknown

  • Acquired syphilis in adults.

    Edward W. Hook;Christina M. Marra

  • Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection among Patients Attending Clinics for Sexually Transmitted Diseases

    T C Quinn;D Glasser;R O Cannon;D L Matuszak

  • Multicenter Evaluation of the BDProbeTec ET System for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Urine Specimens, Female Endocervical Swabs, and Male Urethral Swabs

    Barbara Van Der Pol;Dennis V. Ferrero;Linda Buck-Barrington;Edward Hook

  • Condom use to prevent incident STDs: the validity of self-reported condom use.

    Jonathan M. Zenilman;Carol S. Weisman;Anne M. Rompalo;Nancy Ellish

  • Epidemiology, clinical presentation and antibody response to primary infection with herpes simplex virus type 1 and type 2 in young women

    David I. Bernstein;Abbie R. Bellamy;Edward W. Hook;Myron J. Levin

  • Syphilis

    Unknown

  • Failure of intensive care unit support to influence mortality from pneumococcal bacteremia.

    Edward W. Hook;Christy A. Horton;Dennis R. Schaberg

  • Herpes Simplex Virus Infection as a Risk Factor for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection in Heterosexuals

    Edward W. Hook;Robert O. Cannon;Robert O. Cannon;Andre J. Nahmias;Andre J. Nahmias;Francis F. Lee;Francis F. Lee

  • Vaginal swabs are the specimens of choice when screening for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: results from a multicenter evaluation of the APTIMA assays for both infections.

    Julius Schachter;Max A. Chernesky;Dean E. Willis;Paul M. Fine

  • Epidemiologic and microbiologic correlates of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in sexual partnerships

    T.C. Quinn;C. Gaydos;M. Shepherd;L. Bobo

  • Performance of the APTIMA Combo 2 assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in female urine and endocervical swab specimens.

    C. A. Gaydos;T. C. Quinn;T. C. Quinn;D. Willis;A. Weissfeld

  • A Prospective Study of Exposure to Rap Music Videos and African American Female Adolescents’ Health

    Gina M. Wingood;Ralph J. DiClemente;Jay Michael Bernhardt;Kathy Harrington

  • Enterococcal endocarditis. An analysis of 38 patients observed at the New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center.

    Gerald L. Mandell;Donald Kaye;Matthew E. Levison;Edward W. Hook

  • Microbiologic Evaluation of Cutaneous Cellulitis in Adults

    Edward W. Hook;Thomas M. Hooton;Christy A. Horton;Marie B. Coyle

  • Performance of the Cepheid CT/NG Xpert Rapid PCR Test for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae

    Charlotte A. Gaydos;Barbara Van Der Pol;Mary Jett-Goheen;Mathilda Barnes

  • Partner type and condom use

    Unknown

  • Update to CDC's sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010

    Carlos del Rio;Geraldine Hall;King Holmes;Olusegun Soge

  • A randomized controlled trial to reduce HIV transmission risk behaviors and sexually transmitted diseases among women living with HIV: The WiLLOW Program.

    Gina M. Wingood;Ralph J. DiClemente;Isis Mikhail;Delia L. Lang

  • Update to CDC's sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2006

    C. Del Rio;G. Hall;E. W. Hook;K. K. Holmes

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas C. Quinn
Thomas C. Quinn Johns Hopkins University
M. Kim Oh
M. Kim Oh Boston College
Ralph J. DiClemente
Ralph J. DiClemente New York University
Gina M. Wingood
Gina M. Wingood Columbia University
David H. Martin
David H. Martin Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans
Susan L. Davies
Susan L. Davies University of Alabama at Birmingham
Richard A. Crosby
Richard A. Crosby University of Kentucky
Jonathan M. Zenilman
Jonathan M. Zenilman Johns Hopkins University
Jane R. Schwebke
Jane R. Schwebke University of Alabama at Birmingham
Julius Schachter
Julius Schachter University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring microbiology doesn't have to stop with traditional on-campus programs. Many students are now turning to medical degrees online to gain flexible and accredited education in life sciences, including specialized fields closely related to microbiology.

If you're considering public health as a complementary field, there are numerous best easiest MPH online programs to get into designed for busy students or working professionals. These programs often provide an accessible pathway to expanding your expertise beyond microbiology and into community health or epidemiology.

Career diversification is also worth your attention. For example, becoming a child life specialist combines healthcare knowledge and emotional support skills—a career path with a growing demand. Interested learners can learn more about “how much does a child life specialist make” to understand the financial outlook of this rewarding profession.

Accessibility to education is vital, and numerous programs cater to non-traditional students. For those with past challenges, there are college degrees for felons that offer credible pathways to careers in health and science, opening doors for a fresh start through online learning.

Best Scientists Citing Edward W. Hook

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles