World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
9039
World Ranking
6648
National Ranking
3609

Kevin M. King publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin M. King sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 141 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Kevin M. King D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin M. King sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kevin M. King is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of psychology, with a primary focus on mental health and behavioral research.

Their recent publications cover a variety of topics and have appeared in notable academic venues. Selected papers include:

  • "Why Are Self-Report and Behavioral Measures Weakly Correlated?" (2020) published in Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • "Best practices for addressing missing data through multiple imputation" (2023) published in Infant and Child Development
  • "Effectiveness of Task-Shifted Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Children Who Experienced Parental Death and Posttraumatic Stress in Kenya and Tanzania" (2020) published in JAMA Psychiatry
  • "The daily association between affect and alcohol use: A meta-analysis of individual participant data" (2023) published in Psychological Bulletin
  • "Interpreting Interaction Effects in Generalized Linear Models of Nonlinear Probabilities and Counts" (2021) published in Multivariate Behavioral Research

Kevin M. King's research spans several main fields of study, predominantly psychology. Their work focuses on the following subfields:

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Epidemiology
  • General Health Professions

Key research topics addressed by Kevin M. King include:

  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Family Support in Illness

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Jonas Dora
  • Max A. Halvorson
  • Liliana J. Lengua
  • Connor McCabe
  • Adam M. Kuczynski

Kevin M. King publishes regularly in specialized academic journals. Their top publication venues are:

  • Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
  • Clinical Psychological Science
  • Journal of Research in Personality
  • Journal of Personality
  • Assessment

Best Publications

  • Sexual orientation and adolescent substance use: a meta-analysis and methodological review.

    Michael P. Marshal;Mark S. Friedman;Ron Stall;Kevin M. King

  • Trajectories of alcohol and drug use and dependence from adolescence to adulthood: the effects of familial alcoholism and personality

    Laurie Chassin;David B. Flora;Kevin M. King

  • Why Are Self-Report and Behavioral Measures Weakly Correlated?

    Junhua Dang;Kevin M. King;Michael Inzlicht

  • A prospective study of the effects of age of initiation of alcohol and drug use on young adult substance dependence.

    Kevin M. King;Laurie Chassin

  • Developmental Trajectories of Anxiety and Depression in Early Adolescence

    Katie A. McLaughlin;Kevin King

  • Improving Present Practices in the Visual Display of Interactions.

    Connor J. McCabe;Dale S. Kim;Kevin M. King

  • Differential associations of threat and deprivation with emotion regulation and cognitive control in adolescence

    Hilary K. Lambert;Kevin M. King;Kathryn C. Monahan;Katie A. McLaughlin

  • Mediating and moderated effects of adolescent behavioral undercontrol and parenting in the prediction of drug use disorders in emerging adulthood.

    Kevin M. King;Laurie Chassin

  • Psychology's Replication Crisis and Clinical Psychological Science.

    Jennifer L. Tackett;Cassandra M. Brandes;Kevin M. King;Kristian E. Markon

  • Marker or mediator? The effects of adolescent substance use on young adult educational attainment

    Kevin M. King;Barbara T. Meehan;Ryan S. Trim;Laurie Chassin

  • Individual Differences in the Development of Self-Regulation During Pre-adolescence: Connections to Context and Adjustment

    Kevin M. King;Liliana J. Lengua;Kathryn C. Monahan

  • Longitudinal modeling in developmental neuroimaging research: Common challenges, and solutions from developmental psychology.

    Kevin M. King;Andrew K. Littlefield;Connor J. McCabe;Kathryn L. Mills

  • Adolescent stressors, psychopathology, and young adult substance dependence: a prospective study.

    Kevin M. King;Laurie Chassin

  • Gender-Specific Mediational Links Between Parenting Styles, Parental Monitoring, Impulsiveness, Drinking Control, and Alcohol-Related Problems*

    Julie A Patock-Peckham;Kevin M King;Kevin M King;Antonio A Morgan-Lopez;Antonio A Morgan-Lopez;Emilio C Ulloa;Emilio C Ulloa

  • Cultural influences on positive father involvement in two-parent mexican-origin families

    Rick A. Cruz;Kevin M. King;Keith F. Widaman;Janxin Leu

  • Callous-Unemotional Traits as Unique Prospective Risk Factors for Substance Use in Early Adolescent Boys and Girls

    Brian T. Wymbs;Carolyn A. McCarty;Carolyn A. McCarty;Kevin M. King;Elizabeth McCauley;Elizabeth McCauley

  • Effectiveness of Task-Shifted Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Children Who Experienced Parental Death and Posttraumatic Stress in Kenya and Tanzania: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Shannon Dorsey;Leah Lucid;Prerna Martin;Kevin M King

  • Developmental consistency in associations between depressive symptoms and alcohol use in early adolescence

    Carolyn A. McCarty;Brian T. Wymbs;Kevin M. King;W. Alex Mason

  • Evidence for a Multi-Dimensional Latent Structural Model of Externalizing Disorders

    Katie Witkiewitz;Kevin King;Robert J. McMahon;Johnny Wu

  • Adolescent substance use disorders.

    Laurie Chassin;Jennifer Ritter;Ryan S. Trim;Kevin M. King

  • Trajectories of child and caregiver psychological adjustment in families of children with cancer.

    Lynn Fainsilber Katz;Kaitlyn Fladeboe;Kevin King;Kyrill Gurtovenko

  • Co-occurrence of sexual risk behaviors and substance use across emerging adulthood: evidence for state- and trait-level associations.

    Kevin M. King;Hong V. Nguyen;Rick Kosterman;Jennifer A. Bailey

Frequent Co-Authors

Laurie Chassin
Laurie Chassin Arizona State University
Carolyn A. McCarty
Carolyn A. McCarty Seattle Children's Hospital
Liliana J. Lengua
Liliana J. Lengua University of Washington
Elizabeth McCauley
Elizabeth McCauley University of Washington
Ann Vander Stoep
Ann Vander Stoep University of Washington
Kathryn C. Monahan
Kathryn C. Monahan University of Pittsburgh
Robert J. McMahon
Robert J. McMahon Simon Fraser University
Katie A. McLaughlin
Katie A. McLaughlin University of Oregon
Ryan S. Trim
Ryan S. Trim University of California, San Diego
Jane M. Simoni
Jane M. Simoni University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A Psychology degree opens doors to a wide range of online programs and career pathways, particularly in social work. Each state has its own requirements for those wishing to pursue a career in this field, making it important to research your chosen location carefully.

For example, the requirements to be a social worker in North Carolina include earning a bachelor’s or master’s degree in social work from an accredited program, completing supervised experience, and passing state-mandated exams. Similarly, you should explore how to become a social worker in North Dakota, which also has specific educational and licensing criteria.

Those interested in Ohio can find detailed steps by reviewing the requirements to be a social worker in Ohio, which highlight the importance of completing fieldwork and passing background checks. Likewise, understanding the requirements to be a social worker in Oklahoma is crucial for anyone considering a professional path in that state.

When choosing an online degree or planning a career in psychology or social work, always check state-specific guidelines for education, internships, exams, and licensing. This ensures you are prepared to meet all requirements and take advantage of growing opportunities in the field.

Best Scientists Citing Kevin M. King

Trending Scientists