World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 127 2811 2623 287 276 619 66924

Rod S Taylor publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rod S Taylor between 1964 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rod S Taylor published across 62 years, from 1964 to 2025, averaging 11.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 69 publications in 2015. 54 of the 709 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1964 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 69. Peak 69 publications in 2015. 1964: 1 publication 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 8 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 17 publications 2005: 19 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 32 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 24 publications 2014: 41 publications 2015: 69 publications 2016: 58 publications 2017: 34 publications 2018: 40 publications 2019: 52 publications 2020: 40 publications 2021: 53 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 48 publications
1964 2025

709 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rod S Taylor: publications per year, 1964 to 2025
Year Publications
1964 1
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 1
1985 1
1986 1
1987 1
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 2
1995 0
1996 0
1997 3
1998 2
1999 1
2000 8
2001 8
2002 9
2003 14
2004 17
2005 19
2006 16
2007 20
2008 13
2009 21
2010 19
2011 32
2012 24
2013 24
2014 41
2015 69
2016 58
2017 34
2018 40
2019 52
2020 40
2021 53
2022 6
2023 3
2024 6
2025 48
Total 709
Download as CSV

Rod S Taylor publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rod S Taylor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 601–620 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 619 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396 619
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Rod S Taylor D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rod S Taylor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 126–127 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 127 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252 127
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Rod S Taylor is affiliated with the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom. Their research is predominantly situated within the field of Medicine, with a specific emphasis on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Additional areas of study include Economics and Econometrics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Otorhinolaryngology, and Statistics, Probability, and Uncertainty.

The main topics addressed in their work cover a range of medical and health-related issues:

  • Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Delphi Technique in Research
  • Ethics in Clinical Research

Rod S Taylor's recent publications include the following titles:

  • CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials, 2025, BMJ
  • SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials, 2025, BMJ
  • Enhanced neoepitope-specific immunity following neoadjuvant PD-L1 and TGF-β blockade in HPV-unrelated head and neck cancer, 2022, Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomized trials, 2025, Nature Medicine
  • CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials, 2025, BMJ

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Rod S Taylor include:

  • Sally Hopewell
  • Asbjørn Hróbjartsson
  • David Moher
  • Kenneth F. Schulz
  • Jesse A. Berlin

The main publication venues for their work highlight a consistent presence in several journals:

  • BMJ
  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • Nature Medicine

Best Publications

  • Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

    Rod S Taylor;Allan Brown;Shah Ebrahim;Judith Jolliffe

  • Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease

    Lindsey Anderson;David R. Thompson;Neil Oldridge;Ann Dorthe Zwisler

  • Exercise-based Rehabilitation for Coronary Heart Disease

    J A Jolliffe;K Rees;R S Taylor;D Thompson

  • Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation for Coronary Heart Disease: Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Lindsey Anderson;Neil Oldridge;David R. Thompson;Ann Dorthe Zwisler

  • 2020 ESC Guidelines on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease.

    Antonio Pelliccia;Sanjay Sharma;Sabiha Gati;Maria Bäck

  • Spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management for neuropathic pain: a multicentre randomised controlled trial in patients with failed back surgery syndrome.

    Krishna Kumar;Rod S. Taylor;Line Jacques;Sam Eldabe

  • Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy to prevent relapse in recurrent depression.

    Willem Kuyken;Sarah Byford;Rod S. Taylor;Ed Watkins

  • How does mindfulness-based cognitive therapy work?

    Willem Kuyken;Ed Watkins;Emily Holden;Kat White

  • The effectiveness of exercise interventions for people with Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

    Victoria A. Goodwin;Suzanne H. Richards;Rod S. Taylor;Adrian H. Taylor

  • How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research)

    Trisha Greenhalgh;Rod Taylor

  • Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Prevention of Depressive Relapse: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis From Randomized Trials

    Willem Kuyken;Fiona C. Warren;Rod S. Taylor;Ben Whalley

  • EFNS guidelines on neurostimulation therapy for neuropathic pain

    G. Cruccu;T. Z. Aziz;L. Garcia-Larrea;P. Hansson

  • The effects of spinal cord stimulation in neuropathic pain are sustained: a 24-month follow-up of the prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial of the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation.

    Krishna Kumar;Rod S Taylor;Line Jacques;Sam Eldabe

  • Home‐based versus centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation

    Lindsey Anderson;Georgina A Sharp;Rebecca J Norton;Hasnain Dalal

  • Tacrolimus versus ciclosporin as primary immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients: meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomised trial data

    Angela C Webster;Rebecca C Woodroffe;Rod S Taylor;Jeremy R Chapman

  • Exercise based rehabilitation for heart failure

    Ed J. Davies;Tiffany Moxham;Karen Rees;Sally Singh

  • Methadone and buprenorphine for the management of opioid dependence: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

    M Connock;A Juarez-Garcia;S Jowett;E Frew

  • National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). HTA rhyme and reason

    Rod Taylor

  • Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease (Review)

    Balraj S. Heran;Jenny M.H. Chen;Shah Ebrahim;Tiffany Moxham

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicky Britten
Nicky Britten University of Exeter
David Richards
David Richards University of Bristol
Charles Abraham
Charles Abraham University of Exeter
Willem Kuyken
Willem Kuyken University of Oxford
Edward R. Watkins
Edward R. Watkins University of Exeter
Susan Michie
Susan Michie University College London
Tim Dalgleish
Tim Dalgleish University of Cambridge
Charlie Foster
Charlie Foster University of Bristol
Shah Ebrahim
Shah Ebrahim London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Michael Ussher
Michael Ussher St George's, University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in healthcare but want to explore alternative routes to becoming a physician, online education offers a wide range of possibilities. Seeking an accelerated healthcare administration degree can fast-track your entry into health leadership roles, without the extended commitment of medical school.

For registered nurses looking to advance their careers, specialized bridge programs like adn to np provide a seamless pathway to becoming a nurse practitioner. These flexible programs are designed for working professionals aiming to broaden their clinical skills and impact.

Students who are passionate about wellness and preventive care might consider online nutrition degrees. This field opens doors to roles in health education, community outreach, and corporate wellness.

Finally, those aspiring to lead health organizations may benefit from nationally recognized online mha programs cahme accredited. These programs provide rigorous training in health policy, management, and systems improvement—all in a flexible online format.

Each of these online pathways offers valuable alternatives for building a rewarding career in healthcare, whether your interests are clinical, administrative, or community-focused.

Best Scientists Citing Rod S Taylor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles