World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 96 1837 1657 125 115 665 31099

Franz Oesch publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Franz Oesch between 1967 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Franz Oesch published across 56 years, from 1967 to 2022, averaging 12.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 1990. 7 of the 688 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1967 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 1990. 1967: 1 publication 1968: 0 publications 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 4 publications 1972: 6 publications 1973: 10 publications 1974: 8 publications 1975: 5 publications 1976: 10 publications 1977: 9 publications 1978: 8 publications 1979: 19 publications 1980: 29 publications 1981: 22 publications 1982: 24 publications 1983: 22 publications 1984: 12 publications 1985: 27 publications 1986: 28 publications 1987: 31 publications 1988: 30 publications 1989: 22 publications 1990: 32 publications 1991: 20 publications 1992: 29 publications 1993: 17 publications 1994: 27 publications 1995: 30 publications 1996: 27 publications 1997: 19 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 17 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 2 publications
1967 2022

688 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Franz Oesch: publications per year, 1967 to 2022
Year Publications
1967 1
1968 0
1969 1
1970 0
1971 4
1972 6
1973 10
1974 8
1975 5
1976 10
1977 9
1978 8
1979 19
1980 29
1981 22
1982 24
1983 22
1984 12
1985 27
1986 28
1987 31
1988 30
1989 22
1990 32
1991 20
1992 29
1993 17
1994 27
1995 30
1996 27
1997 19
1998 8
1999 17
2000 9
2001 12
2002 12
2003 17
2004 13
2005 13
2006 4
2007 4
2008 4
2009 10
2010 3
2011 5
2012 4
2013 2
2014 3
2015 0
2016 3
2017 2
2018 2
2019 2
2020 3
2021 5
2022 2
Total 688
Download as CSV

Franz Oesch publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Franz Oesch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 657–666 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 665 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34 665
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Franz Oesch D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Franz Oesch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 96–97 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153 96
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1999 - German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina - Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina – Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Physiology and Pharmacology/Toxicology
  • 1992 - Member of Academia Europaea
  • 1982 - Robert Koch Prize

Overview

Franz Oesch is affiliated with Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a concentration on pharmacology, cancer research, and molecular biology. Additional areas of study include health, toxicology and mutagenesis, and organic chemistry.

The scientist's work addresses multiple topics, notably carcinogens and genotoxicity assessment, pharmacological effects of natural compounds, pesticide exposure and toxicity, cytokine signaling pathways and interactions, NF-κB signaling pathways, pharmacological effects of medicinal plants, and bone metabolism and diseases.

Oesch has contributed to various publication venues, frequently appearing in:

  • Archives of Toxicology
  • Medicinal Research Reviews
  • Seminars in Cancer Biology
  • Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology
  • Phytomedicine

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Oesch include:

  • "Toxicity as prime selection criterion among SARS-active herbal medications," published in 2021 in Phytomedicine
  • "N-vinyl compounds: studies on metabolism, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity," published in 2021 in Archives of Toxicology
  • "Genotoxicity testing of nanomaterials," published in 2022 in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology (co-authored with Robert Landsiedel)
  • "The immunosuppressive activity of artemisinin-type drugs towards inflammatory and autoimmune diseases," 2021, Medicinal Research Reviews (co-authored with Thomas Efferth)
  • "Anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer activities of frankincense: Targets, treatments and toxicities," 2020, Seminars in Cancer Biology (co-authored with Thomas Efferth)

Frequent co-authors of Oesch include Robert Landsiedel, Eric Fabian, Thomas Efferth, Naveed Honarvar, and Franz Berger.

Oesch has been recognized with several awards, including membership in the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina in 1999 for work in physiology and pharmacology/toxicology, membership in Academia Europaea since 1992, and the Robert Koch Prize awarded in 1982.

Best Publications

  • Mammalian epoxide hydrases: inducible enzymes catalysing the inactivation of carcinogenic and cytotoxic metabolites derived from aromatic and olefinic compounds.

    Franz Oesch

  • A radiometric assay for hepatic epoxide hydrase activity with [7-3H] styrene oxide☆

    F. Oesch;D.M. Jerina;J. Daly

  • A multiplex polymerase chain reaction protocol for the simultaneous analysis of the glutathione S-transferase GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms.

    Michael Arand;Roland Mühlbauer;Jan Hengstler;Elke Jäger

  • Genotoxicity investigations on nanomaterials: Methods, preparation and characterization of test material, potential artifacts and limitations—Many questions, some answers

    Robert Landsiedel;Maike Diana Kapp;Markus Schulz;Karin Wiench

  • Immunoselection in vivo : independent loss of MHC class I and melanocyte differentiation antigen expression in metastatic melanoma

    Elke Jäger;Mark Ringhoffer;Michael Altmannsberger;Michael Arand

  • Inverse relationship of melanocyte differentiation antigen expression in melanoma tissues and CD8+ cytotoxic-T-cell responses: evidence for immunoselection of antigen-loss variants in vivo.

    Elke Jäger;Mark Ringhoffer;Julia Karbach;Michael Arand

  • Enhancement of cytotoxicity of artemisinins toward cancer cells by ferrous iron.

    Thomas Efferth;Achille Benakis;Marta R. Romero;Maja Tomicic

  • Adverse outcome pathways: opportunities, limitations and open questions.

    Marcel Leist;Ahmed Ghallab;Ahmed Ghallab;Rabea Graepel;Rosemarie Marchan

  • Granulocyte-macrophage-colony-stimulating factor enhances immune responses to melanoma-associated peptides in vivo

    Elke Jäger;Mark Ringhoffer;Hans Peter Dienes;Michael Arand

  • Cryopreserved primary hepatocytes as a constantly available in vitro model for the evaluation of human and animal drug metabolism and enzyme induction.

    Jan G. Hengstler;D. Utesch;P. Steinberg;K. L. Platt

  • Occupational exposure to heavy metals: DNA damage induction and DNA repair inhibition prove co-exposures to cadmium, cobalt and lead as more dangerous than hitherto expected

    Jan G. Hengstler;Ulrich Bolm-Audorff;Andreas Faldum;Kai Janssen

  • New hepatocyte in vitro systems for drug metabolism: metabolic capacity and recommendations for application in basic research and drug development, standard operation procedures.

    Rolf Gebhardt;Jan G Hengstler;Dieter Müller;Reinhild Glöckner

  • Polymorphisms of N-acetyltransferases, glutathione S-transferases, microsomal epoxide hydrolase and sulfotransferases: influence on cancer susceptibility.

    J. G. Hengstler;M. Arand;M. E. Herrero;F. Oesch

  • Of mice and models: improved animal models for biomedical research.

    Ernesto Bockamp;Marko Maringer;Christian Spangenberg;Stephan Fees

  • Structure of Aspergillus niger epoxide hydrolase at 1.8 A resolution: implications for the structure and function of the mammalian microsomal class of epoxide hydrolases.

    J Zou;B M Hallberg;T Bergfors;F Oesch

  • Drug-metabolizing enzymes in the skin of man, rat, and pig.

    Franz Oesch;Eric Fabian;Barbara Oesch-Bartlomowicz;Christoph Werner

  • Sequence similarity of mammalian epoxide hydrolases to the bacterial haloalkane dehalogenase and other related proteins Implication for the potential catalytic mechanism of enzymatic epoxide hydrolysis

    Michael Arand;David F. Grant;Jeffrey K. Beetham;Thomas Friedberg

  • Conversion of naphthalene to trans-naphthalene dihydrodiol: Evidence for the presence of a coupled aryl monooxygenase-epoxide hydrase system in hepatic microsomes

    F. Oesch;J. Daly

  • Aryl hydrocarbon receptor activation by cAMP vs. dioxin : Divergent signaling pathways

    Barbara Oesch-Bartlomowicz;Andrea Huelster;Oliver Wiss;Patricia Antoniou-Lipfert

  • Purification and specificity of a human microsomal epoxide hydratase.

    Franz Oesch

Frequent Co-Authors

Hansruedi Glatt
Hansruedi Glatt Federal Institute for Risk Assessment
Michael Arand
Michael Arand University of Zurich
Jan G. Hengstler
Jan G. Hengstler TU Dortmund University
Albrecht Seidel
Albrecht Seidel Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Robert Landsiedel
Robert Landsiedel BASF (United States)
Larry W. Robertson
Larry W. Robertson University of Iowa
David H. Phillips
David H. Phillips King's College London
John W. Daly
John W. Daly National Institutes of Health
Sherry L. Mowbray
Sherry L. Mowbray Uppsala University
Maria de Lourdes Bastos
Maria de Lourdes Bastos University of Porto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Biology and Biochemistry, there are several flexible online degree options that open doors to dynamic careers in health, science, and wellness. An online bachelor's degree in exercise science is ideal for those passionate about human physiology, sports performance, and rehabilitation. This pathway prepares graduates for roles in fitness training, health promotion, and clinical exercise environments.

Another related field is kinesiology, where pursuing an online kinesiology degree provides a solid foundation for careers in physical therapy, coaching, and wellness consulting. These programs are designed for students who wish to blend biological sciences with the study of movement and physical health.

For advanced degree holders seeking to transition quickly into nursing specialties, consider the shortest post master's pmhnp online programs. These certificates focus on psychiatric mental health and can fast-track your pathway to become a mental health nurse practitioner. Similarly, the fastest post master's fnp certificate allows nurses to rapidly qualify as family nurse practitioners. These accelerated options cater to professionals aiming to expand their expertise and career opportunities in the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Franz Oesch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles