World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
7598
World Ranking
8779
National Ranking
4673

Mark D. Wood publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark D. Wood sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 72 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark D. Wood D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark D. Wood sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark D. Wood was affiliated with the University of Rhode Island in the United States. Their research contributions focused primarily on the intersection of religion, society, and development, as well as Christian theology and biblical studies.

Wood's scholarly work spanned the fields of Arts and Humanities and Social Sciences, with particular emphasis on Religious Studies and Sociology and Political Science as subfields. Their publications reflected an interdisciplinary approach bridging these areas.

In terms of main topics, Wood concentrated on:

  • Religion, Society, and Development
  • Christian Theology and Mission
  • Biblical Studies and Interpretation

Their publication record included a paper titled Book review: Jayson Georges, Ministering in Patronage Cultures: Biblical Models and Missional Implications, published in 2020 in the journal Missiology An International Review. This was the sole publication listed, appearing in a frequently used venue for their work.

Wood did not have recorded frequent co-authors or book publications, indicating possibly more independent research or contributions focused on articles rather than monographs.

Overall, Wood's academic output contributed to advancing knowledge in religious studies within the broader arts, humanities, and social sciences contexts, particularly addressing themes of theology, biblical interpretation, and their impacts on societal development.

Best Publications

  • Do parents still matter? Parent and peer influences on alcohol involvement among recent high school graduates.

    Mark D. Wood;Jennifer P. Read;Roger E. Mitchell;Nancy H. Brand

  • Personality and substance use disorders: A prospective study.

    Kenneth J. Sher;Bruce D. Bartholow;Mark D. Wood

  • Examining the role of drinking motives in college student alcohol use and problems.

    Jennifer P. Read;Mark D. Wood;Christopher W. Kahler;Jay E. Maddock

  • Social influence processes and college student drinking: the mediational role of alcohol outcome expectancies

    Mark D. Wood;Jennifer P. Read;Tibor P. Palfai;John F. Stevenson

  • Alcohol Outcome Expectancies and Alcohol Use: A Latent Variable Cross-Lagged Panel Study

    Kenneth J. Sher;Mark D. Wood;Phillip K. Wood;Gail Raskin

  • Anxiety and Drinking Behavior: Moderating Effects of Tension‐Reduction Alcohol Outcome Expectancies

    Matt G. Kushner;Kenneth J. Sher;Mark D. Wood;Phillip K. Wood

  • Alcohol norms and expectations as predictors of alcohol use and problems in a college student sample.

    Mark D. Wood;Craig T. Nagoshi;David A. Dennis

  • Making the Transition from High School to College: The Role of Alcohol-Related Social Influence Factors in Students' Drinking

    Jennifer P. Read;Mark D. Wood;Orion J. Davidoff;Julie McLacken

  • Measuring mindfulness and examining its relationship with alcohol use and negative consequences.

    Anne C. Fernandez;Mark D. Wood;L. A. R. Stein;Joseph S. Rossi

  • Fraternity and Sorority Involvement, Social Influences, and Alcohol Use Among College Students: A Prospective Examination

    Christy Capone;Mark D. Wood;Brian Borsari;Robert D. Laird

  • Psychosocial correlates of voluntary HIV antibody testing in college students.

    N Dorr;S Krueckeberg;A Strathman;M D Wood

  • Description and predictors of positive and negative alcohol-related consequences in the first year of college.

    Nancy P. Barnett;Elise M. Clerkin;Mark Wood;Peter M. Monti

  • Personality factors moderate subjective and psychophysiological responses to d-amphetamine in humans.

    Kent E. Hutchison;Mark D. Wood;Robert Swift

  • Brief motivational intervention and alcohol expectancy challenge with heavy drinking college students: A randomized factorial study

    Mark D. Wood;Christy Capone;Robert Laforge;Darin J. Erickson

  • Stress-response-dampening effects of alcohol: attention as a mediator and moderator.

    Kenneth J. Sher;Bruce D. Bartholow;Karl Peuser;Darin J. Erickson

  • Social environmental selection as a mediator of gender, ethnic, and personality effects on college student drinking.

    Christopher W. Kahler;Jennifer P. Read;Mark D. Wood;Tibor P. Palfai

  • Gender, alcohol consumption, and differing alcohol expectancy dimensions in college drinkers.

    Jennifer P. Read;Mark D. Wood;C. W. Lejuez;Tibor P. Palfai

  • A prospective investigation of relations between social influences and alcohol involvement during the transition into college.

    Jennifer P Read;Mark D Wood;Christy Capone

  • A Randomized Trial of a Parent-Based Intervention on Drinking Behavior Among Incoming College Freshmen

    Michael A. Ichiyama;Anne M. Fairlie;Mark D. Wood;Rob Turrisi

  • Brief motivational and parent interventions for college students: a randomized factorial study.

    Mark D. Wood;Anne M. Fairlie;Anne C. Fernandez;Brian Borsari

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth J. Sher
Kenneth J. Sher University of Missouri
Jennifer P. Read
Jennifer P. Read University at Buffalo, State University of New York
William DeJong
William DeJong Boston University
Tibor P. Palfai
Tibor P. Palfai Boston University
Brian Borsari
Brian Borsari University of California, San Francisco
Christopher W. Kahler
Christopher W. Kahler Brown University
Craig T. Nagoshi
Craig T. Nagoshi The University of Texas at Arlington
Nancy P. Barnett
Nancy P. Barnett Brown University
Kristina M. Jackson
Kristina M. Jackson Brown University
Phillip K. Wood
Phillip K. Wood University of Missouri

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens doors to a wide range of career pathways, including counseling, therapy, research, and mental health advocacy. Many students opt to specialize in counseling, which prepares them for diverse roles in schools, clinics, or private practice.

Choosing a program that matches your career goals is essential. Depending on your location and interests, you might consider the best college counseling programs in Cleveland, or look to the south with leading Georgia counseling degree programs.

If you’re drawn to the Midwest, consider the top counseling degree programs in Iowa or the acclaimed top counseling degree programs in Illinois. Each state offers unique program strengths, specialties, and licensure opportunities.

Earning an accredited online degree can provide both flexibility and accessibility. Whether you want to become a clinical counselor, school psychologist, or pursue advanced research roles, exploring these programs will help shape your ideal career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Mark D. Wood

Recently Published Articles