World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 55 4343 4014 2419 2186 155 15008

Liliana J. Lengua publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Liliana J. Lengua between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Liliana J. Lengua published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2021. 19 of the 168 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2021. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 7 publications
1992 2025

168 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Liliana J. Lengua: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 0
1994 0
1995 1
1996 1
1997 1
1998 1
1999 2
2000 5
2001 2
2002 4
2003 1
2004 2
2005 3
2006 4
2007 1
2008 3
2009 4
2010 3
2011 5
2012 7
2013 10
2014 6
2015 2
2016 7
2017 6
2018 13
2019 3
2020 5
2021 17
2022 17
2023 12
2024 12
2025 7
Total 168
Download as CSV

Liliana J. Lengua publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Liliana J. Lengua sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 155 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 155
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Liliana J. Lengua D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Liliana J. Lengua sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 55
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Liliana J. Lengua is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their primary field of study is Psychology, with a significant focus on Clinical Psychology. Additional areas of research include Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health.

Their research explores various topics, notably:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Lengua has contributed to multiple papers, including:

  • "Promoting youth mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal study" (2021), published in PLoS ONE
  • "Corporal Punishment and Elevated Neural Response to Threat in Children" (2021), published in Child Development
  • "Language development as a mechanism linking socioeconomic status to executive functioning development in preschool" (2022), published in Developmental Science
  • "Impulsive States and Impulsive Traits: A Study of the Multilevel Structure and Validity of a Multifaceted Measure of Impulsive States" (2020), published in Assessment
  • "An empirical test of the model of socialization of emotion: Maternal and child contributors to preschoolers' emotion knowledge and adjustment." (2020), published in Developmental Psychology

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Stephanie F. Thompson
  • Lisa Shimomaeda
  • Katie A. McLaughlin
  • Kevin M. King
  • Maureen Zalewski

Liliana J. Lengua's work is often published in venues such as:

  • Development and Psychopathology
  • Mindfulness
  • Assessment
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Anxiety Stress & Coping

The researcher has also contributed to book publications:

  • Temperament and Child Development in Context (2024), published by Cambridge University Press
  • Parenting With Temperament in Mind (2024), published by the American Psychological Association

Best Publications

  • Parenting Practices and Child Disruptive Behavior Problems in Early Elementary School

    Elizabeth A. Stormshak;Karen L. Bierman;Robert J. McMahon;Liliana J. Lengua

  • Parent Involvement in School Conceptualizing Multiple Dimensions and Their Relations with Family and Demographic Risk Factors

    Gwynne O. Kohl;Liliana J. Lengua;Robert J. McMahon

  • Nature and nurturing: parenting in the context of child temperament.

    Cara J. Kiff;Liliana J. Lengua;Maureen Zalewski

  • Contextual risk and parenting as predictors of effortful control and social competence in preschool children

    Liliana J. Lengua;Elizabeth Honorado;Nicole R. Bush

  • Bidirectional Associations between Temperament and Parenting and the Prediction of Adjustment Problems in Middle Childhood.

    Liliana J. Lengua;Erica A. Kovacs

  • Growth in temperament and parenting as predictors of adjustment during children's transition to adolescence.

    Liliana J. Lengua

  • The Contribution of Emotionality and Self-Regulation to the Understanding of Children's Response to Multiple Risk.

    Liliana J. Lengua

  • Predicting Developmental Outcomes at School Entry Using a Multiple-Risk Model: Four American Communities

    Mark T. Greenberg;Liliana J. Lengua;John D. Coie;Ellen E. Pinderhughes

  • Temperament as a predictor of symptomatology in children: addressing contamination of measures.

    Liliana J. Lengua;Stephen G. West;Irwin N. Sandler

  • The additive and interactive effects of parenting and temperament in predicting adjustment problems of children of divorce.

    Liliana J. Lengua;Sharlene A. Wolchik;Irwin N. Sandler;Stephen G. West

  • An experimental evaluation of theory-based mother and mother-child programs for children of divorce

    Sharlene A. Wolchik;Stephen G. West;Irwin N. Sandler;Jenn Yun Tein

  • Associations among emotionality, self-regulation, adjustment problems, and positive adjustment in middle childhood

    Liliana J Lengua

  • Gender, gender roles, and personality: Gender differences in the prediction of coping and psychological symptoms

    Liliana J. Lengua;Elizabeth A. Stormshak

  • The role of emotionality and self-regulation in the appraisal–coping process: tests of direct and moderating effects

    Liliana J Lengua;Anna C Long

  • Emotionality and self-regulation, threat appraisal, and coping in children of divorce

    Liliana J. Lengua;Irwin N. Sandler;Stephen G. West;Sharlene A. Wolchik

  • Effectiveness of Educational Materials Designed to Change Knowledge and Behaviors Regarding Crying and Shaken-Baby Syndrome in Mothers of Newborns: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

    Ronald G. Barr;Frederick P. Rivara;Marilyn Barr;Peter Cummings

  • Effortful control as a moderator of the relation between contextual risk factors and growth in adjustment problems.

    Liliana J. Lengua;Nicole R. Bush;Anna C. Long;Erica A. Kovacs

  • Prospective Associations of Internalizing and Externalizing Problems and Their Co-Occurrence with Early Adolescent Substance Use

    Craig R. Colder;Matthew Scalco;Elisa M. Trucco;Jennifer P. Read

  • Rationally and empirically derived dimensions of children's symptomatology: expert ratings and confirmatory factor analyses of the CBCL.

    Liliana J. Lengua;Christine A. Sadowski;William N. Friedrich;Jennifer Fisher

  • Adolescent school failure predicts later depression among girls.

    Carolyn A. McCarty;W. Alex Mason;Rick Kosterman;J. David Hawkins

Frequent Co-Authors

Craig R. Colder
Craig R. Colder University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Larry W. Hawk
Larry W. Hawk University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Jennifer P. Read
Jennifer P. Read University at Buffalo, State University of New York
William F. Wieczorek
William F. Wieczorek Buffalo State College
Kevin M. King
Kevin M. King University of Washington
Andrew N. Meltzoff
Andrew N. Meltzoff University of Washington
J. David Hawkins
J. David Hawkins University of Washington
W. Alex Mason
W. Alex Mason University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Rina D. Eiden
Rina D. Eiden Pennsylvania State University
Bruce E. Compas
Bruce E. Compas Vanderbilt University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online psychology degree in the USA opens many doorways beyond traditional roles. Students can explore related fields like counseling, therapy, or behavioral health—areas that are in demand across the country. Choosing the right program is essential, as regional offerings vary in focus and quality.

For instance, those interested in the West Coast can look into San Diego counseling degree programs or explore the rigorous and diverse options provided by best counseling degree programs in Seattle. Students in the southern US have access to a range of accredited choices through South counseling degree programs. Alternatively, students seeking value and supportive learning environments may benefit from the best college counseling programs in Stockton.

Online learning can accelerate entry into fields like marriage and family therapy, school counseling, or clinical psychology. Graduates enjoy flexible career paths that include community work, private practice, and research. Carefully comparing programs ensures students find the best fit for their goals and preferred locations.

Best Scientists Citing Liliana J. Lengua

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles