World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
5833
World Ranking
9492
National Ranking
89

Kim-Pong Tam publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kim-Pong Tam sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 99 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Kim-Pong Tam D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kim-Pong Tam sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kim-Pong Tam is affiliated with the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology in China. Their research primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences, Psychology, and Environmental Science, with significant contributions in Sociology and Political Science, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, as well as Social, Applied, and Clinical Psychology.

The scientist's work focuses mainly on topics related to Environmental Education and Sustainability, Climate Change Communication and Perception, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Cultural Differences and Values, Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research, Social and Intergroup Psychology, and Misinformation and Its Impacts.

Kim-Pong Tam has published extensively, with frequent appearances in prominent venues such as the Journal of Environmental Psychology, Asian Journal Of Social Psychology, Virtual Reality, Frontiers in Psychology, and Current Opinion in Psychology.

Recent papers authored by Kim-Pong Tam include:

  • Towards cross-cultural environmental psychology: A state-of-the-art review and recommendations (2020, Journal of Environmental Psychology)
  • Climate change anxiety in China, India, Japan, and the United States (2023, Journal of Environmental Psychology)
  • Research on climate change in social psychology publications: A systematic review (2021, Asian Journal Of Social Psychology)
  • Gratitude to nature: Presenting a theory of its conceptualization, measurement, and effects on pro-environmental behavior (2021, Journal of Environmental Psychology)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Kim-Pong Tam are:

  • Hoi-Wing Chan
  • Angela K.-Y. Leung
  • Susan Clayton
  • Ying-yi Hong
  • Laurence L. Delina

Best Publications

  • Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: Similarities and differences

    Kim-Pong Tam

  • Culture as common sense: perceived consensus versus personal beliefs as mechanisms of cultural influence.

    Xi Zou;Kim-Pong Tam;Michael W. Morris;Sau-lai Lee

  • Saving Mr. Nature: Anthropomorphism enhances connectedness to and protectiveness toward nature

    Kim Pong Tam;Sau Lai Lee;Melody Manchi Chao

  • Dispositional empathy with nature

    Kim-Pong Tam

  • Environmental concern has a weaker association with pro-environmental behavior in some societies than others: A cross-cultural psychology perspective

    Unknown

  • Perceived cultural importance and actual self-importance of values in cultural identification.

    Ching Wan;Chi-yue Chiu;Kim Pong Tam;Sau-lai Lee

  • Generalized trust narrows the gap between environmental concern and pro-environmental behavior: Multilevel evidence

    Kim Pong Tam;Hoi Wing Chan

  • Towards cross-cultural environmental psychology: A state-of-the-art review and recommendations

    Kim-Pong Tam;Taciano L. Milfont

  • Exclusionary reactions to foreign cultures: Effects of simultaneous exposure to cultures in globalized space

    Carlos J. Torelli;Chi Yue Chiu;Kim pong Tam;Al K.C. Au

  • Measuring Cultures through Intersubjective Cultural Norms Implications for Predicting Relative Identification With Two or More Cultures

    Ching Wan;Chi-Yue Chiu;Siqing Peng;Kim Pong Tam

  • Being environmentally responsible: Cosmopolitan orientation predicts pro-environmental behaviors

    Angela K. Y. Leung Leung;Kelly Koh;Kim-Pong Tam

  • Nature in virtual reality improves mood and reduces stress: evidence from young adults and senior citizens.

    Sarah Hian May Chan;Lin Qiu;Gianluca Esposito;Ky Phong Mai

  • Climate change anxiety in China, India, Japan, and the United States

    Unknown

  • Intersubjective Model of Value Transmission Parents Using Perceived Norms as Reference When Socializing Children

    Kim Pong Tam;Sau Lai Lee;Young Hoon Kim;Yanmei Li

  • Age differences in personal values: Universal or cultural specific?

    Helene H. Fung;Yuan Wan Ho;Rui Zhang;Xin Zhang

  • Unraveling the link between narcissism and psychological health: New evidence from coping flexibility

    Henry Kin Shing Ng;Ray Yu-Hin Cheung;Kim-Pong Tam

  • Cross-National Variation of Gender Differences in Environmental Concern: Testing the Sociocultural Hindrance Hypothesis:

    Hoi-Wing Chan;Vivien Pong;Kim-Pong Tam

  • Research on climate change in social psychology publications: A systematic review

    Kim-Pong Tam;Angela K.-y. Leung;Susan Clayton

  • What Values do Parents Want to Socialize in Their Children? The Role of Perceived Normative Values

    Kim-Pong Tam;Sau-Lai Lee

  • Terror management among Chinese: Worldview defence and intergroup bias in resource allocation.

    Kim Pong Tam;Chi-Yue Chiu;Ivy Yee-Man Lau

  • Culture and Counterfactuals On the Importance of Life Domains

    Jing Chen;Jing Chen;Chi Yue Chiu;Chi Yue Chiu;Neal J. Roese;Kim Pong Tam

  • Attributionally more complex people show less punitiveness and racism

    Kim Pong Tam;Al K C Au;Angela Ka Yee Leung

  • Culture as Common Sense: Perceived Consensus vs. Personal Beliefs as Mechanisms of Cultural Influence

    Xi Zou;Kim-Pong Tam;Michael Morris;Sau-lai Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

Chi-Yue Chiu
Chi-Yue Chiu Chinese University of Hong Kong
Angela K.-Y. Leung
Angela K.-Y. Leung Chinese University of Hong Kong
Taciano L. Milfont
Taciano L. Milfont University of Waikato
Huajian Cai
Huajian Cai University of Oklahoma
C. Harry Hui
C. Harry Hui University of Hong Kong
Michael W. Morris
Michael W. Morris Columbia University
Hugh P. Possingham
Hugh P. Possingham University of Queensland
Ying-yi Hong
Ying-yi Hong Chinese University of Hong Kong
Gianluca Esposito
Gianluca Esposito University of Trento
Susan Clayton
Susan Clayton College of Wooster

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When considering a psychology degree in the USA, it’s essential to explore various online options that suit your goals, budget, and schedule. Numerous universities are now offering flexible programs designed for all types of students, whether you’re looking to accelerate your studies, save on tuition, or enter the workforce faster.

For students prioritizing fast completion, accelerated online psychology programs in Wisconsin allow you to earn your degree more quickly and efficiently. Meanwhile, affordability is a key concern for many, and resources like affordable online psychology bachelor's programs in Colorado, affordable online psychology bachelor's programs in Florida, and affordable online psychology bachelor's programs in Georgia can help you find cost-effective options in different states.

An online psychology degree opens up diverse career pathways, such as counseling, social work, human resources, and research roles. With the flexibility of online learning and the variety of affordable, accredited programs available, pursuing a psychology degree has become more accessible than ever—helping you prepare for meaningful work in a growing field.

Best Scientists Citing Kim-Pong Tam

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles