World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
13632
World Ranking
9315
National Ranking
87

C. Harry Hui publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. Harry Hui sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 105 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

C. Harry Hui D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. Harry Hui sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

C. Harry Hui is a researcher affiliated with the University of Hong Kong in China, who has contributed extensively in the field of psychology, with a particular focus on clinical, experimental and cognitive, social, and applied psychology. Their work also covers education-related studies. The researcher's publication portfolio spans various specialized topics including sleep and related disorders, psychological well-being and life satisfaction, optimism, hope, and well-being, as well as developmental aspects in early childhood and child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development. Additional themes in their research include forgiveness and related behaviors, alongside conflict management and negotiation.

Their recent publications demonstrate a diverse range of research interests and empirical studies. Notable papers include:

  • A longitudinal investigation of the bidirectional relationship of sleep quality with emotional stability and social cynicism in a large community sample, 2021, Sleep Health
  • Improving an old way to measure moderation effect in standardized units, 2022, Health Psychology
  • Temporal relationships of forgivingness with personality and moods: A three-wave panel study, 2021, Personality and Individual Differences
  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of group-based trajectory modeling of sleep duration across age groups and in relation to health outcomes, 2025, SLEEP
  • Social-emotional competence as the promotive and protective factor for Chinese school teachers' well-being, 2025, Social and Emotional Learning Research Practice and Policy

The frequent coauthors collaborating with C. Harry Hui include Esther Yuet Ying Lau, Shu Fai Cheung, Sing-Hang Cheung, Jasmine Lam, and FU Linyun. These partnerships illustrate a sustained scholarly cooperation mainly within the domains of psychology and social-emotional research.

The venues in which they publish reflect a focus on social-emotional learning, health psychology, sleep studies, personality research, and educational policy. The most common publication venues are:

  • Social and Emotional Learning Research Practice and Policy
  • Sleep Health
  • Health Psychology
  • Personality and Individual Differences
  • SLEEP

C. Harry Hui's main field of study is psychology, encompassing 15 publications distributed mainly across clinical psychology (5 publications), experimental and cognitive psychology (4 publications), social psychology (4 publications), applied psychology (2 publications), and education (2 publications). Their work addresses multi-disciplinary intersections that link psychological theory with practical outcomes in health and education settings.

Best Publications

  • Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism.

    Harry C. Triandis;Christopher McCusker;C. Harry Hui

  • Measurement in Cross-Cultural Psychology A Review and Comparison of Strategies

    C. Harry Hui;Harry C. Triandis

  • Individualism-Collectivism: A Study of Cross-Cultural Researchers

    C. Harry Hui;Harry C. Triandis

  • Measurement of individualism-collectivism

    C.Harry Hui

  • Individualism-Collectivism

    Unknown

  • The measurement of the etic aspects of individualism and collectivism across cultures

    Harry C. Triandis;Robert Bontempo;Hector Betancourt;Michael Bond

  • Effects of Culture and Response Format on Extreme Response Style

    C. Harry Hui;Harry C. Triandis

  • Cross-cultural training across the individualism-collectivism divide

    Harry C. Triandis;Richard Brislin;C.Harry Hui

  • Cultural differences in reward allocation: Is collectivism the explanation?

    C. Harry Hui;Harry C. Triandis;Candice Yee

  • The interplay between sleep and mood in predicting academic functioning, physical health and psychological health: A longitudinal study

    Mark Lawrence Wong;Esther Yuet Ying Lau;Jacky Ho Yin Wan;Shu Fai Cheung

  • The Shortened lndividualism-Collectivism Scale: Its Relationship to Demographic and Work-Related Variables

    C.Harry Hui;Candice Yee

  • Individualism-Collectivism and Pyschological Needs Their Relationships in Two Cultures

    C. Harry Hui;Marcelo J. Villareal

  • A Method for Determining Cultural, Demographic, and Personal Constructs:

    Harry C. Triandis;Robert Bontempo;Kwok Leung;C. Harry Hui

  • The effects of service climate and the effective leadership behaviour of supervisors on frontline employee service quality : a multi-level analysis

    C. Harry Hui;Warren C. K. Chiu;Philip L. H. Yu;Kevin Cheng

  • Deciding on equity or parity: a test of situational, cultural, and individual factors

    Chao C. Chen;James R. Meindl;Harry Hui

  • The Relationship between Individualism—Collectivism and Job Satisfaction

    C. Harry Hui;Candice Yee;Karen L. Eastman

  • The Instability of Response Sets

    C. Harry Hui;Harry C. Triandis

  • Multistrategy Approach to Cross-Cultural Research The Case of Locus of Control

    C. Harry Hui;Harry C. Triandis

  • A study of resiliency among Chinese health care workers: Capacity to cope with workplace stress

    Oi Ling Siu;C. Harry Hui;David R. Phillips;Lin Lin

  • Psychological changes during faith exit: A three-year prospective study.

    C. Harry Hui;Sing-Hang Cheung;Jasmine Lam;Esther Yuet Ying Lau

  • The impact of psychological collectivism and workgroup atmosphere on Chinese employees' job satisfaction

    C. Harry Hui;Candice Yee

  • Psychological ownership and organizational optimism amid China's corporate transformation: effects of an employee ownership scheme and a management-dominated board

    Warren C.K. Chiu;C. Harry Hui;Gina W.F Lai

Frequent Co-Authors

Harry C. Triandis
Harry C. Triandis University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Kim-Pong Tam
Kim-Pong Tam Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Kwok Leung
Kwok Leung Chinese University of Hong Kong
Wayne F. Cascio
Wayne F. Cascio University of Colorado Denver
Michael Bond
Michael Bond Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Oi Ling Siu
Oi Ling Siu Lingnan University
David Phillips
David Phillips University of Melbourne
Gerardo Marin
Gerardo Marin University of San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens doors to numerous online programs and rewarding career pathways in counseling, behavioral health, and human services. One of the most prominent roles for psychology graduates is becoming a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC), a position that requires specific educational backgrounds and licensure.

Requirements for becoming an LPC can vary significantly from state to state. For example, the Louisiana licensed professional counselor requirements mandate a graduate degree, supervised clinical experience, and a passing exam score. Similarly, the Maine lpc licensure requirements highlight the importance of an accredited master’s degree and direct clinical experience.

Other states, like Maryland and Massachusetts, have their own guidelines. The Maryland lpc licensure requirements emphasize coursework in counseling and ethics, while the Massachusetts lpc licensure requirements specify the need for comprehensive supervised practice.

Prospective students should research the licensure process in their target state and choose an online psychology degree that aligns with their career and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing C. Harry Hui

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles