World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Hannah L.F. Cooper

Hannah L.F. Cooper

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 49 2990 2742 1444 1305 191 8207

Hannah L.F. Cooper publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hannah L.F. Cooper between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hannah L.F. Cooper published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 9.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2025. 44 of the 266 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2025. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 23 publications
1999 2025

266 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hannah L.F. Cooper: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 3
2005 4
2006 2
2007 4
2008 6
2009 6
2010 3
2011 7
2012 10
2013 6
2014 16
2015 17
2016 21
2017 19
2018 10
2019 21
2020 19
2021 14
2022 15
2023 18
2024 21
2025 23
Total 266
Download as CSV

Hannah L.F. Cooper publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hannah L.F. Cooper sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 184–193 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 191 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319 191
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Hannah L.F. Cooper D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hannah L.F. Cooper sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186 49
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Hannah L.F. Cooper is affiliated with Emory University in the United States and has a research portfolio concentrated in Medicine, with a strong focus on Epidemiology and Public Health. Their scholarly work explores topics related to opioid use, HIV, and substance abuse treatment within rural and urban contexts.

Their research spans several interconnected topics, including:

  • HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Health Policy Implementation Science

Their most frequent co-authors include:

  • April M. Young
  • Umedjon Ibragimov
  • Ryan P. Westergaard
  • Judith Feinberg
  • P. Todd Korthuis

Major venues where Hannah L.F. Cooper has published include:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Harm Reduction Journal
  • International Journal of Drug Policy
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Among selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Cooper are:

  • "Buprenorphine dispensing in an epicenter of the U.S. opioid epidemic: A case study of the rural risk environment in Appalachian Kentucky", 2020, International Journal of Drug Policy
  • "Association of Methamphetamine and Opioid Use With Nonfatal Overdose in Rural Communities", 2022, JAMA Network Open
  • "The Rural Opioid Initiative Consortium description: providing evidence to Understand the Fourth Wave of the Opioid Crisis", 2022, Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
  • "When Prescribing Isn't Enough - Pharmacy-Level Barriers to Buprenorphine Access", 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Factors that influence enrollment in syringe services programs in rural areas: a qualitative study among program clients in Appalachian Kentucky", 2021, Harm Reduction Journal

The subfields of Cooper's research reflect a diverse interest in the epidemiological patterns and public health implications of drug use and infectious diseases, including:

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • General Health Professions
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Sociology and Political Science

Best Publications

  • The impact of a police drug crackdown on drug injectors' ability to practice harm reduction: a qualitative study.

    Hannah Cooper;Lisa Moore;Sofia Gruskin;Nancy Krieger

  • War on Drugs Policing and Police Brutality.

    Hannah L F Cooper

  • Understanding racial HIV/STI disparities in black and white men who have sex with men: a multilevel approach.

    Patrick S Sullivan;John Peterson;Eli S Rosenberg;Colleen Kelley

  • Explaining racial disparities in HIV incidence in black and white men who have sex with men in Atlanta, GA: a prospective observational cohort study.

    Patrick S. Sullivan;Eli S. Rosenberg;Travis H. Sanchez;Colleen F. Kelley

  • A Review of Qualitative Data Analysis Practices in Health Education and Health Behavior Research.

    Ilana G. Raskind;Rachel C. Shelton;Dawn L. Comeau;Hannah L. F. Cooper

  • Association between an Internet-Based Measure of Area Racism and Black Mortality

    David H. Chae;Sean Clouston;Mark L. Hatzenbuehler;Michael R. Kramer

  • Relationships of deterrence and law enforcement to drug-related harms among drug injectors in US metropolitan areas.

    Samuel R. Friedman;Hannah L.F. Cooper;Hannah L.F. Cooper;Barbara Tempalski;Maria Keem

  • Characterizing Perceived Police Violence: Implications for Public Health

    Hannah Cooper;Lisa Moore;Sofia Gruskin;Nancy Krieger

  • Structural and social contexts of HIV risk Among African Americans.

    Samuel R. Friedman;Hannah L. F. Cooper;Andrew H. Osborne

  • The intersectional risk environment of people who use drugs.

    Alexandra B. Collins;Jade Boyd;Hannah L.F. Cooper;Ryan McNeil

  • Estimating numbers of injecting drug users in metropolitan areas for structural analyses of community vulnerability and for assessing relative degrees of service provision for injecting drug users.

    Samuel R. Friedman;Barbara Tempalski;Hannah Cooper;Theresa Perlis

  • Estimates of injecting drug users at the national and local level in developing and transitional countries, and gender and age distribution

    C Aceijas;S R Friedman;H L F Cooper;L Wiessing

  • Nationwide Increase in the Number of Hospitalizations for Illicit Injection Drug Use-Related Infective Endocarditis

    Hannah L. F. Cooper;Joanne E. Brady;Daniel Ciccarone;Barbara Tempalski

  • Understanding and defining sanitation insecurity: women’s gendered experiences of urination, defecation and menstruation in rural Odisha, India

    Bethany A. Caruso;Thomas F. Clasen;Craig Hadley;Kathryn M. Yount

  • Trends in the population prevalence of people who inject drugs in US metropolitan areas 1992-2007.

    Barbara Tempalski;Enrique R. Pouget;Charles M. Cleland;Charles M. Cleland;Joanne E. Brady

  • Estimating the Prevalence of Injection Drug Users in the U.S. and in Large U.S. Metropolitan Areas from 1992 to 2002

    Joanne E. Brady;Samuel R. Friedman;Samuel R. Friedman;Hannah L. F. Cooper;Peter L. Flom

  • Area racism and birth outcomes among Blacks in the United States.

    David H. Chae;Sean Clouston;Connor D. Martz;Mark L. Hatzenbuehler

  • NIMBY localism and national inequitable exclusion alliances: The case of syringe exchange programs in the United States.

    Barbara Tempalski;Risa Friedman;Marie Keem;Hannah Cooper

  • Metropolitan isolation segregation and Black-White disparities in very preterm birth: a test of mediating pathways and variance explained.

    Michael S Kramer;Hannah L F Cooper;Carolyn D Drews-Botsch;Lance A Waller

  • Buprenorphine dispensing in an epicenter of the U.S. opioid epidemic: A case study of the rural risk environment in Appalachian Kentucky

    Hannah Lf Cooper;David H. Cloud;Patricia R. Freeman;Monica Fadanelli

  • Condom use among young women: modeling the theory of gender and power.

    Lara DePadilla;Michael Windle;Gina Wingood;Hannah Cooper

Frequent Co-Authors

Samuel R. Friedman
Samuel R. Friedman National Development and Research Institutes
Barbara Tempalski
Barbara Tempalski National Development and Research Institutes
Don C. Des Jarlais
Don C. Des Jarlais New York University
Gina M. Wingood
Gina M. Wingood Columbia University
Holly Hagan
Holly Hagan New York University
Adaora A. Adimora
Adaora A. Adimora University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Michael R. Kramer
Michael R. Kramer Emory University
Ron Stall
Ron Stall University of Pittsburgh
Carlos del Rio
Carlos del Rio Emory University
Susan Tross
Susan Tross Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The Social Sciences and Humanities field offers a wide range of online degrees that open doors to rewarding careers. For those interested in counseling, many prospective students look for cacrep schools to ensure their education meets industry standards and leads to licensure. For a specialized approach, affordable online mft programs can prepare graduates for meaningful roles supporting couples and families.

Psychology remains a popular pathway, and there are increasing options for those seeking an affordable online psychology degree. This degree can lead to positions in research, human resources, or community outreach. For students focused on social change, msw programs offer accessible training for future social workers who want to make a direct impact on people's lives.

Each of these academic paths offers flexibility and affordability, making it possible for students across the globe to access quality education and embark on careers dedicated to understanding and helping others.

Best Scientists Citing Hannah L.F. Cooper

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles