World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
12318
World Ranking
7791
National Ranking
3371

Andrew M. Childs publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew M. Childs sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 113 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Andrew M. Childs D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew M. Childs sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew M. Childs is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on computer science, with a significant concentration in artificial intelligence, atomic and molecular physics and optics, computational theory and mathematics, computer networks and communications, and hardware and architecture.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Quantum and electron transport phenomena
  • Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
  • Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
  • Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Quantum many-body systems

Andrew M. Childs has published extensively across several venues. Their frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Quantum
  • Physical Review Research
  • PRX Quantum
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)

Some of their recent papers are:

  • "Efficient quantum algorithm for dissipative nonlinear differential equations," 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "High-precision quantum algorithms for partial differential equations," 2021, Quantum
  • "Tweezer-programmable 2D quantum walks in a Hubbard-regime lattice," 2022, Science
  • "Signaling and scrambling with strongly long-range interactions," 2020, Physical Review A
  • "Quantum algorithms and lower bounds for convex optimization," 2020, Quantum

Collaboration plays a notable role in their research. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Alexey V. Gorshkov (21 collaborations)
  • Dhruv Devulapalli (11 collaborations)
  • Tongyang Li (10 collaborations)
  • Eddie Schoute (8 collaborations)
  • Daochen Wang (6 collaborations)

Best Publications

  • Universal Computation by Quantum Walk

    Andrew M. Childs

  • Exponential algorithmic speedup by a quantum walk

    Andrew M. Childs;Richard Cleve;Enrico Deotto;Edward Farhi

  • Spatial search by quantum walk

    Andrew M. Childs;Jeffrey Goldstone

  • Simulating Hamiltonian Dynamics with a Truncated Taylor Series

    Dominic W. Berry;Andrew M. Childs;Richard Cleve;Richard Cleve;Robin Kothari;Robin Kothari

  • Robustness of adiabatic quantum computation

    Andrew M. Childs;Edward Farhi;John Preskill

  • Toward the first quantum simulation with quantum speedup.

    Andrew M. Childs;Dmitri Maslov;Yun Seong Nam;Neil J. Ross;Neil J. Ross

  • Universal Computation by Multiparticle Quantum Walk

    Andrew M. Childs;David Gosset;Zak Webb

  • On the Relationship Between Continuous- and Discrete-Time Quantum Walk

    Andrew M. Childs

  • Hamiltonian Simulation with Nearly Optimal Dependence on all Parameters

    Dominic W. Berry;Andrew M. Childs;Robin Kothari

  • Quantum algorithms for algebraic problems

    Andrew M. Childs;Wim van Dam

  • Exponential improvement in precision for simulating sparse Hamiltonians

    Dominic W. Berry;Andrew M. Childs;Andrew M. Childs;Richard Cleve;Richard Cleve;Robin Kothari;Robin Kothari

  • Quantum algorithm for systems of linear equations with exponentially improved dependence on precision

    Andrew M. Childs;Robin Kothari;Rolando D. Somma

  • Exponential algorithmic speedup by quantum walk

    Andrew M. Childs;Richard Cleve;Enrico Deotto;Edward Farhi

  • Constructing elliptic curve isogenies in quantum subexponential time

    Andrew M. Childs;David Jao;Vladimir Soukharev

  • Quantum Algorithm for Systems of Linear Equations with Exponentially Improved Dependence on Precision

    Andrew M. Childs;Robin Kothari;Rolando D. Somma

  • Hamiltonian simulation using linear combinations of unitary operations

    Andrew M. Childs;Nathan Wiebe

  • Hamiltonian Simulation Using Linear Combinations of Unitary Operations

    Nathan Wiebe;Andrew Childs

  • Secure assisted quantum computation

    Andrew M. Childs

  • Any AND-OR Formula of Size $N$ Can Be Evaluated in Time $N^{1/2+o(1)}$ on a Quantum Computer

    A. Ambainis;A. M. Childs;B. W. Reichardt;R. Špalek

  • Automated optimization of large quantum circuits with continuous parameters

    Yunseong Nam;Neil J. Ross;Yuan Su;Andrew M. Childs

  • Efficient quantum algorithm for dissipative nonlinear differential equations.

    Jin-Peng Liu;Herman Øie Kolden;Herman Øie Kolden;Hari K. Krovi;Nuno F. Loureiro

  • Quantum information and precision measurement

    Andrew M. Childs;John Preskill;Joseph Renes

  • ANY AND-OR FORMULA OF SIZE N CAN BE EVALUATED IN TIME N1/2+o(1) ON A QUANTUM COMPUTER

    A. Ambainis;A. M. Childs;B. W. Reichardt;R. Spalek

  • Theory of Trotter Error with Commutator Scaling

    Andrew M. Childs;Yuan Su;Minh C. Tran;Nathan Wiebe;Nathan Wiebe;Nathan Wiebe

  • Black-box hamiltonian simulation and unitary implementation

    Dominic W. Berry;Andrew M. Childs

Frequent Co-Authors

Debbie Leung
Debbie Leung University of Waterloo
Nathan Wiebe
Nathan Wiebe University of Toronto
Richard Cleve
Richard Cleve University of Waterloo
Andris Ambainis
Andris Ambainis University of Latvia
Dmitri Maslov
Dmitri Maslov IBM (United States)
Guifre Vidal
Guifre Vidal Google (United States)
John Preskill
John Preskill California Institute of Technology
Frank Verstraete
Frank Verstraete Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options can be a smart move for those interested in computer science and related fields. Many universities now offer most in demand masters degrees fully online, helping graduates qualify for top roles in technology, analytics, and cybersecurity.

For students who need a quicker or more affordable path, consider 1 year associate degree programs online. These programs allow you to gain essential technical skills and often serve as a stepping stone to a bachelor's program or entry-level IT employment.

Affordability is often a concern, but many schools offer affordable online degree programs that minimize debt while still offering recognized credentials. Some online colleges are also welcoming to non-traditional students by offering flexible admission standards.

If your academic record has gaps, it’s worth exploring online graduate programs that accept 2.0 gpa. These institutions provide a second chance for students who want to pursue advanced studies and career growth despite a lower undergraduate GPA.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew M. Childs

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles