World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
USA
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 85 275 232 124 106 356 23840

Gina M. Wingood publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gina M. Wingood between 1993 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gina M. Wingood published across 34 years, from 1993 to 2026, averaging 12.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2025. 36 of the 415 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2025. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 4 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 32 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 22 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 25 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 35 publications 2026: 1 publication
1993 2026

415 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gina M. Wingood: publications per year, 1993 to 2026
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 2
1996 1
1997 4
1998 8
1999 4
2000 9
2001 16
2002 32
2003 17
2004 9
2005 9
2006 8
2007 15
2008 19
2009 13
2010 18
2011 22
2012 12
2013 15
2014 17
2015 11
2016 12
2017 16
2018 12
2019 25
2020 12
2021 11
2022 9
2023 4
2024 16
2025 35
2026 1
Total 415
Download as CSV

Gina M. Wingood publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gina M. Wingood sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 354–363 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 356 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36 356
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Gina M. Wingood D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gina M. Wingood sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15 85
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in United States Leader Award

Overview

Gina M. Wingood is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States and has made significant contributions to research in the fields of medicine and health professions. Their work predominantly focuses on infectious diseases, general health professions, epidemiology, sociology and political science, and health.

The main research topics covered in their publications include HIV/AIDS research and interventions, adolescent sexual and reproductive health, HIV related to drug use and sexual risk, HIV-related health complications and treatments, LGBTQ health, identity, and policy, sex work and related issues, as well as food security and health in diverse populations.

Several recent papers authored by Gina M. Wingood illustrate the scope of their work. These include:

  • Resilience and HIV Treatment Outcomes Among Women Living with HIV in the United States: A Mixed-Methods Analysis (2020) published in AIDS Patient Care and STDs
  • Quality of care for Black and Latina women living with HIV in the U.S.: a qualitative study (2020) published in International Journal for Equity in Health
  • Examining the Relationships Between Experienced and Anticipated Stigma in Health Care Settings, Patient-Provider Race Concordance, and Trust in Providers Among Women Living with HIV (2021) published in AIDS Patient Care and STDs
  • Patient Health Literacy and Communication with Providers Among Women Living with HIV: A Mixed Methods Study (2021) published in AIDS and Behavior
  • Brief Report: Linking Depressive Symptoms to Viral Nonsuppression Among Women With HIV Through Adherence Self-Efficacy and ART Adherence (2020) published in JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes

They frequently collaborate with researchers such as Adaora A. Adimora, Deborah Konkle-Parker, Mardge H. Cohen, Tracey E. Wilson, and Sheri D. Weiser. The volume of these collaborations ranges from 19 to 31 coauthored works.

Wingood's publications are commonly found in venues oriented toward infectious diseases and behavioral science including UNC Libraries, AIDS and Behavior, AIDS Patient Care and STDs, Innovation in Aging, and JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes.

Best Publications

  • Application of the Theory of Gender and Power to Examine HIV-Related Exposures, Risk Factors, and Effective Interventions for Women

    Gina M. Wingood;Ralph J. DiClemente

  • Parental Monitoring: Association With Adolescents' Risk Behaviors

    Ralph J. DiClemente;Gina M. Wingood;Richard Crosby;Catlainn Sionean

  • The ADAPT-ITT model: a novel method of adapting evidence-based HIV Interventions.

    Gina M Wingood;Ralph J DiClemente

  • A randomized controlled trial of an HIV sexual risk-reduction intervention for young African-American women.

    Ralph J. DiClemente;Gina M. Wingood

  • Efficacy of an HIV Prevention Intervention for African American Adolescent Girls: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Ralph J. DiClemente;Gina M. Wingood;Kathy F. Harrington;Delia L. Lang

  • The effects of an abusive primary partner on the condom use and sexual negotiation practices of African-American women.

    Gina M. Wingood;Ralph J. DiClemente

  • Partner influences and gender-related factors associated with noncondom use among young adult African American women.

    Gina M. Wingood;Ralph J. DiClemente

  • Parent-adolescent communication and sexual risk behaviors among African American adolescent females.

    Ralph J. DiClemente;Gina M. Wingood;Gina M. Wingood;Richard Crosby;Richard Crosby;Brenda K. Cobb;Brenda K. Cobb

  • Religiosity and risky sexual behavior in African-American adolescent females

    Donna Hubbard McCree;Gina M Wingood;Ralph DiClemente;Susan Davies

  • A Prospective Study of Exposure to Rap Music Videos and African American Female Adolescents’ Health

    Gina M. Wingood;Ralph J. DiClemente;Jay Michael Bernhardt;Kathy Harrington

  • Adverse consequences of intimate partner abuse among women in non-urban domestic violence shelters

    Gina M Wingood;Ralph J DiClemente;Anita Raj

  • A prospective study of psychological distress and sexual risk behavior among black adolescent females.

    Ralph J. DiClemente;Gina M. Wingood;Richard A. Crosby;Catlainn Sionean

  • Dating Violence and the Sexual Health of Black Adolescent Females

    Gina M. Wingood;Ralph J. DiClemente;Donna Hubbard McCree;Kathy Harrington

  • Cohort Profile: The Women's Interagency HIV Study (WIHS).

    Adaora A. Adimora;Catalina Ramirez;Lorie Benning;Ruth M. Greenblatt

  • A randomized controlled trial to reduce HIV transmission risk behaviors and sexually transmitted diseases among women living with HIV: The WiLLOW Program.

    Gina M. Wingood;Ralph J. DiClemente;Isis Mikhail;Delia L. Lang

  • Psychosocial Predictors of HIV-Associated Sexual Behaviors and the Efficacy of Prevention Interventions in Adolescents at-Risk for HIV Infection: What Works and What Doesn’t Work?

    Ralph J. DiClemente;Colleen P. Crittenden;Eve Rose;Jessica M. Sales

  • Understanding racial HIV/STI disparities in black and white men who have sex with men: a multilevel approach.

    Patrick S Sullivan;John Peterson;Eli S Rosenberg;Colleen Kelley

  • Explaining racial disparities in HIV incidence in black and white men who have sex with men in Atlanta, GA: a prospective observational cohort study.

    Patrick S. Sullivan;Eli S. Rosenberg;Travis H. Sanchez;Colleen F. Kelley

  • Child sexual abuse, HIV sexual risk, and gender relations of African-American women

    Gina M. Wingood;Ralph J. DiClemente

  • HIV sexual risk reduction interventions for women: a review.

    Gina M. Wingood;Ralph J. DiClemente

Frequent Co-Authors

Ralph J. DiClemente
Ralph J. DiClemente New York University
Richard A. Crosby
Richard A. Crosby University of Kentucky
Jessica M. Sales
Jessica M. Sales Emory University
Laura F. Salazar
Laura F. Salazar Georgia State University
Susan L. Davies
Susan L. Davies University of Alabama at Birmingham
Edward W. Hook
Edward W. Hook University of Alabama at Birmingham
Adaora A. Adimora
Adaora A. Adimora University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Hannah L.F. Cooper
Hannah L.F. Cooper Emory University
M. Kim Oh
M. Kim Oh Boston College
Phyllis C. Tien
Phyllis C. Tien University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens the door to a diverse range of online degree options and career pathways in the USA. Prospective students can choose from programs designed for different career goals and timelines.

Those interested in psychology and clinical practice may consider online psych d programs, which prepare students for advanced roles in counseling and mental health. If you want to accelerate your career as a marriage and family therapist, there are accelerated mft programs online available for faster completion.

For those seeking flexibility and affordability, pursuing an online master degree in psychology can be a strategic choice. These programs offer a strong academic foundation and open doors to various professional roles in education, business, and social services.

Alternatively, experienced educators and leaders may be interested in earning one of the edd degrees through fast-track, online options. These programs are ideal for those aiming to advance in educational leadership or administration. Each pathway offers unique benefits, providing flexibility for busy professionals and students worldwide.

Best Scientists Citing Gina M. Wingood

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles