World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 47 3331 3065 1608 1457 210 11985

Gillian H. Roehrig publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gillian H. Roehrig between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gillian H. Roehrig published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2018. 17 of the 233 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2018. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 9 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 6 publications
1994 2025

233 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gillian H. Roehrig: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 2
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 1
2000 0
2001 3
2002 2
2003 4
2004 3
2005 4
2006 1
2007 9
2008 2
2009 5
2010 8
2011 15
2012 10
2013 7
2014 15
2015 13
2016 10
2017 13
2018 21
2019 12
2020 14
2021 20
2022 12
2023 9
2024 11
2025 6
Total 233
Download as CSV

Gillian H. Roehrig publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gillian H. Roehrig sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 204–213 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 210 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285 210
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Gillian H. Roehrig D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gillian H. Roehrig sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251 47
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Gillian H. Roehrig is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research primarily spans the social sciences, with specific emphasis on education, developmental and educational psychology, and related interdisciplinary fields. Roehrig's work engages broadly with topics concerning science education and pedagogy, career development and diversity, teacher education and leadership studies, as well as innovative teaching and learning methods.

The scientist has made significant contributions to the field through multiple peer-reviewed publications. Notable papers include:

  • "Beyond the basics: a detailed conceptual framework of integrated STEM" (2021) published in Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research
  • "Understanding coherence and integration in integrated STEM curriculum" (2021) published in International Journal of STEM Education
  • "Who succeeds in STEM? Elementary girls' attitudes and beliefs about self and STEM" (2020) published in School Science and Mathematics
  • "Science and mathematics teacher communities of practice: social influences on discipline-based identity and self-efficacy beliefs" (2021) published in International Journal of STEM Education
  • "Identity evolution of STEM teachers in Egyptian STEM schools in a time of transition: a case study" (2020) published in International Journal of STEM Education

Roehrig's collaboration network is marked by frequent coauthorship with several researchers including Jeanna R. Wieselmann, Emily A. Dare, Elizabeth Ring-Whalen, and Samuel J. Polizzi. These professional partnerships have contributed to a diverse output focusing on integrated STEM education, teacher identity, and social influences in educational settings.

Publication venues commonly featuring Roehrig's work include:

  • Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research
  • International Journal of STEM Education
  • 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings
  • Education Sciences
  • CBE-Life Sciences Education

The core research interests are reflected in the main topics Roehrig explores:

  • Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Career Development and Diversity
  • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Biomedical and Engineering Education

Roehrig's scholarly work intersects with multiple subfields, notably education, developmental and educational psychology, safety research, experimental and cognitive psychology, and computer science applications. This interdisciplinary approach supports the exploration of complex educational dynamics and the promotion of integration across STEM disciplines.

Best Publications

  • Considerations for Teaching Integrated STEM Education

    Micah Stohlmann;Tamara J. Moore;Gillian H. Roehrig

  • STEM Integration: Teacher Perceptions and Practice.

    Hui-Hui Wang;Tamara J. Moore;Gillian H. Roehrig;Mi Sun Park

  • Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education

    Tamara J. Moore;Micah S. Stohlmann;Hui Hui Wang;Kristina M. Tank

  • Is Adding the E Enough? Investigating the Impact of K-12 Engineering Standards on the Implementation of STEM Integration

    Gillian H. Roehrig;Tamara J. Moore;Hui-Hui Wang;Mi Sun Park

  • Capturing Science Teachers’ Epistemological Beliefs: The Development of the Teacher Beliefs Interview

    Julie A. Luft;Gillian H. Roehrig

  • Constraints experienced by beginning secondary science teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lessons

    Gillian H. Roehrig;Julie A. Luft

  • Teacher and school characteristics and their influence on curriculum implementation

    Gillian H. Roehrig;Rebecca A. Kruse;Anne Kern

  • Teaching Science with Technology: Case Studies of Science Teachers' Development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK)

    S. Selcen Guzey;Gillian H. Roehrig

  • Contrasting landscapes: A comparison of the impact of different induction programs on beginning secondary science teachers' practices, beliefs, and experiences

    Julie A. Luft;Gillian H. Roehrig;Nancy C. Patterson

  • Growing a Garden without Water: Graduate Teaching Assistants in Introductory Science Laboratories at a Doctoral/Research University

    Julie A. Luft;Josepha P. Kurdziel;Gillian H. Roehrig;Jessica Turner

  • The Role of Teachers' Beliefs and Knowledge in the Adoption of a Reform-Based Curriculum

    Gillian H. Roehrig;Rebecca A. Kruse

  • Assessing Beginning Secondary Science Teachers' PCK: Pilot Year Results

    Eunmi Lee;Michelle N. Brown;Julie A. Luft;Gillian H. Roehrig

  • Integrated stem education

    Lynn A. Bryan;Tamara J. Moore;Carla C. Johnson;Gillian H. Roehrig

  • Infusing Neuroscience Into Teacher Professional Development

    Janet M. Dubinsky;Gillian Roehrig;Sashank Varma

  • Teaching science with technology: Case studies of science teachers’ development of technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge

    S. Selcen Guzey;Gillian H. Roehrig

  • The Evolution of Teacher Conceptions of STEM Education Throughout an Intensive Professional Development Experience

    Elizabeth A. Ring;Emily A. Dare;Elizabeth A. Crotty;Gillian H. Roehrig

  • Understanding Science Teachers' Implementations of Integrated STEM Curricular Units through a Phenomenological Multiple Case Study.

    Emily A. Dare;Joshua A. Ellis;Gillian H. Roehrig

  • A High‐Quality Professional Development for Teachers of Grades 3–6 for Implementing Engineering into Classrooms

    S. Selcen Guzey;Kristina Tank;Hui-Hui Wang;Gillian Roehrig

  • Graduate Teaching Assistants and Inquiry-Based Instruction: Implications for Graduate Teaching Assistant Training

    Gillian H. Roehrig;Julie A. Luft;Josepha P. Kurdziel;Jessica A. Turner

  • Does One Size Fit All? The Induction Experience of Beginning Science Teachers from Different Teacher-Preparation Programs.

    Gillian H. Roehrig;Julie A. Luft

Frequent Co-Authors

Julie A. Luft
Julie A. Luft University of Georgia
Efi Foufoula-Georgiou
Efi Foufoula-Georgiou University of California, Irvine
Ludwik Adamowicz
Ludwik Adamowicz University of Arizona
Mark Windschitl
Mark Windschitl University of Washington
Jacques C. Finlay
Jacques C. Finlay University of Minnesota
Richard Lesh
Richard Lesh Indiana University
Martin Valcke
Martin Valcke Ghent University
Peter Richard Wilcock
Peter Richard Wilcock Utah State University
Patrick Belmont
Patrick Belmont Utah State University
Jeffrey Liew
Jeffrey Liew Texas A&M University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in advancing your studies in Social Sciences and Humanities? There are several flexible degree options that can help you fast-track your career. Online programs allow you to earn advanced credentials while balancing other commitments, making education more accessible than ever before.

If you’re aiming for a career in psychology, you might consider the cheapest psyd programs that offer clinical training and prepare you for licensure. For those focused on therapy and counseling, accelerated online mft programs let you earn a marriage and family therapy degree at a faster pace.

Not ready for a doctorate? Explore psychology masters programs that provide critical skills for roles in research, counseling, or education. Professionals interested in leadership or academia might benefit from online edd programs, which focus on educational leadership.

Each of these online pathways opens new doors in education, mental health services, research, and beyond—helping you shape a fulfilling and impactful career in the Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Gillian H. Roehrig

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles