World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter Van Petegem

Peter Van Petegem

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
54
Citations
9577
World Ranking
2187
National Ranking
20

Peter Van Petegem publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Van Petegem sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 364 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Peter Van Petegem D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Van Petegem sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Van Petegem is affiliated with the University of Antwerp in Belgium and has contributed extensively to research in social sciences, particularly focusing on education and psychology. Their work spans multiple subfields, including education, management, monitoring, policy and law, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and developmental and educational psychology.

The primary areas of research for Van Petegem include environmental education and sustainability, sustainability in higher education, educational environments and student outcomes, educational assessment and improvement, education achievement and giftedness, innovative teaching and learning methods, and motivation and self-concept in sports.

Van Petegem has published in various academic venues with a notable frequency in:

  • Environmental Education Research
  • Studies In Educational Evaluation
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • The Journal of Environmental Education
  • Education Sciences

Recent publications highlight Van Petegem's engagement with sustainable development and environmental education through empirical studies and measurement tools. Some of their recent papers include:

  • "Redefining action competence: The case of sustainable development" (2020), The Journal of Environmental Education
  • "Animal Welfare Attitudes: Effects of Gender and Diet in University Samples from 22 Countries" (2021), Animals
  • "Promoting Environmental Citizenship in Education: The Potential of the Sustainability Consciousness Questionnaire to Measure Impact of Interventions" (2021), Sustainability
  • "Development and validation of an instrument for measuring action competence in sustainable development within early adolescents: the action competence in sustainable development questionnaire (ACiSD-Q)" (2021), Environmental Education Research
  • "Actions for sustainable development through young students' eyes" (2020), Environmental Education Research

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Van Petegem include Jelle Boeve-de Pauw, Sven De Mæyer, Wanda Sass, Jan Vanhoof, and Vincent Donche. These collaborations indicate an active research network and joint contributions particularly in topics related to sustainability and educational research.

Best Publications

  • Integrated STEM Education: A Systematic Review of Instructional Practices in Secondary Education

    Lieve Thibaut;Stijn Ceuppens;Haydée De Loof;Jolien De Meester

  • The impact of instructional development in higher education: the state-of-the-art of the research

    Ann Stes;Mariska Min-Leliveld;David Gijbels;Peter Van Petegem

  • Instructional development for teachers in higher education: impact on teaching approach

    Ann Stes;Liesje Coertjens;Peter M.C. Van Petegem

  • The Effect of Flemish Eco‐Schools on Student Environmental Knowledge, Attitudes, and Affect

    Jelle Boeve-de Pauw;Peter Van Petegem

  • ICT in teacher education in an emerging developing country: Vietnam's baseline situation at the start of 'The Year of ICT'

    Jef Peeraer;Peter Van Petegem

  • NEW ASSESSMENT MODES WITHIN PROJECT-BASED EDUCATION - THE STAKEHOLDERS

    Veerle Van den Bergh;Dimitri Mortelmans;Pieter Spooren;Peter Van Petegem

  • The Effectiveness of a Faculty Training Programme: Long‐term and institutional impact

    Ann Stes;Mieke Clement;Peter Van Petegem

  • The environmental worldview of children: a cross-cultural perspective

    Peter Van Petegem;An Blieck

  • Academics in the field of Education for Sustainable Development: Their conceptions of sustainable development

    Eleni Sinakou;Jelle Boeve-de Pauw;Maarten Goossens;Peter Van Petegem

  • How may teacher evaluation have an impact on professional development? A multilevel analysis

    Eva Delvaux;Jan Vanhoof;Melissa Tuytens;Eva Vekeman

  • Redefining action competence : the case of sustainable development

    Wanda Sass;Jelle Boeve-de Pauw;Daniel Olsson;Niklas Gericke

  • Student-focused approaches to teaching in relation to context and teacher characteristics

    Ann Stes;David Gijbels;Peter Van Petegem

  • DO SCHOOLS MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN THEIR STUDENTS’ ENVIRONMENTAL ATTITUDES AND AWARENESS? EVIDENCE FROM PISA 2006

    Liesje Coertjens;Jelle Boeve-de Pauw;Sven De Maeyer;Peter Van Petegem

  • Differential use of learning strategies in first-year higher education: The impact of personality, academic motivation, and teaching strategies

    Vincent Donche;Sven De Maeyer;Sven De Maeyer;Liesje Coertjens;Tine Van Daal

  • Designing Powerful Learning Environments in Education for Sustainable Development: A Conceptual Framework

    Eleni Sinakou;Vincent Donche;Jelle Boeve-de Pauw;Peter Van Petegem

  • A cross-national perspective on youth environmental attitudes

    Jelle Boeve-de Pauw;Peter Van Petegem

  • Students’ engagement in different STEM learning environments: integrated STEM education as promising practice?

    Annemie Struyf;Haydée De Loof;Jelle Boeve-de Pauw;Peter Van Petegem

  • Teachers' decision-making : data based or intuition driven?

    Kristin Vanlommel;Roos Van Gasse;Jan Vanhoof;Peter Van Petegem

  • Students' Persistence and Academic Success in a First-Year Professional Bachelor Program: The Influence of Students' Learning Strategies and Academic Motivation

    Gert Vanthournout;David Gijbels;Liesje Coertjens;Vincent Donche

  • Matching Internal and External Evaluation in an Era of Accountability and School Development: Lessons from a Flemish Perspective.

    Jan Vanhoof;Peter Van Petegem

  • Educational Leadership and Pupil Achievement: The Choice of a Valid Conceptual Model to Test Effects in School Effectiveness Research.

    Sven De Maeyer;Rita Rymenans;Peter Van Petegem;Huub van den Bergh

  • The development of learning patterns of student teachers: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study

    Vincent Donche;Peter Van Petegem

Frequent Co-Authors

David Gijbels
David Gijbels University of Antwerp
Piet Van den Bossche
Piet Van den Bossche University of Antwerp
Wim Dehaene
Wim Dehaene KU Leuven
Martin Valcke
Martin Valcke Ghent University
Katrien Struyven
Katrien Struyven Hasselt University
Geert Devos
Geert Devos Ghent University
Jan Van Damme
Jan Van Damme KU Leuven
Rupert Wegerif
Rupert Wegerif University of Cambridge
Gert Rijlaarsdam
Gert Rijlaarsdam University of Amsterdam
Huub van den Bergh
Huub van den Bergh Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens the door to a wide range of meaningful online degree options and career pathways. For students interested in mental health and human behavior, various online psychology degrees offer an affordable start, paving the way for roles in counseling, education, or research.

Those looking to have a direct impact in social work can consider msw schools, which prepare graduates to help individuals, families, and communities through diverse social services. For advanced clinical roles, pursuing psyd psychology programs can lead to a career as a licensed psychologist, with a focus on hands-on practice over research.

If you're interested in family and relationship therapy, accelerated mft programs offer a fast-track route toward becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist. Each of these pathways can be pursued online, making them accessible and flexible for diverse students ready to shape the future of society and human well-being.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Van Petegem

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles