World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 54 4517 4180 2509 2270 173 16084

Jennifer P. Read publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jennifer P. Read between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jennifer P. Read published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 7.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2013. 19 of the 205 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2013. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 6 publications
1999 2025

205 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jennifer P. Read: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 0
2001 6
2002 3
2003 6
2004 7
2005 6
2006 3
2007 2
2008 5
2009 6
2010 6
2011 4
2012 10
2013 17
2014 12
2015 4
2016 10
2017 15
2018 12
2019 11
2020 8
2021 11
2022 10
2023 11
2024 13
2025 6
Total 205
Download as CSV

Jennifer P. Read publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennifer P. Read sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 173 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 173
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jennifer P. Read D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennifer P. Read sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 54
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jennifer P. Read is affiliated with the University at Buffalo, State University of New York in the United States. Their research primarily spans psychology and medicine, comprising 66 and 35 publications respectively, with a focused contribution to areas including clinical psychology, epidemiology, general health professions, applied psychology, and health.

Their scholarly work addresses a range of topics within behavioral health and psychosocial domains. Key topics in their research include substance abuse treatment and outcomes, sexual assault and victimization studies, behavioral health and interventions, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, intimate partner and family violence, homelessness and social issues, and sex work and related issues.

Jennifer P. Read has authored numerous articles, with recent notable papers including:

  • "The daily association between affect and alcohol use: A meta-analysis of individual participant data." (2023, Psychological Bulletin)
  • "Alcohol and cannabis co-use and social context as risk pathways to sexual assault." (2021, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors)
  • "Adverse childhood experiences and adulthood mental health: a cross-cultural examination among university students in seven countries." (2022, Current Psychology)
  • "Individualism, collectivism, and emotion regulation: a cross-cultural examination among young adults from seven countries." (2024, Current Psychology)
  • "Resilience to mental health problems and the role of deployment status among U.S. Army Reserve and National Guard Soldiers." (2020, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology)

The scientist frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Craig R. Colder
  • Adrián J. Bravo
  • Michelle J. Zaso
  • Matthew T. Keough
  • Angelina Pilatti

Their research outputs are often published in specialized venues, such as:

  • Traumatology An International Journal
  • Current Psychology
  • Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
  • Substance Use & Misuse
  • Violence Against Women

Best Publications

  • Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART).

    C. W. Lejuez;Jennifer P. Read;Christopher W. Kahler;Jerry B. Richards

  • Toward Efficient and Comprehensive Measurement of the Alcohol Problems Continuum in College Students: The Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire

    Christopher W. Kahler;David R. Strong;Jennifer P. Read

  • Do parents still matter? Parent and peer influences on alcohol involvement among recent high school graduates.

    Mark D. Wood;Jennifer P. Read;Roger E. Mitchell;Nancy H. Brand

  • Development and Preliminary Validation of the Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire.

    Jennifer P Read;Christopher W Kahler;David R Strong;Craig R Colder

  • The Impact of Event Scale –Revised: Psychometric properties in a sample of motor vehicle accident survivors

    J. Gayle Beck;DeMond M. Grant;Jennifer P. Read;Joshua D. Clapp

  • The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) differentiates smokers and nonsmokers.

    C. W. Lejuez;Will M Aklin;Heather A Jones;Jerry B Richards

  • Examining the role of drinking motives in college student alcohol use and problems.

    Jennifer P. Read;Mark D. Wood;Christopher W. Kahler;Jay E. Maddock

  • Rates of DSM-IV-TR Trauma Exposure and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among Newly Matriculated College Students.

    Jennifer P. Read;Paige Ouimette;Jacquelyn White;Craig Colder

  • Social influence processes and college student drinking: the mediational role of alcohol outcome expectancies

    Mark D. Wood;Jennifer P. Read;Tibor P. Palfai;John F. Stevenson

  • Substance use and posttraumatic stress disorders: Symptom interplay and effects on outcome

    Jennifer P. Read;Pamela J. Brown;Christopher W. Kahler

  • Dimensions and severity of marijuana consequences: development and validation of the Marijuana Consequences Questionnaire (MACQ).

    Jeffrey S. Simons;Robert D. Dvorak;Jennifer E. Merrill;Jennifer P. Read

  • Drinking Motives in the Prospective Prediction of Unique Alcohol-Related Consequences in College Students

    Jennifer E. Merrill;Jeffrey D. Wardell;Jennifer P. Read

  • Motivational pathways to unique types of alcohol consequences.

    Jennifer E. Merrill;Jennifer P. Read

  • Making the Transition from High School to College: The Role of Alcohol-Related Social Influence Factors in Students' Drinking

    Jennifer P. Read;Mark D. Wood;Orion J. Davidoff;Julie McLacken

  • Prospective Associations of Internalizing and Externalizing Problems and Their Co-Occurrence with Early Adolescent Substance Use

    Craig R. Colder;Matthew Scalco;Elisa M. Trucco;Jennifer P. Read

  • Trauma and Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms Predict Alcohol and Other Drug Consequence Trajectories in the First Year of College

    Jennifer P. Read;Craig R. Colder;Jennifer E. Merrill;Paige Ouimette

  • Predicting functional outcomes among college drinkers: Reliability and predictive validity of the Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire

    Jennifer P. Read;Jennifer E. Merrill;Christopher W. Kahler;David R. Strong

  • A pilot study of aerobic exercise as an adjunctive treatment for drug dependence

    Richard A Brown;Ana M Abrantes;Jennifer P Read;Bess H Marcus

  • Beyond the “Binge” threshold: Heavy drinking patterns and their association with alcohol involvement indices in college students

    Jennifer P. Read;Melissa Beattie;Rebecca Chamberlain;Jennifer E. Merrill

  • Aerobic Exercise for Alcohol Recovery: Rationale, Program Description, and Preliminary Findings.

    Richard A. Brown;Ana M. Abrantes;Jennifer P. Read;Bess H. Marcus

  • BRIEF REPORTS Motivational Pathways to Unique Types of Alcohol Consequences

    Jennifer E. Merrill;Jennifer P. Read

Frequent Co-Authors

Craig R. Colder
Craig R. Colder University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Christopher W. Kahler
Christopher W. Kahler Brown University
Richard A. Brown
Richard A. Brown The University of Texas at Austin
Susan E. Ramsey
Susan E. Ramsey Brown University
David R. Strong
David R. Strong University of California, San Diego
William F. Wieczorek
William F. Wieczorek Buffalo State College
Larry W. Hawk
Larry W. Hawk University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Liliana J. Lengua
Liliana J. Lengua University of Washington
Paige Ouimette
Paige Ouimette Syracuse University
Mark D. Wood
Mark D. Wood University of Rhode Island

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens up many related fields and career opportunities. Counseling, in particular, is a popular pathway, with increasing demand for qualified professionals across the country. Finding an affordable degree can make all the difference in making your education accessible and manageable financially.

Students looking for value and flexibility may consider online or hybrid programs. There are various affordable options highlighted in several U.S. regions. For instance, those in the Midwest can consider the cheapest counseling programs in Ohio. In the Northeast, options include affordable counseling degrees in Pennsylvania.

City-based learners aren’t left out either. Individuals located in Pennsylvania’s largest cities may want to explore the cheapest counseling programs in Philadelphia or the cheapest counseling programs in Pittsburgh. Each of these options provides pathways to careers such as licensed counselor, mental health specialist, or human services professional—all crucial roles for communities.

Best Scientists Citing Jennifer P. Read

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles