World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 47 2494 2308 87 86 124 9897

Gérard Duc publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gérard Duc between 1981 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gérard Duc published across 40 years, from 1981 to 2020, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2010. 4 of the 130 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2010. 1981: 2 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 6 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 1 publication
1981 2020

130 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gérard Duc: publications per year, 1981 to 2020
Year Publications
1981 2
1982 1
1983 1
1984 6
1985 1
1986 2
1987 0
1988 1
1989 2
1990 4
1991 2
1992 2
1993 4
1994 2
1995 5
1996 0
1997 3
1998 0
1999 3
2000 2
2001 2
2002 4
2003 3
2004 3
2005 4
2006 6
2007 6
2008 3
2009 3
2010 9
2011 8
2012 2
2013 2
2014 6
2015 4
2016 6
2017 4
2018 8
2019 3
2020 1
Total 130
Download as CSV

Gérard Duc publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gérard Duc sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–125 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 124 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233 124
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Gérard Duc D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gérard Duc sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143 47
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • Genetics

His scientific interests lie mostly in Botany, Medicago truncatula, Symbiosis, Mutant and Vicia faba. The Botany study combines topics in areas such as Mycorrhiza and Cell biology. His Medicago truncatula research incorporates themes from Genetic analysis, Genome, Strain, Molecular genetics and Transformation.

His Symbiosis study deals with Nitrogen fixation intersecting with Rhizobium and Legume. His Mutant research integrates issues from Nod and Pisum. His research integrates issues of Genetic variability, Biotechnology and Amplified fragment length polymorphism, Genetic diversity in his study of Vicia faba.

His most cited work include:

  • A putative Ca2+ and calmodulin-dependent protein kinase required for bacterial and fungal symbioses. (622 citations)
  • Shoot control of root development and nodulation is mediated by a receptor-like kinase (466 citations)
  • Medicago truncatula, a model plant for studying the molecular genetics of the Rhizobium-legume symbiosis. (340 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Botany, Agronomy, Vicia faba, Medicago truncatula and Mutant. His Botany research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Symbiosis, Rhizobiaceae and Gene, Rhizobium. His work deals with themes such as Genetic variability and Horticulture, which intersect with Agronomy.

His Vicia faba study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Sterility, Molecular biology, Hybrid and Genotype. As a part of the same scientific family, Gérard Duc mostly works in the field of Medicago truncatula, focusing on Cell biology and, on occasion, Root nodule, Lotus japonicus and Rhizobia. His study in Mutant is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Nod and Mycorrhiza.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (38.54%)
  • Agronomy (23.96%)
  • Vicia faba (22.92%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2020)?

  • Agronomy (23.96%)
  • Vicia faba (22.92%)
  • Genetics (15.62%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Gérard Duc focuses on Agronomy, Vicia faba, Genetics, Molecular biology and Business. His Agronomy research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Rhizobium leguminosarum, Microbial inoculant and Microbial population biology. Gérard Duc has included themes like Glutathione, Gene and Synteny in his Vicia faba study.

Candidate gene, Genome-wide association study, Medicago, Chromosome and Genome are the core of his Genetics study. His Candidate gene research includes themes of Plant disease resistance, Genetic variability, Single-nucleotide polymorphism and Root rot. His Molecular biology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Dehydrogenase, Ingestion, Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency and Red blood cell.

Between 2015 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Why are grain-legumes rarely present in cropping systems despite their environmental and nutritional benefits? Analyzing lock-in in the French agrifood system (93 citations)
  • A SNP-based consensus genetic map for synteny-based trait targeting in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) (55 citations)
  • Co-inoculation of a pea core-collection with diverse Rhizobial strains shows competitiveness for nodulation and efficiency of nitrogen fixation are distinct traits in the interaction (23 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • Genetics

Gérard Duc mostly deals with Subsidy, Food systems, Agricultural economics, European union and Sustainable agriculture. Subsidy combines with fields such as Returns to scale, Agrochemical and Agroecology in his investigation.

Best Publications

  • A putative Ca2+ and calmodulin-dependent protein kinase required for bacterial and fungal symbioses.

    Julien Lévy;Cécile Bres;René Geurts;Boulos Chalhoub

  • Shoot control of root development and nodulation is mediated by a receptor-like kinase

    Lene Krusell;Lene H. Madsen;Shusei Sato;Grégoire Aubert

  • Nutritional value of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) seeds for feed and food

    Katell Crépon;Pascal Marget;Corinne Peyronnet;Benoit Carrouée

  • The Medicago truncatula SUNN gene encodes a CLV1-like leucine-rich repeat receptor kinase that regulates nodule number and root length.

    Elise Schnabel;Etienne-Pascal Journet;Fernanda de Carvalho-Niebel;Gérard Duc

  • Medicago truncatula, a model plant for studying the molecular genetics of the Rhizobium-legume symbiosis.

    David G. Barker;Sylvie Bianchi;François Blondon;Yvette Dattée

  • First report of non-mycorrhizal plant mutants (Myc−) obtained in pea (Pisum sativum L.) and fababean (Vicia faba L.)

    Gerard Duc;Alain Trouvelot;Vivienne Gianinazzi-Pearson;Silvio Gianinazzi

  • Faba bean (Vicia faba L.)

    G. Duc

  • Why are grain-legumes rarely present in cropping systems despite their environmental and nutritional benefits? Analyzing lock-in in the French agrifood system

    Marie-Benoit Magrini;Marc Anton;Célia Cholez;Guenaelle Corre-Hellou

  • Selection of nodulation and mycorrhizal mutants in the model plant Medicago truncatula (Gaertn.) after γ-ray mutagenesis

    Muriel Sagan;Dominique Morandi;Elisabeth Tarenghi;Gérard Duc

  • Diversity maintenance and use of Vicia faba L. genetic resources

    Gérard Duc;Shiying Bao;Michael Baum;Bob Redden

  • Mutagenesis of pea (Pisum sativum L.) and the isolation of mutants for nodulation and nitrogen fixation

    G. Duc;A. Messager

  • Developmental Genes Have Pleiotropic Effects on Plant Morphology and Source Capacity, Eventually Impacting on Seed Protein Content and Productivity in Pea

    Judith Burstin;Pascal Marget;Myriam Huart;Annie Moessner

  • Breeding Annual Grain Legumes for Sustainable Agriculture: New Methods to Approach Complex Traits and Target New Cultivar Ideotypes

    G. Duc;H. Agrama;S. Bao;Jens Berger

  • IPD3 controls the formation of nitrogen-fixing symbiosomes in pea and Medicago Spp.

    Evgenia Ovchinnikova;Etienne-Pascal Journet;Mireille Chabaud;Viviane Cosson

  • Differentiation of Symbiotic Cells and Endosymbionts in Medicago truncatula Nodulation Are Coupled to Two Transcriptome-Switches

    Nicolas Maunoury;Miguel Redondo-Nieto;Marie Bourcy;Willem Van de Velde

  • Grain legume seed filling in relation to nitrogen acquisition: A review and prospects with particular reference to pea

    Christophe Salon;Nathalie G. Munier-Jolain;Gérard Duc;Anne-Sophie Voisin

  • Genetic variability for feeding value of faba bean seeds (Vicia faba): Comparative chemical composition of isogenics involving zero-tannin and zero-vicine genes

    Unknown

  • The Clavata2 genes of pea and Lotus japonicus affect autoregulation of nodulation

    Lene Krusell;Naoto Sato;Izumi Fukuhara;Bjørn E. V. Koch

  • Genetic and Cellular Analysis of Resistance to Vesicular Arbuscular (VA) Mycorrhizal Fungi in Pea Mutants

    V. Gianinazzi-Pearson;S. Gianinazzi;J. P. Guillemin;A. Trouvelot

  • Adaptation of Medicago truncatula to nitrogen limitation is modulated via local and systemic nodule developmental responses

    Christian Jeudy;Sandrine Ruffel;Sandra Freixes;Pascal Tillard

  • A SNP-based consensus genetic map for synteny-based trait targeting in faba bean (Vicia faba L.)

    Anne Webb;Amanda Cottage;Thomas Wood;Khalil Khamassi

  • Local and Systemic Regulation of Plant Root System Architecture and Symbiotic Nodulation by a Receptor-Like Kinase

    Emeline Huault;Carole Laffont;Jiangqi Wen;Kirankumar S. Mysore

  • Pulses for Sustainability: Breaking Agriculture and Food Sectors Out of Lock-In

    Marie-Benoît Magrini;Marc Anton;Jean-Michel Chardigny;Gérard Duc

Frequent Co-Authors

Marie-Hélène Jeuffroy
Marie-Hélène Jeuffroy INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Judith Burstin
Judith Burstin INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Grégoire Aubert
Grégoire Aubert INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Frederick L. Stoddard
Frederick L. Stoddard University of Helsinki
Alain Baranger
Alain Baranger INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Marc Boutry
Marc Boutry Université Catholique de Louvain
Pascal Ratet
Pascal Ratet University of Paris-Saclay
Richard Thompson
Richard Thompson INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Marie-Laure Pilet-Nayel
Marie-Laure Pilet-Nayel Institute for Genetics, Environment and Plant Protection
Vivienne Gianinazzi-Pearson
Vivienne Gianinazzi-Pearson Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Gérard Duc

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles